Prosecution Insights
Last updated: October 25, 2026

Calyxo Inc.

Technology area: Medical Devices & Mechanical Engineering

4 pending office actions • 3 art units • 4 examiners • 0 of 4 (0%) have an AI response strategy ready • 3 patents granted in the last 365 days

Analysis

Calyxo Inc. is currently managing 4 pending office actions within the Medical Devices & Mechanical Engineering technology area. These matters are handled by 4 distinct examiners, which reflects a one-to-one ratio between pending actions and assigned personnel. The prosecution activity is distributed across 3 distinct art units, indicating some technical overlap among the applications.

KNAUSS, CHRISTIAN D is designated as the busiest examiner for this portfolio, currently overseeing 1 pending office action. Since there are 4 pending office actions and 4 distinct examiners, no single examiner holds a majority of the workload. The 3 distinct art units involved suggest that the company's mechanical and medical device innovations are being reviewed by multiple specialized groups.

Practitioners should note that the 4 pending office actions require coordination across 4 distinct examiners. While the technology area is unified under Medical Devices & Mechanical Engineering, the 3 distinct art units may apply different examination standards. The involvement of KNAUSS, CHRISTIAN D with 1 pending office action is representative of the broader distribution across the 4 distinct examiners.

Written from this page's own data; every figure is computed from USPTO records and verified before publication.

Portfolio Summary

4
Total Pending OAs
3
Non-Final OAs
1
Final Rejections
0
Advisory / Quayle

Response Deadline Pressure

Based on the USPTO statutory response window for each pending office action. 1 of the docket's apps have a known mailing date; the rest are excluded from the tile counts.

0
Overdue
0
Due this week
0
Due this month
1
Due in next 60 days
0
Due later

Case Difficulty Mix

Difficulty is derived from the rejection statutes on the most recent pending office action. §101-driven and multi-statute cases are graded Hard; §112-only and obviousness-type double-patenting cases are graded Easy; everything else is Medium. "Unknown" means we have not yet parsed a statute for that office action.

1
Hard (25%)
3
Medium (75%)
0
Easy (0%)
0
Unknown (0%)

Rejection Statute Mix

BucketCases
§103 only2 (50%)
Double-patenting + other1 (25%)
Multi-statute (no §101)1 (25%)

Industry Mix

How the docket's pending cases split across USPTO tech-center bands.

0
Life Sciences
0% of docket
0
Information Tech
0% of docket
0
Communications
0% of docket
0
Semiconductors
0% of docket
4
Mechanical / Eng
100% of docket
0
Business / Other
0% of docket

Time-on-OA Estimate

Manual office-action response work runs about 10 hours per case. The time-saved bands below show what IP Author's prosecution pipeline typically delivers — a conservative 20% on the low end, 35% in the middle, 50% on the high end.

40 h
Manual time on pending OAs
8 h
Time saved (low, 20%)
14 h
Time saved (mid, 35%)
0.3 wks
FTE-weeks freed (mid)

Top Examiners on this docket

ExaminerApps on this docketAllow rateInterview lift
KNAUSS, CHRISTIAN D 1 71.3% +32.9%
ZAMORY, JUSTIN L 1 72.7% +17.6%
CHRISTIANSON, SKYLAR LINDSEY 1 60.9% +25.4%
MCGINNITY, JAMES RYAN 1 60.3% +49.8%

Hard Cases (1)

Multi-statute / §101-driven matters, or cases in front of an examiner with an allow rate under 30%. The top 1 ordered by deadline are shown.

App #TitleExaminerDue in
18766393 SYSTEM AND METHOD FOR GUIDED REMOVAL FROM AN IN VIVO SUBJECT KNAUSS, CHRISTIAN D 33d

Interview Candidates (4)

Cases in front of an examiner whose interview lift is 10 percentage points or more — i.e. interviewed cases historically resolve more favorably than non-interviewed ones. The top 4 ordered by deadline are shown.

App #TitleExaminerDue in
18766393 SYSTEM AND METHOD FOR GUIDED REMOVAL FROM AN IN VIVO SUBJECT KNAUSS, CHRISTIAN D 33d
18740388 FORCE-LIMITING ACCESS SYSTEM AND METHOD OF USE ZAMORY, JUSTIN L —
18373229 TOOL GUIDING DEVICE FOR KIDNEY STONE TREATMENT APPARATUS CHRISTIANSON, SKYLAR LINDSEY —
17489723 DEVICES AND METHODS FOR MINIMALLY INVASIVE KIDNEY STONE REMOVAL BY COMBINED ASPIRATION AND IRRIGATION MCGINNITY, JAMES RYAN —

Top Art Units

Art UnitApps
3771 2
3783 1
3792 1

Pending Office Actions

App #TitleExaminerArt UnitStatutesStatusDue inAIFiled
18766393 SYSTEM AND METHOD FOR GUIDED REMOVAL FROM AN IN VIVO SUBJECT KNAUSS, CHRISTIAN D 3771 §103§112 Final Rejection 33d Pending Jul 08, 2024
18740388 FORCE-LIMITING ACCESS SYSTEM AND METHOD OF USE ZAMORY, JUSTIN L 3783 §103 Non-Final OA — Pending Jun 11, 2024
18373229 TOOL GUIDING DEVICE FOR KIDNEY STONE TREATMENT APPARATUS CHRISTIANSON, SKYLAR LINDSEY 3792 §102§103DP Non-Final OA — Pending Sep 26, 2023
17489723 DEVICES AND METHODS FOR MINIMALLY INVASIVE KIDNEY STONE REMOVAL BY COMBINED ASPIRATION AND IRRIGATION MCGINNITY, JAMES RYAN 3771 §103 Non-Final OA — Pending Sep 29, 2021

Managing Calyxo Inc.'s Patent Portfolio?

IP Author helps IP teams respond to office actions faster with AI-generated responses, examiner analytics, and prosecution intelligence.

Start Free Trial

Frequently Asked Questions

How many pending USPTO office actions does Calyxo Inc. have?

Calyxo Inc. has 4 pending office actions as of October 2026, spread across 3 art units and 4 examiners.

Which USPTO examiner handles the most Calyxo Inc. applications?

Christian D Knauss has the most, with 1 of Calyxo Inc.'s pending office actions.

What technology area are Calyxo Inc.'s patent applications in?

Mostly Medical Devices & Mechanical Engineering (USPTO Tech Center 3700), based on where its pending office actions are examined.

Sign in with your work email

Enter your email to receive a magic link. No password needed.

Personal email addresses (Gmail, Yahoo, etc.) are not accepted.

Free tier: 3 strategy analyses per month