Prosecution Insights
Last updated: August 18, 2026

Brightai Corporation

9 pending office actions • 6 art units • 9 examiners • 0 of 9 (0%) have an AI response strategy ready • 1 patents granted in the last 365 days

Portfolio Summary

9
Total Pending OAs
4
Non-Final OAs
4
Final Rejections
1
Advisory / Quayle

Response Deadline Pressure

Based on the USPTO statutory response window for each pending office action. 3 of the docket's apps have a known mailing date; the rest are excluded from the tile counts.

1
Overdue
0
Due this week
1
Due this month
1
Due in next 60 days
0
Due later

Deadline Fire Line

Every pending office action with a known statutory deadline, placed on a days-until-due axis. Dots left of Today are overdue; the further right, the more runway. Cases that share a deadline window stack vertically. 3 of the docket's apps have a known mailing date.

-30dToday30d60d90d120d
Overdue (1)Due ≤ 30 days (1)Due ≤ 60 days (1)

Case Difficulty Mix

Difficulty is derived from the rejection statutes on the most recent pending office action. §101-driven and multi-statute cases are graded Hard; §112-only and obviousness-type double-patenting cases are graded Easy; everything else is Medium. "Unknown" means we have not yet parsed a statute for that office action.

3
Hard (33%)
6
Medium (67%)
0
Easy (0%)
0
Unknown (0%)

Rejection Statute Mix

BucketCases
§101 + other3 (33%)
§103 only6 (67%)

Industry Mix

How the docket's pending cases split across USPTO tech-center bands.

0
Life Sciences
0% of docket
0
Information Tech
0% of docket
2
Communications
22% of docket
1
Semiconductors
11% of docket
4
Mechanical / Eng
44% of docket
2
Business / Other
22% of docket

Time-on-OA Estimate

Manual office-action response work runs about 10 hours per case. The time-saved bands below show what IP Author's prosecution pipeline typically delivers — a conservative 20% on the low end, 35% in the middle, 50% on the high end.

90 h
Manual time on pending OAs
18 h
Time saved (low, 20%)
31 h
Time saved (mid, 35%)
0.8 wks
FTE-weeks freed (mid)

Top Examiners on this docket

ExaminerApps on this docketAllow rateInterview lift
LEMIEUX, IAN L 1 86.9% +8.9%
BONANSINGA, AARON TIMOTHY 1 77.1% +34.8%
HARVEY II, KEVIN JEROME 1 56.3% +1.6%
TESSEMA, BESUFEKAD LEMMA 1 55.6% -8.3%
MARTINEZ BORRERO, LUIS A 1 80.9% +17.7%
BACA, MATTHEW WALTER 1 73.6% +4.5%
HEIM, MARK ROBERT 1 54.2% -1.3%
HAUSMANN, MICHELLE M 1 76.5% +21.3%
BEKELE, MEKONEN T 1 79.0% +13.6%

Quick Wins (1)

Cases in front of an examiner with an allow rate of 80%+ where the difficulty is Easy or Medium. The top 1 ordered by deadline are shown.

App #TitleExaminerDue in
18885405 SYSTEMS AND METHODS FOR AUTONOMOUS DRIVING IF A ROBOT USING DIGITAL MAP MARTINEZ BORRERO, LUIS A

Hard Cases (3)

Multi-statute / §101-driven matters, or cases in front of an examiner with an allow rate under 30%. The top 3 ordered by deadline are shown.

App #TitleExaminerDue in
18492672 SYSTEMS AND ASSOCIATED METHODS FOR GENERATING A DIGITAL REPRESENTATION OF AN ENVIRONMENT BACA, MATTHEW WALTER 3d overdue
18492676 SYSTEMS AND ASSOCIATED METHODS FOR MULTIMODAL FEATURE DETECTION OF AN ENVIRONMENT HEIM, MARK ROBERT 22d
18917476 ADAPTIVE RECOGNITION USE HISTORY LEMIEUX, IAN L

Interview Candidates (4)

Cases in front of an examiner whose interview lift is 10 percentage points or more — i.e. interviewed cases historically resolve more favorably than non-interviewed ones. The top 4 ordered by deadline are shown.

App #TitleExaminerDue in
18917506 RELEVANCE BASED WEIGHTING BONANSINGA, AARON TIMOTHY
18885405 SYSTEMS AND METHODS FOR AUTONOMOUS DRIVING IF A ROBOT USING DIGITAL MAP MARTINEZ BORRERO, LUIS A
18492662 SYSTEMS AND ASSOCIATED METHODS FOR REAL-TIME FEATURE DETECTION OF AN ENVIRONMENT HAUSMANN, MICHELLE M
18492693 SYSTEMS AND ASSOCIATED METHODS FOR COMBINING INFRARED AND VISUAL DATA OF AN ENVIRONMENT BEKELE, MEKONEN T

Top Art Units

Art UnitApps
3665 2
3664 1
2857 1
3668 1
2671 1
2699 1

Pending Office Actions

App #TitleExaminerArt UnitStatutesStatusDue inAIFiled
18917476 ADAPTIVE RECOGNITION USE HISTORY LEMIEUX, IAN L §101§103 Non-Final OA Pending Oct 16, 2024
18917506 RELEVANCE BASED WEIGHTING BONANSINGA, AARON TIMOTHY §103 Non-Final OA Pending Oct 16, 2024
18885389 AUTONOMOUSLY DRIVING ROBOT HAVING A SENSOR PACKAGE HARVEY II, KEVIN JEROME 3664 §103 Non-Final OA 53d Pending Sep 13, 2024
18885430 SYSTEM AND METHOD FOR AUTOMATIC ADJUSTMENT OF ROBOT REFERENCE FRAME TESSEMA, BESUFEKAD LEMMA 3665 §103 Final Rejection Pending Sep 13, 2024
18885405 SYSTEMS AND METHODS FOR AUTONOMOUS DRIVING IF A ROBOT USING DIGITAL MAP MARTINEZ BORRERO, LUIS A 3665 §103 Non-Final OA Pending Sep 13, 2024
18492672 SYSTEMS AND ASSOCIATED METHODS FOR GENERATING A DIGITAL REPRESENTATION OF AN ENVIRONMENT BACA, MATTHEW WALTER 2857 §101§103 Final Rejection 3d overdue Pending Oct 23, 2023
18492676 SYSTEMS AND ASSOCIATED METHODS FOR MULTIMODAL FEATURE DETECTION OF AN ENVIRONMENT HEIM, MARK ROBERT 3668 §101§103 Non-Final OA 22d Pending Oct 23, 2023
18492662 SYSTEMS AND ASSOCIATED METHODS FOR REAL-TIME FEATURE DETECTION OF AN ENVIRONMENT HAUSMANN, MICHELLE M 2671 §103 Final Rejection Pending Oct 23, 2023
18492693 SYSTEMS AND ASSOCIATED METHODS FOR COMBINING INFRARED AND VISUAL DATA OF AN ENVIRONMENT BEKELE, MEKONEN T 2699 §103 Final Rejection Pending Oct 23, 2023

Managing Brightai Corporation's Patent Portfolio?

IP Author helps IP teams respond to office actions faster with AI-generated responses, examiner analytics, and prosecution intelligence.

Start Free Trial

Sign in with your work email

Enter your email to receive a magic link. No password needed.

Personal email addresses (Gmail, Yahoo, etc.) are not accepted.

Free tier: 3 strategy analyses per month