Technology areas: Communications • Transportation, E-Commerce & Mechanical Systems
8 pending office actions • 8 art units • 8 examiners • 0 of 8 (0%) have an AI response strategy ready • 5 patents granted in the last 365 days
Calabrio Inc. has 8 pending office actions in Communications. The docket is spread across 8 examiners and 8 art units, meaning each pending matter has a distinct examiner and technical examination assignment.
SHAH, PARAS D is the busiest examiner, with 1 pending matter. There is no examiner concentration to support a unified response strategy. Counsel should instead track each application independently while maintaining consistent treatment of recurring communications technology concepts across the portfolio.
Based on the USPTO statutory response window for each pending office action. 4 of the docket's apps have a known mailing date; the rest are excluded from the tile counts.
Every pending office action with a known statutory deadline, placed on a days-until-due axis. Dots left of Today are overdue; the further right, the more runway. Cases that share a deadline window stack vertically. 4 of the docket's apps have a known mailing date.
Difficulty is derived from the rejection statutes on the most recent pending office action. §101-driven and multi-statute cases are graded Hard; §112-only and obviousness-type double-patenting cases are graded Easy; everything else is Medium. "Unknown" means we have not yet parsed a statute for that office action.
| Bucket | Cases |
|---|---|
| §101 only | 3 (38%) |
| §101 + other | 1 (12%) |
| §103 only | 4 (50%) |
How the docket's pending cases split across USPTO tech-center bands.
Manual office-action response work runs about 10 hours per case. The time-saved bands below show what IP Author's prosecution pipeline typically delivers — a conservative 20% on the low end, 35% in the middle, 50% on the high end.
| Examiner | Apps on this docket | Allow rate | Interview lift |
|---|---|---|---|
| SHAH, PARAS D | 1 | 73.7% | +30.6% |
| NGUYEN, QUYNH H | 1 | 87.4% | +16.9% |
| GILLS, KURTIS | 1 | 58.0% | +28.8% |
| BROWN, SARA GRACE | 1 | 28.8% | +32.3% |
| THOMAS-HOMESCU, ANNE L | 1 | 77.1% | +37.3% |
| WILLIS, AMANDA LYNN | 1 | 35.9% | +26.5% |
| LEE, PO HAN | 1 | 32.1% | +41.7% |
| MONIKANG, GEORGE C | 1 | 75.4% | +7.1% |
Multi-statute / §101-driven matters, or cases in front of an examiner with an allow rate under 30%. The top 4 ordered by deadline are shown.
| App # | Title | Examiner | Due in |
|---|---|---|---|
| 19061868 | INTELLIGENT PHRASE DERIVATION GENERATION | SHAH, PARAS D | — |
| 19005542 | SEARCHING CALLS BASED ON CONTEXTUAL SIMILARITY AMONG CALLS | NGUYEN, QUYNH H | — |
| 18147754 | AGENT ENGAGEMENT ANALYZER | BROWN, SARA GRACE | — |
| 18046469 | SYSTEMS AND METHODS FOR RAPPORT DETERMINATION | LEE, PO HAN | — |
Cases in front of an examiner whose interview lift is 10 percentage points or more — i.e. interviewed cases historically resolve more favorably than non-interviewed ones. The top 7 ordered by deadline are shown.
| App # | Title | Examiner | Due in |
|---|---|---|---|
| 18046890 | GENERATING SEARCH INSIGHT DATA | WILLIS, AMANDA LYNN | 28d |
| 18148741 | SYSTEM AND METHOD FOR OPTIMIZING LOCATION SCHEDULING ACROSS MULTIPLE WORK ENVIRONMENTS | GILLS, KURTIS | 63d |
| 18088494 | SYSTEMS AND METHODS FOR EVENT DRIVER DETECTION | THOMAS-HOMESCU, ANNE L | 65d |
| 19061868 | INTELLIGENT PHRASE DERIVATION GENERATION | SHAH, PARAS D | — |
| 19005542 | SEARCHING CALLS BASED ON CONTEXTUAL SIMILARITY AMONG CALLS | NGUYEN, QUYNH H | — |
| 18147754 | AGENT ENGAGEMENT ANALYZER | BROWN, SARA GRACE | — |
| 18046469 | SYSTEMS AND METHODS FOR RAPPORT DETERMINATION | LEE, PO HAN | — |
| Art Unit | Apps |
|---|---|
| 2653 | 1 |
| 2693 | 1 |
| 3624 | 1 |
| 3625 | 1 |
| 2656 | 1 |
| 2156 | 1 |
| 3623 | 1 |
| 2692 | 1 |
| App # | Title | Examiner | Art Unit | Statutes | Status | Due in | AI | Filed |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 19061868 | INTELLIGENT PHRASE DERIVATION GENERATION | SHAH, PARAS D | 2653 | §101DP | Non-Final OA | — | Pending | Feb 24, 2025 |
| 19005542 | SEARCHING CALLS BASED ON CONTEXTUAL SIMILARITY AMONG CALLS | NGUYEN, QUYNH H | 2693 | §101Other | Non-Final OA | — | Pending | Dec 30, 2024 |
| 18148741 | SYSTEM AND METHOD FOR OPTIMIZING LOCATION SCHEDULING ACROSS MULTIPLE WORK ENVIRONMENTS | GILLS, KURTIS | 3624 | §103 | Non-Final OA | 63d | Pending | Dec 30, 2022 |
| 18147754 | AGENT ENGAGEMENT ANALYZER | BROWN, SARA GRACE | 3625 | §101 | Final Rejection | — | Pending | Dec 29, 2022 |
| 18088494 | SYSTEMS AND METHODS FOR EVENT DRIVER DETECTION | THOMAS-HOMESCU, ANNE L | 2656 | §103 | Non-Final OA | 65d | Pending | Dec 23, 2022 |
| 18046890 | GENERATING SEARCH INSIGHT DATA | WILLIS, AMANDA LYNN | 2156 | §103 | Final Rejection | 28d | Pending | Oct 14, 2022 |
| 18046469 | SYSTEMS AND METHODS FOR RAPPORT DETERMINATION | LEE, PO HAN | 3623 | §101 | Non-Final OA | — | Pending | Oct 13, 2022 |
| 17549561 | ADVANCED SENTIMENT ANALYSIS | MONIKANG, GEORGE C | 2692 | §103 | Non-Final OA | 33d | Pending | Dec 13, 2021 |
IP Author helps IP teams respond to office actions faster with AI-generated responses, examiner analytics, and prosecution intelligence.
Start Free TrialCalabrio Inc. has 8 pending office actions as of October 2026, spread across 8 art units and 8 examiners.
Paras D Shah has the most, with 1 of Calabrio Inc.'s pending office actions.
Mostly Communications (USPTO Tech Center 2600), based on where its pending office actions are examined.
