Prosecution Insights
Prosecution Insights
Technology area: Semiconductors, Circuits & Optics
1 pending office actions • 1 art units • 1 examiners • 0 of 1 (0%) have an AI response strategy ready • 1 patents granted in the last 365 days
Brightview Technologies Inc. currently manages 1 pending office action within the Semiconductors, Circuits & Optics technology area. This matter is assigned to 1 distinct examiner, which indicates a highly concentrated prosecution effort for the company's current intellectual property. The portfolio's immediate future at the patent office is tied to the outcome of this specific case.
The pending matter is situated within 1 distinct art unit. This concentration suggests that the technical subject matter of the company's current filing is focused within a single specialized group at the patent office. For a patent practitioner, the technical standards and examination culture of this specific art unit will be the primary environment for the company's current prosecution.
GYLLSTROM, BRYON T is identified as the busiest examiner for the portfolio, currently overseeing the pending action. As the only individual involved in the portfolio's current pending matters, the individual examination style and precedents of GYLLSTROM, BRYON T are the most critical factors for the company's legal representatives to consider. The success of the prosecution depends entirely on the interactions with this 1 distinct examiner.
Based on the USPTO statutory response window for each pending office action. 1 of the docket's apps have a known mailing date; the rest are excluded from the tile counts.
Difficulty is derived from the rejection statutes on the most recent pending office action. §101-driven and multi-statute cases are graded Hard; §112-only and obviousness-type double-patenting cases are graded Easy; everything else is Medium. "Unknown" means we have not yet parsed a statute for that office action.
| Bucket | Cases |
|---|---|
| Multi-statute (no §101) | 1 (100%) |
How the docket's pending cases split across USPTO tech-center bands.
Manual office-action response work runs about 10 hours per case. The time-saved bands below show what IP Author's prosecution pipeline typically delivers — a conservative 20% on the low end, 35% in the middle, 50% on the high end.
| Examiner | Apps on this docket | Allow rate | Interview lift |
|---|---|---|---|
| GYLLSTROM, BRYON T | 1 | 67.8% | +7.5% |
Multi-statute / §101-driven matters, or cases in front of an examiner with an allow rate under 30%. The top 1 ordered by deadline are shown.
| App # | Title | Examiner | Due in |
|---|---|---|---|
| 19224646 | Deglaring Films for Illumination Systems | GYLLSTROM, BRYON T | 69d |
| Art Unit | Apps |
|---|---|
| 2875 | 1 |
| App # | Title | Examiner | Art Unit | Statutes | Status | Due in | AI | Filed |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 19224646 | Deglaring Films for Illumination Systems | GYLLSTROM, BRYON T | 2875 | §102§103 | Non-Final OA | 69d | Pending | May 30, 2025 |
IP Author helps IP teams respond to office actions faster with AI-generated responses, examiner analytics, and prosecution intelligence.
Start Free Trial