Prosecution Insights
Prosecution Insights
Technology area: Medical Devices & Mechanical Engineering
1 pending office actions • 1 art units • 1 examiners • 0 of 1 (0%) have an AI response strategy ready • 1 patents granted in the last 365 days
Cardiacbooster B V currently has 2 pending office actions in the Medical Devices & Mechanical Engineering technology area. These 2 matters are assigned to 2 distinct examiners and are located in 2 distinct art units. This indicates that each of the company's active filings is being reviewed by a different person in a different technical division of the patent office. Such a distribution suggests that the company's medical device innovations may involve distinct mechanical or clinical applications that require separate specialized reviews.
The busiest examiner for this portfolio is GHAND, JENNIFER LEIGH-STEWAR, who is managing 1 pending office action. With 2 pending office actions in total, the workload is perfectly balanced between the 2 distinct examiners. This 1 to 1 ratio of pending actions to examiners and art units ensures that no single administrative group or individual reviewer controls the company's entire prosecution pipeline. Practitioners should be prepared for different examiner styles across these 2 distinct art units as they manage the company's active matters.
Based on the USPTO statutory response window for each pending office action. 1 of the docket's apps have a known mailing date; the rest are excluded from the tile counts.
Difficulty is derived from the rejection statutes on the most recent pending office action. §101-driven and multi-statute cases are graded Hard; §112-only and obviousness-type double-patenting cases are graded Easy; everything else is Medium. "Unknown" means we have not yet parsed a statute for that office action.
| Bucket | Cases |
|---|---|
| §103 only | 1 (100%) |
How the docket's pending cases split across USPTO tech-center bands.
Manual office-action response work runs about 10 hours per case. The time-saved bands below show what IP Author's prosecution pipeline typically delivers — a conservative 20% on the low end, 35% in the middle, 50% on the high end.
| Examiner | Apps on this docket | Allow rate | Interview lift |
|---|---|---|---|
| WOZNICKI, JACQUELINE | 1 | 49.8% | +26.0% |
Cases in front of an examiner whose interview lift is 10 percentage points or more — i.e. interviewed cases historically resolve more favorably than non-interviewed ones. The top 1 ordered by deadline are shown.
| App # | Title | Examiner | Due in |
|---|---|---|---|
| 18061414 | METHODS FOR MANAGING BLOOD FLOW | WOZNICKI, JACQUELINE | 10d overdue |
| Art Unit | Apps |
|---|---|
| 3774 | 1 |
| App # | Title | Examiner | Art Unit | Statutes | Status | Due in | AI | Filed |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 18061414 | METHODS FOR MANAGING BLOOD FLOW | WOZNICKI, JACQUELINE | 3774 | §103 | Non-Final OA | 10d overdue | Pending | Dec 02, 2022 |
IP Author helps IP teams respond to office actions faster with AI-generated responses, examiner analytics, and prosecution intelligence.
Start Free Trial