Prosecution Insights
Prosecution Insights
Technology area: Medical Devices & Mechanical Engineering
1 pending office actions • 1 art units • 1 examiners • 0 of 1 (0%) have an AI response strategy ready • 3 patents granted in the last 365 days
Calyan Technologies Inc. has 1 pending office action within the Medical Devices & Mechanical Engineering technology area. KREMER, MATTHEW is the 1 distinct examiner responsible for this filing. The company's prosecution activity is restricted to a distinct art unit, showing a concentrated technical focus. KREMER, MATTHEW is the busiest examiner and holds the busiest examiner pending action.
With a distinct examiner and a distinct art unit, the current prosecution effort is highly focused. This streamlined process may allow for more direct communication with the patent office regarding the pending office action. Practitioners should note that the centralized examination in a distinct art unit suggests the technology is highly specialized within its field.
Based on the USPTO statutory response window for each pending office action. 1 of the docket's apps have a known mailing date; the rest are excluded from the tile counts.
Difficulty is derived from the rejection statutes on the most recent pending office action. §101-driven and multi-statute cases are graded Hard; §112-only and obviousness-type double-patenting cases are graded Easy; everything else is Medium. "Unknown" means we have not yet parsed a statute for that office action.
| Bucket | Cases |
|---|---|
| §103 only | 1 (100%) |
How the docket's pending cases split across USPTO tech-center bands.
Manual office-action response work runs about 10 hours per case. The time-saved bands below show what IP Author's prosecution pipeline typically delivers — a conservative 20% on the low end, 35% in the middle, 50% on the high end.
| Examiner | Apps on this docket | Allow rate | Interview lift |
|---|---|---|---|
| KREMER, MATTHEW | 1 | 43.6% | +52.2% |
Cases in front of an examiner whose interview lift is 10 percentage points or more — i.e. interviewed cases historically resolve more favorably than non-interviewed ones. The top 1 ordered by deadline are shown.
| App # | Title | Examiner | Due in |
|---|---|---|---|
| 17105439 | ANTENNAS FOR A SUBCUTANEOUS DEVICE | KREMER, MATTHEW | 127d overdue |
| Art Unit | Apps |
|---|---|
| 3791 | 1 |
| App # | Title | Examiner | Art Unit | Statutes | Status | Due in | AI | Filed |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 17105439 | ANTENNAS FOR A SUBCUTANEOUS DEVICE | KREMER, MATTHEW | 3791 | §103 | Non-Final OA | 127d overdue | Pending | Nov 25, 2020 |
IP Author helps IP teams respond to office actions faster with AI-generated responses, examiner analytics, and prosecution intelligence.
Start Free Trial