Technology area: Medical Devices & Mechanical Engineering
1 pending office actions • 1 art units • 1 examiners • 0 of 1 (0%) have an AI response strategy ready
Brite Wind Consulting Limited currently has 1 pending office action in the Medical Devices & Mechanical Engineering technology area. This action is located within a single distinct art unit. The prosecution involves 1 distinct examiner. This data shows a highly specific point of contact within the patent office for the company's current filing.
MATTHEW R MARCHEWKA is the busiest examiner for the company, holding the only pending matter. The alignment of an examiner and an art unit for this single matter indicates that the company's current patent strategy is focused on a single technical area. For a practitioner, this means that the outcome of the filing depends entirely on the review of MATTHEW R MARCHEWKA within that specific art unit.
Based on the USPTO statutory response window for each pending office action. 1 of the docket's apps have a known mailing date; the rest are excluded from the tile counts.
Difficulty is derived from the rejection statutes on the most recent pending office action. §101-driven and multi-statute cases are graded Hard; §112-only and obviousness-type double-patenting cases are graded Easy; everything else is Medium. "Unknown" means we have not yet parsed a statute for that office action.
| Bucket | Cases |
|---|---|
| Multi-statute (no §101) | 1 (100%) |
How the docket's pending cases split across USPTO tech-center bands.
Manual office-action response work runs about 10 hours per case. The time-saved bands below show what IP Author's prosecution pipeline typically delivers — a conservative 20% on the low end, 35% in the middle, 50% on the high end.
| Examiner | Apps on this docket | Allow rate | Interview lift |
|---|---|---|---|
| MARCHEWKA, MATTHEW R | 1 | 47.6% | +66.9% |
Multi-statute / §101-driven matters, or cases in front of an examiner with an allow rate under 30%. The top 1 ordered by deadline are shown.
| App # | Title | Examiner | Due in |
|---|---|---|---|
| 19156889 | A DEVICE FOR IMPACT PROTECTION | MARCHEWKA, MATTHEW R | 20d |
Cases in front of an examiner whose interview lift is 10 percentage points or more — i.e. interviewed cases historically resolve more favorably than non-interviewed ones. The top 1 ordered by deadline are shown.
| App # | Title | Examiner | Due in |
|---|---|---|---|
| 19156889 | A DEVICE FOR IMPACT PROTECTION | MARCHEWKA, MATTHEW R | 20d |
| Art Unit | Apps |
|---|---|
| 3732 | 1 |
| App # | Title | Examiner | Art Unit | Statutes | Status | Due in | AI | Filed |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 19156889 | A DEVICE FOR IMPACT PROTECTION | MARCHEWKA, MATTHEW R | 3732 | §103§112 | Final Rejection | 20d | Pending | Aug 15, 2025 |
IP Author helps IP teams respond to office actions faster with AI-generated responses, examiner analytics, and prosecution intelligence.
Start Free TrialBrite Wind Consulting Limited has 1 pending office actions as of October 2026, spread across 1 art units and 1 examiners.
Matthew R Marchewka has the most, with 1 of Brite Wind Consulting Limited's pending office actions.
Mostly Medical Devices & Mechanical Engineering (USPTO Tech Center 3700), based on where its pending office actions are examined.
