Prosecution Insights
Last updated: October 02, 2026

C I Takiron Corporation

Technology area: Chemistry & Materials

1 pending office actions • 1 art units • 1 examiners • 0 of 1 (0%) have an AI response strategy ready • 6 patents granted in the last 365 days

Analysis

C I Takiron Corporation has 1 pending office action in the Chemistry & Materials technology area. This action is being handled by 1 distinct examiner, SHAH, SAMIR. The portfolio is active in 1 distinct art unit, showing a focused technical scope for the pending application. This 1 pending office action represents the company's current active prosecution workload.

The busiest examiner, SHAH, SAMIR, is managing 1 busiest examiner pending action. This matches the company's total of 1 pending office action. Because there is only 1 distinct examiner and 1 distinct art unit, the prosecution is centralized. Practitioners should tailor their approach to the specific tendencies of this single examiner. The technical requirements of the 1 distinct art unit will be a primary factor in the prosecution strategy. With the entire pending portfolio under SHAH, SAMIR, the company can focus its resources on a single, targeted response. This streamlined structure in the Chemistry & Materials area allows for a highly efficient patent acquisition process. Practitioners should carefully review the examiner's history to ensure a successful outcome.

Written from this page's own data; every figure is computed from USPTO records and verified before publication.

Portfolio Summary

1
Total Pending OAs
1
Non-Final OAs
0
Final Rejections
0
Advisory / Quayle

Case Difficulty Mix

Difficulty is derived from the rejection statutes on the most recent pending office action. §101-driven and multi-statute cases are graded Hard; §112-only and obviousness-type double-patenting cases are graded Easy; everything else is Medium. "Unknown" means we have not yet parsed a statute for that office action.

0
Hard (0%)
1
Medium (100%)
0
Easy (0%)
0
Unknown (0%)

Rejection Statute Mix

BucketCases
§102 only1 (100%)

Industry Mix

How the docket's pending cases split across USPTO tech-center bands.

1
Life Sciences
100% of docket
0
Information Tech
0% of docket
0
Communications
0% of docket
0
Semiconductors
0% of docket
0
Mechanical / Eng
0% of docket
0
Business / Other
0% of docket

Time-on-OA Estimate

Manual office-action response work runs about 10 hours per case. The time-saved bands below show what IP Author's prosecution pipeline typically delivers — a conservative 20% on the low end, 35% in the middle, 50% on the high end.

10 h
Manual time on pending OAs
2 h
Time saved (low, 20%)
4 h
Time saved (mid, 35%)
0.1 wks
FTE-weeks freed (mid)

Top Examiners on this docket

ExaminerApps on this docketAllow rateInterview lift
SHAH, SAMIR 1 36.4% +34.9%

Interview Candidates (1)

Cases in front of an examiner whose interview lift is 10 percentage points or more — i.e. interviewed cases historically resolve more favorably than non-interviewed ones. The top 1 ordered by deadline are shown.

App #TitleExaminerDue in
18996590 STRETCHED FILM AND METHOD FOR PRODUCING SAME SHAH, SAMIR —

Top Art Units

Art UnitApps
1787 1

Pending Office Actions

App #TitleExaminerArt UnitStatutesStatusDue inAIFiled
18996590 STRETCHED FILM AND METHOD FOR PRODUCING SAME SHAH, SAMIR 1787 §102 Non-Final OA — Pending Jan 17, 2025

Managing C I Takiron Corporation's Patent Portfolio?

IP Author helps IP teams respond to office actions faster with AI-generated responses, examiner analytics, and prosecution intelligence.

Start Free Trial

Sign in with your work email

Enter your email to receive a magic link. No password needed.

Personal email addresses (Gmail, Yahoo, etc.) are not accepted.

Free tier: 3 strategy analyses per month