Prosecution Insights
Last updated: October 25, 2026

Cabot Corporation

Technology area: Chemistry & Materials

3 pending office actions • 3 art units • 3 examiners • 0 of 3 (0%) have an AI response strategy ready • 1 patents granted in the last 365 days

Analysis

Cabot Corporation currently manages 3 pending office actions within the Chemistry & Materials technology area. The portfolio exhibits a high degree of dispersion, as these 3 actions are spread across 3 distinct examiners and 3 distinct art units. This one-to-one ratio between actions, examiners, and art units indicates a diverse range of technical sub-specialties or varied filing strategies within the company's chemical portfolio.

The busiest examiner for the portfolio is VAJDA, PETER L, who is responsible for 1 pending office action. Since each of the 3 pending actions is assigned to a different examiner, no single individual dominates the current prosecution landscape. This lack of concentration means that practitioners cannot rely on a single examiner's history to predict outcomes across the portfolio. Each application represents a unique interaction with a different part of the patent office's administrative structure.

Operating across 3 distinct art units within Chemistry & Materials suggests that Cabot Corporation is pursuing broad protection for its innovations. The administrative complexity is higher than a centralized portfolio, as each of the 3 pending matters requires engagement with a different examiner and potentially different art unit policies. Success in this environment depends on managing three unique prosecution tracks simultaneously while addressing the specific technical requirements of each distinct art unit.

Written from this page's own data; every figure is computed from USPTO records and verified before publication.

Portfolio Summary

3
Total Pending OAs
2
Non-Final OAs
0
Final Rejections
1
Advisory / Quayle

Response Deadline Pressure

Based on the USPTO statutory response window for each pending office action. 2 of the docket's apps have a known mailing date; the rest are excluded from the tile counts.

0
Overdue
0
Due this week
0
Due this month
1
Due in next 60 days
1
Due later

Case Difficulty Mix

Difficulty is derived from the rejection statutes on the most recent pending office action. §101-driven and multi-statute cases are graded Hard; §112-only and obviousness-type double-patenting cases are graded Easy; everything else is Medium. "Unknown" means we have not yet parsed a statute for that office action.

1
Hard (33%)
2
Medium (67%)
0
Easy (0%)
0
Unknown (0%)

Rejection Statute Mix

BucketCases
§103 only2 (67%)
Multi-statute (no §101)1 (33%)

Industry Mix

How the docket's pending cases split across USPTO tech-center bands.

3
Life Sciences
100% of docket
0
Information Tech
0% of docket
0
Communications
0% of docket
0
Semiconductors
0% of docket
0
Mechanical / Eng
0% of docket
0
Business / Other
0% of docket

Time-on-OA Estimate

Manual office-action response work runs about 10 hours per case. The time-saved bands below show what IP Author's prosecution pipeline typically delivers — a conservative 20% on the low end, 35% in the middle, 50% on the high end.

30 h
Manual time on pending OAs
6 h
Time saved (low, 20%)
10 h
Time saved (mid, 35%)
0.3 wks
FTE-weeks freed (mid)

Top Examiners on this docket

ExaminerApps on this docketAllow rateInterview lift
VAJDA, PETER L 1 75.1% +12.9%
LEE, DORIS L 1 58.7% +8.8%
RODD, CHRISTOPHER M 1 72.7% +11.8%

Hard Cases (1)

Multi-statute / §101-driven matters, or cases in front of an examiner with an allow rate under 30%. The top 1 ordered by deadline are shown.

App #TitleExaminerDue in
17591853 SILICA REINFORCED THERMOPLASTIC POLYURETHANES RODD, CHRISTOPHER M 53d

Interview Candidates (2)

Cases in front of an examiner whose interview lift is 10 percentage points or more — i.e. interviewed cases historically resolve more favorably than non-interviewed ones. The top 2 ordered by deadline are shown.

App #TitleExaminerDue in
17591853 SILICA REINFORCED THERMOPLASTIC POLYURETHANES RODD, CHRISTOPHER M 53d
18750344 COMPOSITE PARTICLES FOR TONER ADDITIVES VAJDA, PETER L —

Top Art Units

Art UnitApps
1737 1
1764 1
1766 1

Pending Office Actions

App #TitleExaminerArt UnitStatutesStatusDue inAIFiled
18750344 COMPOSITE PARTICLES FOR TONER ADDITIVES VAJDA, PETER L 1737 §103 Non-Final OA — Pending Jun 21, 2024
17801362 SILICONE-BASED COMPOSITIONS CONTAINING CARBON NANOSTRUCTURES FOR CONDUCTIVE AND EMI SHIELDING APPLICATIONS LEE, DORIS L 1764 §103 Non-Final OA 63d Pending Aug 22, 2022
17591853 SILICA REINFORCED THERMOPLASTIC POLYURETHANES RODD, CHRISTOPHER M 1766 §102§103 Non-Final OA 53d Pending Feb 03, 2022

Managing Cabot Corporation's Patent Portfolio?

IP Author helps IP teams respond to office actions faster with AI-generated responses, examiner analytics, and prosecution intelligence.

Start Free Trial

Frequently Asked Questions

How many pending USPTO office actions does Cabot Corporation have?

Cabot Corporation has 3 pending office actions as of October 2026, spread across 3 art units and 3 examiners.

Which USPTO examiner handles the most Cabot Corporation applications?

Peter L Vajda has the most, with 1 of Cabot Corporation's pending office actions.

What technology area are Cabot Corporation's patent applications in?

Mostly Chemistry & Materials (USPTO Tech Center 1700), based on where its pending office actions are examined.

Sign in with your work email

Enter your email to receive a magic link. No password needed.

Personal email addresses (Gmail, Yahoo, etc.) are not accepted.

Free tier: 3 strategy analyses per month