Technology area: Transportation, E-Commerce & Mechanical Systems
1 pending office actions • 1 art units • 1 examiners • 0 of 1 (0%) have an AI response strategy ready
Bright Yeti Inc. is managing 1 pending office action in the Transportation, E-Commerce & Mechanical Systems technology area. This matter is assigned to 1 distinct examiner, CONLON, MARISA V, who is the busiest examiner for the portfolio with 1 pending action. Prosecution is limited to 1 distinct art unit, reflecting a focused technical review for the company's mechanical systems or e-commerce claims.
Because there is 1 pending office action, the prosecution strategy is dependent on the interaction with CONLON, MARISA V. The 1 distinct art unit involved will provide the technical framework for the examination of the 1 pending action. Practitioners should prepare for a centralized prosecution process where the examiner's interpretation of the Transportation, E-Commerce & Mechanical Systems field is the primary factor for success. This concentrated activity in 1 art unit simplifies the monitoring of examiner behavior but focuses current risk on the outcome of a single filing. The presence of 1 examiner for 1 pending action ensures that the legal strategy is tailored to a specific set of expectations.
Based on the USPTO statutory response window for each pending office action. 1 of the docket's apps have a known mailing date; the rest are excluded from the tile counts.
Difficulty is derived from the rejection statutes on the most recent pending office action. §101-driven and multi-statute cases are graded Hard; §112-only and obviousness-type double-patenting cases are graded Easy; everything else is Medium. "Unknown" means we have not yet parsed a statute for that office action.
| Bucket | Cases |
|---|---|
| Multi-statute (no §101) | 1 (100%) |
How the docket's pending cases split across USPTO tech-center bands.
Manual office-action response work runs about 10 hours per case. The time-saved bands below show what IP Author's prosecution pipeline typically delivers — a conservative 20% on the low end, 35% in the middle, 50% on the high end.
| Examiner | Apps on this docket | Allow rate | Interview lift |
|---|---|---|---|
| CONLON, MARISA V | 1 | 41.2% | +36.5% |
Multi-statute / §101-driven matters, or cases in front of an examiner with an allow rate under 30%. The top 1 ordered by deadline are shown.
| App # | Title | Examiner | Due in |
|---|---|---|---|
| 18253230 | SYSTEMS AND METHODS FOR ELECTROMAGNETIC TREATMENT OF PLANTS | CONLON, MARISA V | 22d |
Cases in front of an examiner whose interview lift is 10 percentage points or more — i.e. interviewed cases historically resolve more favorably than non-interviewed ones. The top 1 ordered by deadline are shown.
| App # | Title | Examiner | Due in |
|---|---|---|---|
| 18253230 | SYSTEMS AND METHODS FOR ELECTROMAGNETIC TREATMENT OF PLANTS | CONLON, MARISA V | 22d |
| Art Unit | Apps |
|---|---|
| 3643 | 1 |
| App # | Title | Examiner | Art Unit | Statutes | Status | Due in | AI | Filed |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 18253230 | SYSTEMS AND METHODS FOR ELECTROMAGNETIC TREATMENT OF PLANTS | CONLON, MARISA V | 3643 | §102§103§112Other | Final Rejection | 22d | Pending | May 17, 2023 |
IP Author helps IP teams respond to office actions faster with AI-generated responses, examiner analytics, and prosecution intelligence.
Start Free TrialBright Yeti Inc. has 1 pending office actions as of October 2026, spread across 1 art units and 1 examiners.
Marisa V Conlon has the most, with 1 of Bright Yeti Inc.'s pending office actions.
Mostly Transportation, E-Commerce & Mechanical Systems (USPTO Tech Center 3600), based on where its pending office actions are examined.
