Prosecution Insights
Last updated: October 02, 2026

Calyxo Inc.

Technology area: Medical Devices & Mechanical Engineering

5 pending office actions • 2 art units • 5 examiners • 0 of 5 (0%) have an AI response strategy ready • 1 patents granted in the last 365 days

Analysis

Calyxo Inc. currently manages 5 pending office actions within the Medical Devices & Mechanical Engineering technology area. These actions are distributed across 2 distinct art units, indicating that the company's medical device innovations fall into at least 2 different technical categories at the USPTO. The involvement of 2 art units requires a prosecution strategy that can adapt to the different standards of each division.

The 5 pending office actions are handled by 5 distinct examiners, meaning that every pending case is assigned to a different individual. This distribution of 5 distinct examiners for 5 actions ensures that the company's patent outcomes are not controlled by a single individual's preferences. Instead, the company must manage five separate negotiations to advance its current portfolio.

NEAL, TIMOTHY JAY is the busiest examiner, with 1 pending office action currently assigned. Because the busiest examiner's load is only 1 of the 5 pending office actions, the workload is perfectly balanced across the examiner pool. This decentralized structure means that the progress of the company's patent applications is spread across multiple USPTO officials, reducing the impact of any single examiner's timeline.

Written from this page's own data; every figure is computed from USPTO records and verified before publication.

Portfolio Summary

5
Total Pending OAs
4
Non-Final OAs
1
Final Rejections
0
Advisory / Quayle

Response Deadline Pressure

Based on the USPTO statutory response window for each pending office action. 1 of the docket's apps have a known mailing date; the rest are excluded from the tile counts.

0
Overdue
0
Due this week
0
Due this month
1
Due in next 60 days
0
Due later

Case Difficulty Mix

Difficulty is derived from the rejection statutes on the most recent pending office action. §101-driven and multi-statute cases are graded Hard; §112-only and obviousness-type double-patenting cases are graded Easy; everything else is Medium. "Unknown" means we have not yet parsed a statute for that office action.

2
Hard (40%)
3
Medium (60%)
0
Easy (0%)
0
Unknown (0%)

Rejection Statute Mix

BucketCases
§101 + other1 (20%)
§103 only2 (40%)
Double-patenting + other1 (20%)
Multi-statute (no §101)1 (20%)

Industry Mix

How the docket's pending cases split across USPTO tech-center bands.

0
Life Sciences
0% of docket
0
Information Tech
0% of docket
0
Communications
0% of docket
0
Semiconductors
0% of docket
3
Mechanical / Eng
60% of docket
2
Business / Other
40% of docket

Time-on-OA Estimate

Manual office-action response work runs about 10 hours per case. The time-saved bands below show what IP Author's prosecution pipeline typically delivers — a conservative 20% on the low end, 35% in the middle, 50% on the high end.

50 h
Manual time on pending OAs
10 h
Time saved (low, 20%)
18 h
Time saved (mid, 35%)
0.4 wks
FTE-weeks freed (mid)

Top Examiners on this docket

ExaminerApps on this docketAllow rateInterview lift
NEAL, TIMOTHY JAY 1 77.8% +13.5%
KNAUSS, CHRISTIAN D 1 71.2% +33.4%
ZAMORY, JUSTIN L 1 72.9% +17.4%
CHRISTIANSON, SKYLAR LINDSEY 1 59.6% +27.7%
MCGINNITY, JAMES RYAN 1 60.3% +49.8%

Hard Cases (2)

Multi-statute / §101-driven matters, or cases in front of an examiner with an allow rate under 30%. The top 2 ordered by deadline are shown.

App #TitleExaminerDue in
18766393 SYSTEM AND METHOD FOR GUIDED REMOVAL FROM AN IN VIVO SUBJECT KNAUSS, CHRISTIAN D 33d
19055963 SYSTEM AND METHOD FOR DETECTING AND PREVENTING ORGAN COLLAPSE DURING ENDOSCOPY NEAL, TIMOTHY JAY —

Interview Candidates (5)

Cases in front of an examiner whose interview lift is 10 percentage points or more — i.e. interviewed cases historically resolve more favorably than non-interviewed ones. The top 5 ordered by deadline are shown.

App #TitleExaminerDue in
18766393 SYSTEM AND METHOD FOR GUIDED REMOVAL FROM AN IN VIVO SUBJECT KNAUSS, CHRISTIAN D 33d
19055963 SYSTEM AND METHOD FOR DETECTING AND PREVENTING ORGAN COLLAPSE DURING ENDOSCOPY NEAL, TIMOTHY JAY —
18740388 FORCE-LIMITING ACCESS SYSTEM AND METHOD OF USE ZAMORY, JUSTIN L —
18373229 TOOL GUIDING DEVICE FOR KIDNEY STONE TREATMENT APPARATUS CHRISTIANSON, SKYLAR LINDSEY —
17489723 DEVICES AND METHODS FOR MINIMALLY INVASIVE KIDNEY STONE REMOVAL BY COMBINED ASPIRATION AND IRRIGATION MCGINNITY, JAMES RYAN —

Top Art Units

Art UnitApps
3771 2
3792 1

Pending Office Actions

App #TitleExaminerArt UnitStatutesStatusDue inAIFiled
19055963 SYSTEM AND METHOD FOR DETECTING AND PREVENTING ORGAN COLLAPSE DURING ENDOSCOPY NEAL, TIMOTHY JAY — §101§112 Non-Final OA — Pending Feb 18, 2025
18766393 SYSTEM AND METHOD FOR GUIDED REMOVAL FROM AN IN VIVO SUBJECT KNAUSS, CHRISTIAN D 3771 §103§112 Final Rejection 33d Pending Jul 08, 2024
18740388 FORCE-LIMITING ACCESS SYSTEM AND METHOD OF USE ZAMORY, JUSTIN L — §103 Non-Final OA — Pending Jun 11, 2024
18373229 TOOL GUIDING DEVICE FOR KIDNEY STONE TREATMENT APPARATUS CHRISTIANSON, SKYLAR LINDSEY 3792 §102§103DP Non-Final OA — Pending Sep 26, 2023
17489723 DEVICES AND METHODS FOR MINIMALLY INVASIVE KIDNEY STONE REMOVAL BY COMBINED ASPIRATION AND IRRIGATION MCGINNITY, JAMES RYAN 3771 §103 Non-Final OA — Pending Sep 29, 2021

Managing Calyxo Inc.'s Patent Portfolio?

IP Author helps IP teams respond to office actions faster with AI-generated responses, examiner analytics, and prosecution intelligence.

Start Free Trial

Sign in with your work email

Enter your email to receive a magic link. No password needed.

Personal email addresses (Gmail, Yahoo, etc.) are not accepted.

Free tier: 3 strategy analyses per month