Technology area: Transportation, E-Commerce & Mechanical Systems
3 pending office actions • 2 art units • 3 examiners • 0 of 3 (0%) have an AI response strategy ready
C G Tae Technology Inc. currently has 3 pending office actions in the Transportation, E-Commerce & Mechanical Systems technology area. These 3 actions are handled by 3 distinct examiners, meaning each examiner is responsible for one pending matter. The portfolio is slightly more concentrated at the administrative level, with the 3 actions residing in 2 distinct art units.
WAESCO, JOSEPH M is the busiest examiner, holding 1 pending office action. Given the 3 pending office actions total, the company's current prosecution footprint is small. Practitioners must engage with 3 distinct examiners, but the fact that they are located in only 2 distinct art units may provide some consistency in the general examination environment. Each of the 3 pending office actions represents a significant portion of the company's active USPTO matters. This decentralized structure requires practitioners to be highly adaptable to the specific feedback of the 3 distinct examiners. Since there is concentration in 2 distinct art units, the company may find some procedural commonalities across the matters. Every pending office action is highly consequential for the firm's overall intellectual property position in the Transportation, E-Commerce & Mechanical Systems sector.
Difficulty is derived from the rejection statutes on the most recent pending office action. §101-driven and multi-statute cases are graded Hard; §112-only and obviousness-type double-patenting cases are graded Easy; everything else is Medium. "Unknown" means we have not yet parsed a statute for that office action.
| Bucket | Cases |
|---|---|
| §101 only | 1 (33%) |
| §101 + other | 2 (67%) |
How the docket's pending cases split across USPTO tech-center bands.
Manual office-action response work runs about 10 hours per case. The time-saved bands below show what IP Author's prosecution pipeline typically delivers — a conservative 20% on the low end, 35% in the middle, 50% on the high end.
| Examiner | Apps on this docket | Allow rate | Interview lift |
|---|---|---|---|
| WAESCO, JOSEPH M | 1 | 46.7% | +42.1% |
| PUJOLS-CRUZ, MARJORIE | 1 | 18.4% | +27.1% |
| MANSFIELD, THOMAS L | 1 | 51.1% | +32.8% |
Multi-statute / §101-driven matters, or cases in front of an examiner with an allow rate under 30%. The top 3 ordered by deadline are shown.
| App # | Title | Examiner | Due in |
|---|---|---|---|
| 19157574 | METHOD FOR ANALYZING AND PRESENTING APPLICATION USAGE | WAESCO, JOSEPH M | — |
| 19101336 | METHOD FOR REUSING SCHEDULE INFORMATION | PUJOLS-CRUZ, MARJORIE | — |
| 19101338 | METHOD FOR INPUTTING CATEGORIZED SCHEDULE BY USING CALENDAR APPLICATION | MANSFIELD, THOMAS L | — |
Cases in front of an examiner whose interview lift is 10 percentage points or more — i.e. interviewed cases historically resolve more favorably than non-interviewed ones. The top 3 ordered by deadline are shown.
| App # | Title | Examiner | Due in |
|---|---|---|---|
| 19157574 | METHOD FOR ANALYZING AND PRESENTING APPLICATION USAGE | WAESCO, JOSEPH M | — |
| 19101336 | METHOD FOR REUSING SCHEDULE INFORMATION | PUJOLS-CRUZ, MARJORIE | — |
| 19101338 | METHOD FOR INPUTTING CATEGORIZED SCHEDULE BY USING CALENDAR APPLICATION | MANSFIELD, THOMAS L | — |
| Art Unit | Apps |
|---|---|
| 3624 | 2 |
| 3625 | 1 |
| App # | Title | Examiner | Art Unit | Statutes | Status | Due in | AI | Filed |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 19157574 | METHOD FOR ANALYZING AND PRESENTING APPLICATION USAGE | WAESCO, JOSEPH M | 3625 | §101 | Non-Final OA | — | Pending | Aug 18, 2025 |
| 19101336 | METHOD FOR REUSING SCHEDULE INFORMATION | PUJOLS-CRUZ, MARJORIE | 3624 | §101§102§103 | Non-Final OA | — | Pending | Jul 15, 2025 |
| 19101338 | METHOD FOR INPUTTING CATEGORIZED SCHEDULE BY USING CALENDAR APPLICATION | MANSFIELD, THOMAS L | 3624 | §101§102 | Non-Final OA | — | Pending | Feb 05, 2025 |
IP Author helps IP teams respond to office actions faster with AI-generated responses, examiner analytics, and prosecution intelligence.
Start Free TrialC G Tae Technology Inc. has 3 pending office actions as of October 2026, spread across 2 art units and 3 examiners.
Joseph M Waesco has the most, with 1 of C G Tae Technology Inc.'s pending office actions.
Mostly Transportation, E-Commerce & Mechanical Systems (USPTO Tech Center 3600), based on where its pending office actions are examined.
