Technology area: Communications
2 pending office actions • 2 art units • 2 examiners • 0 of 2 (0%) have an AI response strategy ready
Capitol AI Inc. is currently managing 2 pending office actions within the Communications technology area. These 2 pending office actions are distributed across distinct art units, indicating that the company's communications innovations are being reviewed by different specialized groups. The involvement of distinct examiners means that each case is being handled by a different individual, which may lead to different prosecution timelines.
AZIZ, SHEZA ABDUL is the busiest examiner for the portfolio, currently overseeing 1 pending office action. Since she only handles 1 of the pending office actions, the company's risk is split between the examiners. This lack of concentration means that the company must maintain separate prosecution strategies for its Communications filings. Practitioners should be aware that the art units and examiners may have different interpretations of the prior art. Success in a case does not necessarily guarantee a similar result in the other, given the different individuals involved.
Difficulty is derived from the rejection statutes on the most recent pending office action. §101-driven and multi-statute cases are graded Hard; §112-only and obviousness-type double-patenting cases are graded Easy; everything else is Medium. "Unknown" means we have not yet parsed a statute for that office action.
| Bucket | Cases |
|---|---|
| §103 only | 2 (100%) |
How the docket's pending cases split across USPTO tech-center bands.
Manual office-action response work runs about 10 hours per case. The time-saved bands below show what IP Author's prosecution pipeline typically delivers — a conservative 20% on the low end, 35% in the middle, 50% on the high end.
| Examiner | Apps on this docket | Allow rate | Interview lift |
|---|---|---|---|
| AZIZ, SHEZA ABDUL | 1 | — | — |
| LE, MICHAEL | 1 | 66.0% | +21.7% |
Cases in front of an examiner whose interview lift is 10 percentage points or more — i.e. interviewed cases historically resolve more favorably than non-interviewed ones. The top 1 ordered by deadline are shown.
| App # | Title | Examiner | Due in |
|---|---|---|---|
| 18886784 | MODIFYING DATA VISUALIZATIONS TO PERMIT IMPROVED DISPLAY OF CLUSTERED DATA POINTS | LE, MICHAEL | — |
| Art Unit | Apps |
|---|---|
| 2657 | 1 |
| 2614 | 1 |
| App # | Title | Examiner | Art Unit | Statutes | Status | Due in | AI | Filed |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 18907167 | TREE-BASED CONTENT GENERATION USING GENERATIVE MODELS | AZIZ, SHEZA ABDUL | 2657 | §103 | Final Rejection | — | Pending | Oct 04, 2024 |
| 18886784 | MODIFYING DATA VISUALIZATIONS TO PERMIT IMPROVED DISPLAY OF CLUSTERED DATA POINTS | LE, MICHAEL | 2614 | §103 | Non-Final OA | — | Pending | Sep 16, 2024 |
IP Author helps IP teams respond to office actions faster with AI-generated responses, examiner analytics, and prosecution intelligence.
Start Free TrialCapitol AI Inc. has 2 pending office actions as of October 2026, spread across 2 art units and 2 examiners.
Sheza Abdul Aziz has the most, with 1 of Capitol AI Inc.'s pending office actions.
Mostly Communications (USPTO Tech Center 2600), based on where its pending office actions are examined.
