Prosecution Insights
Last updated: October 25, 2026

Carbon Autonomous Robotic Systems Inc.

Technology area: Networking & Security

6 pending office actions • 5 art units • 5 examiners • 0 of 6 (0%) have an AI response strategy ready • 2 patents granted in the last 365 days

Analysis

Carbon Autonomous Robotic Systems Inc. has 6 pending office actions in Networking & Security. The matters involve 5 distinct examiners and 5 distinct art units, showing broad assignment across art units with one repeated examiner assignment.

BEASLEY, DEIRDRE L is the busiest examiner, with 2 pending matters. Those cases support focused comparison of examiner treatment. The other matters should be managed through their individual examiner and art-unit records.

Written from this page's own data; every figure is computed from USPTO records and verified before publication.

Portfolio Summary

6
Total Pending OAs
2
Non-Final OAs
3
Final Rejections
1
Advisory / Quayle

Response Deadline Pressure

Based on the USPTO statutory response window for each pending office action. 1 of the docket's apps have a known mailing date; the rest are excluded from the tile counts.

1
Overdue
0
Due this week
0
Due this month
0
Due in next 60 days
0
Due later

Case Difficulty Mix

Difficulty is derived from the rejection statutes on the most recent pending office action. §101-driven and multi-statute cases are graded Hard; §112-only and obviousness-type double-patenting cases are graded Easy; everything else is Medium. "Unknown" means we have not yet parsed a statute for that office action.

3
Hard (50%)
3
Medium (50%)
0
Easy (0%)
0
Unknown (0%)

Rejection Statute Mix

BucketCases
§103 only3 (50%)
Multi-statute (no §101)3 (50%)

Industry Mix

How the docket's pending cases split across USPTO tech-center bands.

0
Life Sciences
0% of docket
4
Information Tech
67% of docket
1
Communications
17% of docket
1
Semiconductors
17% of docket
0
Mechanical / Eng
0% of docket
0
Business / Other
0% of docket

Time-on-OA Estimate

Manual office-action response work runs about 10 hours per case. The time-saved bands below show what IP Author's prosecution pipeline typically delivers — a conservative 20% on the low end, 35% in the middle, 50% on the high end.

60 h
Manual time on pending OAs
12 h
Time saved (low, 20%)
21 h
Time saved (mid, 35%)
0.5 wks
FTE-weeks freed (mid)

Top Examiners on this docket

ExaminerApps on this docketAllow rateInterview lift
BEASLEY, DEIRDRE L 2 61.8% +16.1%
HANSEN, JONATHAN M 1 79.4% +11.5%
DANG, PHILIP 1 77.6% +29.4%
CHANG, VINCENT WEN-LIANG 1 72.8% +26.1%
HUNTSINGER, PETER K 1 29.0% +17.6%

Hard Cases (4)

Multi-statute / §101-driven matters, or cases in front of an examiner with an allow rate under 30%. The top 4 ordered by deadline are shown.

App #TitleExaminerDue in
18098542 POINT LOCATION DETECTION SYSTEMS AND METHODS FOR OBJECT IDENTIFICATION AND TARGETING HUNTSINGER, PETER K 15d overdue
19248027 SYSTEMS AND METHODS FOR ENHANCEMENT OF OBJECT IDENTIFICATION AND TARGETING BEASLEY, DEIRDRE L —
19033411 HIGH INTENSITY ILLUMINATION SYSTEMS AND METHODS OF USE THEREOF HANSEN, JONATHAN M —
18893097 AUTONOMOUS LASER WEED ERADICATION DANG, PHILIP —

Interview Candidates (6)

Cases in front of an examiner whose interview lift is 10 percentage points or more — i.e. interviewed cases historically resolve more favorably than non-interviewed ones. The top 6 ordered by deadline are shown.

App #TitleExaminerDue in
18098542 POINT LOCATION DETECTION SYSTEMS AND METHODS FOR OBJECT IDENTIFICATION AND TARGETING HUNTSINGER, PETER K 15d overdue
19328924 SYSTEMS AND METHODS FOR ENHANCEMENT OF OBJECT IDENTIFICATION AND TARGETING BEASLEY, DEIRDRE L —
19248027 SYSTEMS AND METHODS FOR ENHANCEMENT OF OBJECT IDENTIFICATION AND TARGETING BEASLEY, DEIRDRE L —
19033411 HIGH INTENSITY ILLUMINATION SYSTEMS AND METHODS OF USE THEREOF HANSEN, JONATHAN M —
18893097 AUTONOMOUS LASER WEED ERADICATION DANG, PHILIP —
18438188 SYSTEMS AND METHODS FOR AUTONOMOUS CROP THINNING CHANG, VINCENT WEN-LIANG —

Top Art Units

Art UnitApps
2482 2
2877 1
2488 1
2119 1
2682 1

Pending Office Actions

App #TitleExaminerArt UnitStatutesStatusDue inAIFiled
19328924 SYSTEMS AND METHODS FOR ENHANCEMENT OF OBJECT IDENTIFICATION AND TARGETING BEASLEY, DEIRDRE L 2482 §103 Final Rejection — Pending Sep 15, 2025
19248027 SYSTEMS AND METHODS FOR ENHANCEMENT OF OBJECT IDENTIFICATION AND TARGETING BEASLEY, DEIRDRE L 2482 §102§103 Final Rejection — Pending Jun 24, 2025
19033411 HIGH INTENSITY ILLUMINATION SYSTEMS AND METHODS OF USE THEREOF HANSEN, JONATHAN M 2877 §102§103 Non-Final OA — Pending Jan 21, 2025
18893097 AUTONOMOUS LASER WEED ERADICATION DANG, PHILIP 2488 §103§112 Non-Final OA — Pending Sep 23, 2024
18438188 SYSTEMS AND METHODS FOR AUTONOMOUS CROP THINNING CHANG, VINCENT WEN-LIANG 2119 §103 Non-Final OA — Pending Feb 09, 2024
18098542 POINT LOCATION DETECTION SYSTEMS AND METHODS FOR OBJECT IDENTIFICATION AND TARGETING HUNTSINGER, PETER K 2682 §103 Final Rejection 15d overdue Pending Jan 18, 2023

Managing Carbon Autonomous Robotic Systems Inc.'s Patent Portfolio?

IP Author helps IP teams respond to office actions faster with AI-generated responses, examiner analytics, and prosecution intelligence.

Start Free Trial

Frequently Asked Questions

How many pending USPTO office actions does Carbon Autonomous Robotic Systems Inc. have?

Carbon Autonomous Robotic Systems Inc. has 6 pending office actions as of October 2026, spread across 5 art units and 5 examiners.

Which USPTO examiner handles the most Carbon Autonomous Robotic Systems Inc. applications?

Deirdre L Beasley has the most, with 2 of Carbon Autonomous Robotic Systems Inc.'s pending office actions.

What technology area are Carbon Autonomous Robotic Systems Inc.'s patent applications in?

Mostly Networking & Security (USPTO Tech Center 2400), based on where its pending office actions are examined.

Sign in with your work email

Enter your email to receive a magic link. No password needed.

Personal email addresses (Gmail, Yahoo, etc.) are not accepted.

Free tier: 3 strategy analyses per month