Prosecution Insights
Prosecution Insights
Technology area: Computing & Software
3 pending office actions • 1 art units • 3 examiners • 0 of 3 (0%) have an AI response strategy ready • 5 patents granted in the last 365 days
Browserstack Limited currently manages 3 pending office actions within the Computing & Software technology area. These actions are assigned to 3 distinct examiners, but all are concentrated within 1 distinct art unit. This high level of art unit concentration suggests that the company's software innovations are being reviewed by a single specialized group at the USPTO. While the 3 distinct examiners are different, the shared 1 distinct art unit may lead to consistent application of legal standards.
WASEL, MOHAMED A is one of the examiners involved, currently overseeing 1 pending office action. This 1 pending office action is one of the 3 pending office actions in the portfolio. The fact that 3 distinct examiners are working within only 1 distinct art unit is notable, as it requires practitioners to manage three different personalities while navigating the specific policies of a single technical group. This structure provides a focused environment for the company's software-related prosecution. Practitioners should monitor the 3 pending office actions for common themes or requirements established by the 1 distinct art unit to streamline their prosecution strategy.
Based on the USPTO statutory response window for each pending office action. 1 of the docket's apps have a known mailing date; the rest are excluded from the tile counts.
Difficulty is derived from the rejection statutes on the most recent pending office action. §101-driven and multi-statute cases are graded Hard; §112-only and obviousness-type double-patenting cases are graded Easy; everything else is Medium. "Unknown" means we have not yet parsed a statute for that office action.
| Bucket | Cases |
|---|---|
| §103 only | 1 (33%) |
| Double-patenting only | 1 (33%) |
| No statute on record | 1 (33%) |
How the docket's pending cases split across USPTO tech-center bands.
Manual office-action response work runs about 10 hours per case. The time-saved bands below show what IP Author's prosecution pipeline typically delivers — a conservative 20% on the low end, 35% in the middle, 50% on the high end.
| Examiner | Apps on this docket | Allow rate | Interview lift |
|---|---|---|---|
| WASEL, MOHAMED A | 1 | 89.8% | +11.6% |
| SWEARINGEN, JEFFREY R | 1 | 76.3% | +21.3% |
| NGUYEN, BRANDON A | 1 | — | — |
Cases in front of an examiner with an allow rate of 80%+ where the difficulty is Easy or Medium. The top 1 ordered by deadline are shown.
| App # | Title | Examiner | Due in |
|---|---|---|---|
| 19239735 | DERIVING PROXY STABILITY WITHOUT NETWORK INSPECTION | WASEL, MOHAMED A | — |
Cases in front of an examiner whose interview lift is 10 percentage points or more — i.e. interviewed cases historically resolve more favorably than non-interviewed ones. The top 2 ordered by deadline are shown.
| App # | Title | Examiner | Due in |
|---|---|---|---|
| 19239735 | DERIVING PROXY STABILITY WITHOUT NETWORK INSPECTION | WASEL, MOHAMED A | — |
| 19032255 | MEDIA TRANSFER FOR REMOTE DEVICE INFRASTRUCTURE | SWEARINGEN, JEFFREY R | — |
| Art Unit | Apps |
|---|---|
| 2195 | 1 |
| App # | Title | Examiner | Art Unit | Statutes | Status | Due in | AI | Filed |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 19239735 | DERIVING PROXY STABILITY WITHOUT NETWORK INSPECTION | WASEL, MOHAMED A | — | DP | Non-Final OA | — | Pending | Jun 16, 2025 |
| 19032255 | MEDIA TRANSFER FOR REMOTE DEVICE INFRASTRUCTURE | SWEARINGEN, JEFFREY R | — | Other | Final Rejection | — | Pending | Jan 20, 2025 |
| 18373507 | VIDEO INJECTION SYSTEM | NGUYEN, BRANDON A | 2195 | §103 | Non-Final OA | 19d | Pending | Sep 27, 2023 |
IP Author helps IP teams respond to office actions faster with AI-generated responses, examiner analytics, and prosecution intelligence.
Start Free Trial