Prosecution Insights
Last updated: October 04, 2026

Capsida Inc.

Technology area: Biotechnology & Pharmaceuticals

1 pending office actions • 1 art units • 1 examiners • 0 of 1 (0%) have an AI response strategy ready

Analysis

Capsida Inc. has 1 pending office action in the Biotechnology & Pharmaceuticals technology area. This 1 action is assigned to 1 distinct examiner and 1 distinct art unit. This indicates a highly targeted prosecution strategy, with all current active matters residing within a single technical specialty at the patent office. This concentration allows for a specialized approach but also means the company's immediate patent success is tied to a narrow administrative channel within the biotechnology department.

The busiest examiner for this portfolio is BANERJEE, KOYELI, who is responsible for 1 pending office action. Since there is only 1 pending action in total, this examiner manages the entirety of the company's active prosecution. For practitioners, this means that the immediate future of the company's patent portfolio is tied to the specific examination practices of this 1 examiner and the standards of the 1 art unit. Success in this matter will require a deep understanding of the specific examination style and previous rulings associated with this 1 official, as there are no other active matters to provide alternative paths to allowance. The strategy must be precisely aligned with the examiner's historical preferences to ensure a successful result.

Written from this page's own data; every figure is computed from USPTO records and verified before publication.

Portfolio Summary

1
Total Pending OAs
1
Non-Final OAs
0
Final Rejections
0
Advisory / Quayle

Response Deadline Pressure

Based on the USPTO statutory response window for each pending office action. 1 of the docket's apps have a known mailing date; the rest are excluded from the tile counts.

0
Overdue
0
Due this week
1
Due this month
0
Due in next 60 days
0
Due later

Case Difficulty Mix

Difficulty is derived from the rejection statutes on the most recent pending office action. §101-driven and multi-statute cases are graded Hard; §112-only and obviousness-type double-patenting cases are graded Easy; everything else is Medium. "Unknown" means we have not yet parsed a statute for that office action.

0
Hard (0%)
0
Medium (0%)
1
Easy (100%)
0
Unknown (0%)

Rejection Statute Mix

BucketCases
§112 only1 (100%)

Industry Mix

How the docket's pending cases split across USPTO tech-center bands.

1
Life Sciences
100% of docket
0
Information Tech
0% of docket
0
Communications
0% of docket
0
Semiconductors
0% of docket
0
Mechanical / Eng
0% of docket
0
Business / Other
0% of docket

Time-on-OA Estimate

Manual office-action response work runs about 10 hours per case. The time-saved bands below show what IP Author's prosecution pipeline typically delivers — a conservative 20% on the low end, 35% in the middle, 50% on the high end.

10 h
Manual time on pending OAs
2 h
Time saved (low, 20%)
4 h
Time saved (mid, 35%)
0.1 wks
FTE-weeks freed (mid)

Top Examiners on this docket

ExaminerApps on this docketAllow rateInterview lift
BANERJEE, KOYELI 1 50.0% +0.0%

Top Art Units

Art UnitApps
1658 1

Pending Office Actions

App #TitleExaminerArt UnitStatutesStatusDue inAIFiled
18284407 SELECTED AAV COMPOSITIONS HAVING PREFERRED BRAIN ENRICHMENT BANERJEE, KOYELI 1658 §112 Non-Final OA 14d Pending Sep 27, 2023

Managing Capsida Inc.'s Patent Portfolio?

IP Author helps IP teams respond to office actions faster with AI-generated responses, examiner analytics, and prosecution intelligence.

Start Free Trial

Sign in with your work email

Enter your email to receive a magic link. No password needed.

Personal email addresses (Gmail, Yahoo, etc.) are not accepted.

Free tier: 3 strategy analyses per month