Prosecution Insights
Prosecution Insights
Technology area: Transportation, E-Commerce & Mechanical Systems
1 pending office actions • 1 art units • 1 examiners • 0 of 1 (0%) have an AI response strategy ready
Care Constitution Corp. is active in the Transportation, E-Commerce & Mechanical Systems technology area with 1 pending office action. This action is handled by 1 distinct examiner and 1 distinct art unit. This reflects a targeted prosecution effort within a specialized technical field of the patent office, allowing for a direct and focused interaction between the applicant and the examiner.
GO, JOHN PHILIP is the busiest examiner for this portfolio, currently managing the 1 pending office action. With 1 distinct examiner and 1 distinct art unit involved, the prosecution process is highly focused. The applicant must address the specific technical requirements of this single examiner to advance the pending application. By concentrating on the 1 pending office action, the company can work toward a resolution within the 1 distinct art unit, ensuring that its innovation is reviewed according to the specific standards of the 1 distinct examiner assigned to the matter.
Based on the USPTO statutory response window for each pending office action. 1 of the docket's apps have a known mailing date; the rest are excluded from the tile counts.
Difficulty is derived from the rejection statutes on the most recent pending office action. §101-driven and multi-statute cases are graded Hard; §112-only and obviousness-type double-patenting cases are graded Easy; everything else is Medium. "Unknown" means we have not yet parsed a statute for that office action.
| Bucket | Cases |
|---|---|
| §101 + other | 1 (100%) |
How the docket's pending cases split across USPTO tech-center bands.
Manual office-action response work runs about 10 hours per case. The time-saved bands below show what IP Author's prosecution pipeline typically delivers — a conservative 20% on the low end, 35% in the middle, 50% on the high end.
| Examiner | Apps on this docket | Allow rate | Interview lift |
|---|---|---|---|
| GO, JOHN PHILIP | 1 | 34.1% | +43.1% |
Multi-statute / §101-driven matters, or cases in front of an examiner with an allow rate under 30%. The top 1 ordered by deadline are shown.
| App # | Title | Examiner | Due in |
|---|---|---|---|
| 18791292 | CYBER-PHYSICAL SYSTEM TO ENHANCE USABILITY AND QUALITY OF TELEHEALTH CONSULTATION | GO, JOHN PHILIP | 1d overdue |
Cases in front of an examiner whose interview lift is 10 percentage points or more — i.e. interviewed cases historically resolve more favorably than non-interviewed ones. The top 1 ordered by deadline are shown.
| App # | Title | Examiner | Due in |
|---|---|---|---|
| 18791292 | CYBER-PHYSICAL SYSTEM TO ENHANCE USABILITY AND QUALITY OF TELEHEALTH CONSULTATION | GO, JOHN PHILIP | 1d overdue |
| Art Unit | Apps |
|---|---|
| 3681 | 1 |
| App # | Title | Examiner | Art Unit | Statutes | Status | Due in | AI | Filed |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 18791292 | CYBER-PHYSICAL SYSTEM TO ENHANCE USABILITY AND QUALITY OF TELEHEALTH CONSULTATION | GO, JOHN PHILIP | 3681 | §101§103§112 | Final Rejection | 1d overdue | Pending | Jul 31, 2024 |
IP Author helps IP teams respond to office actions faster with AI-generated responses, examiner analytics, and prosecution intelligence.
Start Free Trial