Prosecution Insights
Last updated: October 04, 2026

Brixton Biosciences Inc.

Technology areas: Biotechnology & Pharmaceuticals • Medical Devices & Mechanical Engineering

2 pending office actions • 2 art units • 2 examiners • 0 of 2 (0%) have an AI response strategy ready

Analysis

Brixton Biosciences Inc. maintains 2 pending office actions in the Medical Devices & Mechanical Engineering technology area. These matters are distributed across 2 distinct examiners and 2 distinct art units, reflecting a diversified prosecution landscape despite the small volume of active cases. This distribution means that the company must navigate the preferences and requirements of 2 different points of contact at the patent office simultaneously. The presence of 2 distinct art units suggests that the technology being patented may span different sub-specialties within the broader engineering field. Practitioners must coordinate strategies across 2 different art units to address the current requirements of the portfolio.

AVIGAN, ADAM JOSEPH is the busiest examiner for the company, with 1 pending office action under review. This means the 2 pending actions are split evenly among the 2 examiners involved, as the busiest examiner pending count is only 1. Since no single examiner holds a majority of the pending cases, the legal team should be prepared for potentially different examiner behaviors and timelines. Monitoring the 2 distinct examiners will be necessary to maintain a cohesive prosecution strategy for the company's medical device innovations. The fact that no examiner manages more than 1 pending office action indicates a balanced workload across the current active docket.

Written from this page's own data; every figure is computed from USPTO records and verified before publication.

Portfolio Summary

2
Total Pending OAs
1
Non-Final OAs
1
Final Rejections
0
Advisory / Quayle

Response Deadline Pressure

Based on the USPTO statutory response window for each pending office action. 1 of the docket's apps have a known mailing date; the rest are excluded from the tile counts.

1
Overdue
0
Due this week
0
Due this month
0
Due in next 60 days
0
Due later

Case Difficulty Mix

Difficulty is derived from the rejection statutes on the most recent pending office action. §101-driven and multi-statute cases are graded Hard; §112-only and obviousness-type double-patenting cases are graded Easy; everything else is Medium. "Unknown" means we have not yet parsed a statute for that office action.

2
Hard (100%)
0
Medium (0%)
0
Easy (0%)
0
Unknown (0%)

Rejection Statute Mix

BucketCases
Multi-statute (no §101)2 (100%)

Industry Mix

How the docket's pending cases split across USPTO tech-center bands.

1
Life Sciences
50% of docket
0
Information Tech
0% of docket
0
Communications
0% of docket
0
Semiconductors
0% of docket
1
Mechanical / Eng
50% of docket
0
Business / Other
0% of docket

Time-on-OA Estimate

Manual office-action response work runs about 10 hours per case. The time-saved bands below show what IP Author's prosecution pipeline typically delivers — a conservative 20% on the low end, 35% in the middle, 50% on the high end.

20 h
Manual time on pending OAs
4 h
Time saved (low, 20%)
7 h
Time saved (mid, 35%)
0.2 wks
FTE-weeks freed (mid)

Top Examiners on this docket

ExaminerApps on this docketAllow rateInterview lift
AVIGAN, ADAM JOSEPH 1 43.7% +16.3%
VIGIL, TORIANA NICHOLE 1 53.1% +24.1%

Hard Cases (2)

Multi-statute / §101-driven matters, or cases in front of an examiner with an allow rate under 30%. The top 2 ordered by deadline are shown.

App #TitleExaminerDue in
17582262 APPARATUS FOR CREATION OF INJECTABLE SLURRY AVIGAN, ADAM JOSEPH 44d overdue
17629206 METHODS OF CREATING A SUBSTANCE WITH DIFFERENT FREEZING POINTS BY ENCAPSULATION VIGIL, TORIANA NICHOLE —

Interview Candidates (2)

Cases in front of an examiner whose interview lift is 10 percentage points or more — i.e. interviewed cases historically resolve more favorably than non-interviewed ones. The top 2 ordered by deadline are shown.

App #TitleExaminerDue in
17582262 APPARATUS FOR CREATION OF INJECTABLE SLURRY AVIGAN, ADAM JOSEPH 44d overdue
17629206 METHODS OF CREATING A SUBSTANCE WITH DIFFERENT FREEZING POINTS BY ENCAPSULATION VIGIL, TORIANA NICHOLE —

Top Art Units

Art UnitApps
3794 1
1612 1

Pending Office Actions

App #TitleExaminerArt UnitStatutesStatusDue inAIFiled
17582262 APPARATUS FOR CREATION OF INJECTABLE SLURRY AVIGAN, ADAM JOSEPH 3794 §103§112 Final Rejection 44d overdue Pending Jan 24, 2022
17629206 METHODS OF CREATING A SUBSTANCE WITH DIFFERENT FREEZING POINTS BY ENCAPSULATION VIGIL, TORIANA NICHOLE 1612 §103§112 Non-Final OA — Pending Jan 21, 2022

Managing Brixton Biosciences Inc.'s Patent Portfolio?

IP Author helps IP teams respond to office actions faster with AI-generated responses, examiner analytics, and prosecution intelligence.

Start Free Trial

Sign in with your work email

Enter your email to receive a magic link. No password needed.

Personal email addresses (Gmail, Yahoo, etc.) are not accepted.

Free tier: 3 strategy analyses per month