Prosecution Insights
Last updated: October 25, 2026

C4 Therapeutics Inc.

Technology area: Biotechnology & Pharmaceuticals

4 pending office actions • 4 art units • 4 examiners • 0 of 4 (0%) have an AI response strategy ready • 13 patents granted in the last 365 days

Analysis

C4 Therapeutics Inc. currently manages 5 pending office actions within the Biotechnology & Pharmaceuticals technology area. This portfolio is distributed across 4 distinct art units, indicating a moderate level of specialization in its patent filings. The prosecution workload involves 5 distinct examiners, which suggests that each pending matter is being handled by a different individual.

HEITMEIER, KENDALL NICOLE is identified as the busiest examiner for this portfolio, currently overseeing 1 pending office action. This distribution among 5 distinct examiners means that no single examiner holds a concentrated portion of the company's active cases. The presence of 4 distinct art units for these 5 actions reflects a focused but slightly varied technical scope within the broader biotechnology sector.

For practitioners, the 1 to 1 ratio of pending office actions to distinct examiners suggests a fragmented prosecution landscape. With 5 distinct examiners involved, the company must navigate 5 different sets of examiner preferences and styles. The concentration of 5 pending office actions within 4 distinct art units further implies that while the technology is specialized, it touches upon several specific technical classifications.

Written from this page's own data; every figure is computed from USPTO records and verified before publication.

Portfolio Summary

4
Total Pending OAs
2
Non-Final OAs
2
Final Rejections
0
Advisory / Quayle

Response Deadline Pressure

Based on the USPTO statutory response window for each pending office action. 1 of the docket's apps have a known mailing date; the rest are excluded from the tile counts.

0
Overdue
0
Due this week
1
Due this month
0
Due in next 60 days
0
Due later

Case Difficulty Mix

Difficulty is derived from the rejection statutes on the most recent pending office action. §101-driven and multi-statute cases are graded Hard; §112-only and obviousness-type double-patenting cases are graded Easy; everything else is Medium. "Unknown" means we have not yet parsed a statute for that office action.

0
Hard (0%)
2
Medium (50%)
2
Easy (50%)
0
Unknown (0%)

Rejection Statute Mix

BucketCases
§103 only1 (25%)
Double-patenting only2 (50%)
Double-patenting + other1 (25%)

Industry Mix

How the docket's pending cases split across USPTO tech-center bands.

4
Life Sciences
100% of docket
0
Information Tech
0% of docket
0
Communications
0% of docket
0
Semiconductors
0% of docket
0
Mechanical / Eng
0% of docket
0
Business / Other
0% of docket

Time-on-OA Estimate

Manual office-action response work runs about 10 hours per case. The time-saved bands below show what IP Author's prosecution pipeline typically delivers — a conservative 20% on the low end, 35% in the middle, 50% on the high end.

40 h
Manual time on pending OAs
8 h
Time saved (low, 20%)
14 h
Time saved (mid, 35%)
0.3 wks
FTE-weeks freed (mid)

Top Examiners on this docket

ExaminerApps on this docketAllow rateInterview lift
SHIAO, REI TSANG 1 79.9% -33.5%
HASTINGS, ALISON AZAR 1 62.5% +42.1%
AULAKH, CHARANJIT 1 80.7% -14.5%
ELENISTE, PIERRE PAUL 1 35.4% +31.1%

Quick Wins (1)

Cases in front of an examiner with an allow rate of 80%+ where the difficulty is Easy or Medium. The top 1 ordered by deadline are shown.

App #TitleExaminerDue in
18534395 THERAPEUTICS FOR THE DEGRADATION OF MUTANT BRAF AULAKH, CHARANJIT —

Interview Candidates (2)

Cases in front of an examiner whose interview lift is 10 percentage points or more — i.e. interviewed cases historically resolve more favorably than non-interviewed ones. The top 2 ordered by deadline are shown.

App #TitleExaminerDue in
18516589 EGFR Degraders to Treat Cancer Metastasis to the Brain or CNS ELENISTE, PIERRE PAUL 14d
18576933 COMPOUNDS FOR TARGETING DEGRADATION OF IRAK4 PROTEINS HASTINGS, ALISON AZAR —

Top Art Units

Art UnitApps
1691 1
1627 1
1621 1
1622 1

Pending Office Actions

App #TitleExaminerArt UnitStatutesStatusDue inAIFiled
18774801 SPIROCYCLIC DEGRONIMERS FOR TARGET PROTEIN DEGRADATION SHIAO, REI TSANG 1691 §112DP Non-Final OA — Pending Jul 16, 2024
18576933 COMPOUNDS FOR TARGETING DEGRADATION OF IRAK4 PROTEINS HASTINGS, ALISON AZAR 1627 §103 Final Rejection — Pending Jan 05, 2024
18534395 THERAPEUTICS FOR THE DEGRADATION OF MUTANT BRAF AULAKH, CHARANJIT 1621 DP Non-Final OA — Pending Dec 08, 2023
18516589 EGFR Degraders to Treat Cancer Metastasis to the Brain or CNS ELENISTE, PIERRE PAUL 1622 DP Final Rejection 14d Pending Nov 21, 2023

Managing C4 Therapeutics Inc.'s Patent Portfolio?

IP Author helps IP teams respond to office actions faster with AI-generated responses, examiner analytics, and prosecution intelligence.

Start Free Trial

Frequently Asked Questions

How many pending USPTO office actions does C4 Therapeutics Inc. have?

C4 Therapeutics Inc. has 4 pending office actions as of October 2026, spread across 4 art units and 4 examiners.

Which USPTO examiner handles the most C4 Therapeutics Inc. applications?

Rei Tsang Shiao has the most, with 1 of C4 Therapeutics Inc.'s pending office actions.

What technology area are C4 Therapeutics Inc.'s patent applications in?

Mostly Biotechnology & Pharmaceuticals (USPTO Tech Center 1600), based on where its pending office actions are examined.

Sign in with your work email

Enter your email to receive a magic link. No password needed.

Personal email addresses (Gmail, Yahoo, etc.) are not accepted.

Free tier: 3 strategy analyses per month