Prosecution Insights
Prosecution Insights
Technology area: Computing & Software
1 pending office actions • 1 art units • 1 examiners • 0 of 1 (0%) have an AI response strategy ready
Brightedge Technologies Inc. currently faces 1 pending office action within the Computing & Software technology area. This single action is under the review of 1 distinct examiner, MOSER, BRUCE M. The prosecution is localized within 1 distinct art unit, indicating a concentrated technical focus for the company's current patent office activity. This singular engagement means that the company's entire pending portfolio is subject to the scrutiny of one individual in a specific administrative unit.
MOSER, BRUCE M is the busiest examiner for this portfolio, handling 1 pending office action. Since there is only 1 distinct examiner and 1 pending action, the prosecution strategy is entirely focused on this individual's assessment and feedback. The alignment of 1 art unit and 1 examiner suggests a straightforward administrative path for the pending matter, as there are no conflicting examiner styles or art unit policies to navigate. Practitioners can focus their resources on addressing the specific concerns raised by this single examiner to move the application toward allowance.
Based on the USPTO statutory response window for each pending office action. 1 of the docket's apps have a known mailing date; the rest are excluded from the tile counts.
Difficulty is derived from the rejection statutes on the most recent pending office action. §101-driven and multi-statute cases are graded Hard; §112-only and obviousness-type double-patenting cases are graded Easy; everything else is Medium. "Unknown" means we have not yet parsed a statute for that office action.
| Bucket | Cases |
|---|---|
| §101 + other | 1 (100%) |
How the docket's pending cases split across USPTO tech-center bands.
Manual office-action response work runs about 10 hours per case. The time-saved bands below show what IP Author's prosecution pipeline typically delivers — a conservative 20% on the low end, 35% in the middle, 50% on the high end.
| Examiner | Apps on this docket | Allow rate | Interview lift |
|---|---|---|---|
| MOSER, BRUCE M | 1 | 84.2% | +20.1% |
Multi-statute / §101-driven matters, or cases in front of an examiner with an allow rate under 30%. The top 1 ordered by deadline are shown.
| App # | Title | Examiner | Due in |
|---|---|---|---|
| 19056695 | PARSING SEARCH RESULTS | MOSER, BRUCE M | 60d overdue |
Cases in front of an examiner whose interview lift is 10 percentage points or more — i.e. interviewed cases historically resolve more favorably than non-interviewed ones. The top 1 ordered by deadline are shown.
| App # | Title | Examiner | Due in |
|---|---|---|---|
| 19056695 | PARSING SEARCH RESULTS | MOSER, BRUCE M | 60d overdue |
| Art Unit | Apps |
|---|---|
| 2154 | 1 |
| App # | Title | Examiner | Art Unit | Statutes | Status | Due in | AI | Filed |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 19056695 | PARSING SEARCH RESULTS | MOSER, BRUCE M | 2154 | §101§102 | Non-Final OA | 60d overdue | Pending | Feb 18, 2025 |
IP Author helps IP teams respond to office actions faster with AI-generated responses, examiner analytics, and prosecution intelligence.
Start Free Trial