Prosecution Insights
Prosecution Insights
1 pending office actions • 0 art units • 1 examiners • 0 of 1 (0%) have an AI response strategy ready
Calodar Ltd. currently manages 1 pending office action within its patent portfolio. This single active matter is assigned to 1 distinct examiner, indicating a highly concentrated prosecution effort at this stage. MIA M THOMAS serves as the busiest examiner for the company, overseeing 1 pending office action.
The concentration of the portfolio under 1 distinct examiner suggests that the current prosecution strategy is focused on a specific point of contact. Because the busiest examiner, MIA M THOMAS, is responsible for the company's active workload, the entirety of the prosecution rests with this individual. This centralized structure requires a focused approach to address the specific requirements of the assigned examiner.
Difficulty is derived from the rejection statutes on the most recent pending office action. §101-driven and multi-statute cases are graded Hard; §112-only and obviousness-type double-patenting cases are graded Easy; everything else is Medium. "Unknown" means we have not yet parsed a statute for that office action.
| Bucket | Cases |
|---|---|
| §103 only | 1 (100%) |
How the docket's pending cases split across USPTO tech-center bands.
Manual office-action response work runs about 10 hours per case. The time-saved bands below show what IP Author's prosecution pipeline typically delivers — a conservative 20% on the low end, 35% in the middle, 50% on the high end.
| Examiner | Apps on this docket | Allow rate | Interview lift |
|---|---|---|---|
| THOMAS, MIA M | 1 | 86.3% | +15.7% |
Cases in front of an examiner with an allow rate of 80%+ where the difficulty is Easy or Medium. The top 1 ordered by deadline are shown.
| App # | Title | Examiner | Due in |
|---|---|---|---|
| 18959428 | OPTICAL AND OTHER SENSORY PROCESSING OF COMPLEX OBJECTS | THOMAS, MIA M | — |
Cases in front of an examiner whose interview lift is 10 percentage points or more — i.e. interviewed cases historically resolve more favorably than non-interviewed ones. The top 1 ordered by deadline are shown.
| App # | Title | Examiner | Due in |
|---|---|---|---|
| 18959428 | OPTICAL AND OTHER SENSORY PROCESSING OF COMPLEX OBJECTS | THOMAS, MIA M | — |
| App # | Title | Examiner | Art Unit | Statutes | Status | Due in | AI | Filed |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 18959428 | OPTICAL AND OTHER SENSORY PROCESSING OF COMPLEX OBJECTS | THOMAS, MIA M | — | §103 | Non-Final OA | — | Pending | Nov 25, 2024 |
IP Author helps IP teams respond to office actions faster with AI-generated responses, examiner analytics, and prosecution intelligence.
Start Free Trial