Prosecution Insights
Last updated: August 16, 2026

Bruin Biometrics LLC

8 pending office actions • 2 art units • 6 examiners • 0 of 8 (0%) have an AI response strategy ready • 2 patents granted in the last 365 days

Portfolio Summary

8
Total Pending OAs
5
Non-Final OAs
3
Final Rejections
0
Advisory / Quayle

Response Deadline Pressure

Based on the USPTO statutory response window for each pending office action. 3 of the docket's apps have a known mailing date; the rest are excluded from the tile counts.

2
Overdue
0
Due this week
0
Due this month
1
Due in next 60 days
0
Due later

Deadline Fire Line

Every pending office action with a known statutory deadline, placed on a days-until-due axis. Dots left of Today are overdue; the further right, the more runway. Cases that share a deadline window stack vertically. 3 of the docket's apps have a known mailing date.

-30dToday30d60d90d120d
Overdue (2)Due ≤ 60 days (1)

Case Difficulty Mix

Difficulty is derived from the rejection statutes on the most recent pending office action. §101-driven and multi-statute cases are graded Hard; §112-only and obviousness-type double-patenting cases are graded Easy; everything else is Medium. "Unknown" means we have not yet parsed a statute for that office action.

6
Hard (75%)
2
Medium (25%)
0
Easy (0%)
0
Unknown (0%)

Rejection Statute Mix

BucketCases
§101 only3 (38%)
§101 + other2 (25%)
§103 only2 (25%)
Multi-statute (no §101)1 (12%)

Industry Mix

How the docket's pending cases split across USPTO tech-center bands.

0
Life Sciences
0% of docket
0
Information Tech
0% of docket
0
Communications
0% of docket
0
Semiconductors
0% of docket
8
Mechanical / Eng
100% of docket
0
Business / Other
0% of docket

Time-on-OA Estimate

Manual office-action response work runs about 10 hours per case. The time-saved bands below show what IP Author's prosecution pipeline typically delivers — a conservative 20% on the low end, 35% in the middle, 50% on the high end.

80 h
Manual time on pending OAs
16 h
Time saved (low, 20%)
28 h
Time saved (mid, 35%)
0.7 wks
FTE-weeks freed (mid)

Top Examiners on this docket

ExaminerApps on this docketAllow rateInterview lift
FERNANDES, PATRICK M 3 59.8% +31.7%
YOON, CHANEL J 1 53.4% +39.7%
SANGHERA, STEVEN G.S. 1 30.0% +29.1%
NGUYEN, HUONG Q 1 45.7% +44.6%
HALPRIN, MOLLY SARA 1 38.9% +66.7%
XU, JUSTIN 1 59.6% +36.7%

Hard Cases (6)

Multi-statute / §101-driven matters, or cases in front of an examiner with an allow rate under 30%. The top 6 ordered by deadline are shown.

App #TitleExaminerDue in
17689580 Methods for Diagnosis and Treatment of Deep Tissue Injury Using Sub-Epidermal Moisture Measurements XU, JUSTIN 36d overdue
18159068 Providing a Continuity of Care Across Multiple Care Settings SANGHERA, STEVEN G.S. 4d overdue
18927312 Biocapacitance Sensor YOON, CHANEL J
18405868 APPARATUS AND METHODS FOR DETERMINING DAMAGED TISSUE USING SUB-EPIDERMAL MOISTURE MEASUREMENTS FERNANDES, PATRICK M
18064446 Apparatus and Methods for Determining Damaged Tissue Using Sub-Epidermal Moisture Measurements FERNANDES, PATRICK M
17700888 Apparatus and Methods for Determining Damaged Tissue Using Sub-Epidermal Moisture Measurements FERNANDES, PATRICK M

Interview Candidates (8)

Cases in front of an examiner whose interview lift is 10 percentage points or more — i.e. interviewed cases historically resolve more favorably than non-interviewed ones. The top 8 ordered by deadline are shown.

App #TitleExaminerDue in
17689580 Methods for Diagnosis and Treatment of Deep Tissue Injury Using Sub-Epidermal Moisture Measurements XU, JUSTIN 36d overdue
18159068 Providing a Continuity of Care Across Multiple Care Settings SANGHERA, STEVEN G.S. 4d overdue
18150650 Bisymmetric Comparison of Sub-Epidermal Moisture Values NGUYEN, HUONG Q 35d
18927312 Biocapacitance Sensor YOON, CHANEL J
18405868 APPARATUS AND METHODS FOR DETERMINING DAMAGED TISSUE USING SUB-EPIDERMAL MOISTURE MEASUREMENTS FERNANDES, PATRICK M
18064446 Apparatus and Methods for Determining Damaged Tissue Using Sub-Epidermal Moisture Measurements FERNANDES, PATRICK M
17776784 Transepidermal Water Loss HALPRIN, MOLLY SARA
17700888 Apparatus and Methods for Determining Damaged Tissue Using Sub-Epidermal Moisture Measurements FERNANDES, PATRICK M

Top Art Units

Art UnitApps
3791 7
3684 1

Pending Office Actions

App #TitleExaminerArt UnitStatutesStatusDue inAIFiled
18927312 Biocapacitance Sensor YOON, CHANEL J 3791 §103§112 Non-Final OA Pending Oct 25, 2024
18405868 APPARATUS AND METHODS FOR DETERMINING DAMAGED TISSUE USING SUB-EPIDERMAL MOISTURE MEASUREMENTS FERNANDES, PATRICK M 3791 §101§112DP Non-Final OA Pending Jan 05, 2024
18159068 Providing a Continuity of Care Across Multiple Care Settings SANGHERA, STEVEN G.S. 3684 §101 Non-Final OA 4d overdue Pending Jan 24, 2023
18150650 Bisymmetric Comparison of Sub-Epidermal Moisture Values NGUYEN, HUONG Q 3791 §103 Final Rejection 35d Pending Jan 05, 2023
18064446 Apparatus and Methods for Determining Damaged Tissue Using Sub-Epidermal Moisture Measurements FERNANDES, PATRICK M 3791 §101Other Final Rejection Pending Dec 12, 2022
17776784 Transepidermal Water Loss HALPRIN, MOLLY SARA 3791 §103 Final Rejection Pending May 13, 2022
17700888 Apparatus and Methods for Determining Damaged Tissue Using Sub-Epidermal Moisture Measurements FERNANDES, PATRICK M 3791 §101DPOther Non-Final OA Pending Mar 22, 2022
17689580 Methods for Diagnosis and Treatment of Deep Tissue Injury Using Sub-Epidermal Moisture Measurements XU, JUSTIN 3791 §101 Non-Final OA 36d overdue Pending Mar 08, 2022

Managing Bruin Biometrics LLC's Patent Portfolio?

IP Author helps IP teams respond to office actions faster with AI-generated responses, examiner analytics, and prosecution intelligence.

Start Free Trial

Sign in with your work email

Enter your email to receive a magic link. No password needed.

Personal email addresses (Gmail, Yahoo, etc.) are not accepted.

Free tier: 3 strategy analyses per month