Prosecution Insights
Last updated: October 25, 2026

C-Tech United Corporation

Technology area: Chemistry & Materials

1 pending office actions • 1 art units • 1 examiners • 0 of 1 (0%) have an AI response strategy ready • 2 patents granted in the last 365 days

Analysis

C-Tech United Corporation is engaged in the prosecution of 1 pending office action in the Chemistry & Materials technology area. This single active matter is assigned to 1 distinct examiner, HUFFMAN, JULIAN D, who is the busiest examiner for the company. The prosecution is localized within a distinct art unit, indicating a focused administrative path for the current portfolio.

In the field of Chemistry & Materials, this concentration means that the company's immediate patenting success is tied to the specific review of HUFFMAN, JULIAN D. The presence of a single distinct art unit suggests that the technical scope of the pending application is well-defined within a single administrative category. Practitioners can see that the entirety of the company's current workload is managed by a single examiner and art unit. This focused administrative footprint suggests that the company's current patenting efforts are concentrated on a specific technical advancement within the chemistry sector.

Written from this page's own data; every figure is computed from USPTO records and verified before publication.

Portfolio Summary

1
Total Pending OAs
1
Non-Final OAs
0
Final Rejections
0
Advisory / Quayle

Case Difficulty Mix

Difficulty is derived from the rejection statutes on the most recent pending office action. §101-driven and multi-statute cases are graded Hard; §112-only and obviousness-type double-patenting cases are graded Easy; everything else is Medium. "Unknown" means we have not yet parsed a statute for that office action.

0
Hard (0%)
1
Medium (100%)
0
Easy (0%)
0
Unknown (0%)

Rejection Statute Mix

BucketCases
Double-patenting + other1 (100%)

Industry Mix

How the docket's pending cases split across USPTO tech-center bands.

1
Life Sciences
100% of docket
0
Information Tech
0% of docket
0
Communications
0% of docket
0
Semiconductors
0% of docket
0
Mechanical / Eng
0% of docket
0
Business / Other
0% of docket

Time-on-OA Estimate

Manual office-action response work runs about 10 hours per case. The time-saved bands below show what IP Author's prosecution pipeline typically delivers — a conservative 20% on the low end, 35% in the middle, 50% on the high end.

10 h
Manual time on pending OAs
2 h
Time saved (low, 20%)
4 h
Time saved (mid, 35%)
0.1 wks
FTE-weeks freed (mid)

Top Examiners on this docket

ExaminerApps on this docketAllow rateInterview lift
HUFFMAN, JULIAN D 1 79.4% +4.6%

Top Art Units

Art UnitApps
1788 1

Pending Office Actions

App #TitleExaminerArt UnitStatutesStatusDue inAIFiled
18457355 BATTERY DEVICE AND BATTERY MANAGEMENT METHOD HUFFMAN, JULIAN D 1788 §103§112DP Non-Final OA — Pending Aug 29, 2023

Managing C-Tech United Corporation's Patent Portfolio?

IP Author helps IP teams respond to office actions faster with AI-generated responses, examiner analytics, and prosecution intelligence.

Start Free Trial

Frequently Asked Questions

How many pending USPTO office actions does C-Tech United Corporation have?

C-Tech United Corporation has 1 pending office actions as of October 2026, spread across 1 art units and 1 examiners.

Which USPTO examiner handles the most C-Tech United Corporation applications?

Julian D Huffman has the most, with 1 of C-Tech United Corporation's pending office actions.

What technology area are C-Tech United Corporation's patent applications in?

Mostly Chemistry & Materials (USPTO Tech Center 1700), based on where its pending office actions are examined.

Sign in with your work email

Enter your email to receive a magic link. No password needed.

Personal email addresses (Gmail, Yahoo, etc.) are not accepted.

Free tier: 3 strategy analyses per month