3 pending office actions • 3 art units • 3 examiners • 0 of 3 (0%) have an AI response strategy ready • 1 patents granted in the last 365 days
Based on the USPTO statutory response window for each pending office action. 2 of the docket's apps have a known mailing date; the rest are excluded from the tile counts.
Difficulty is derived from the rejection statutes on the most recent pending office action. §101-driven and multi-statute cases are graded Hard; §112-only and obviousness-type double-patenting cases are graded Easy; everything else is Medium. "Unknown" means we have not yet parsed a statute for that office action.
| Bucket | Cases |
|---|---|
| §101 + other | 1 (33%) |
| §102 only | 1 (33%) |
| Multi-statute (no §101) | 1 (33%) |
How the docket's pending cases split across USPTO tech-center bands.
Manual office-action response work runs about 10 hours per case. The time-saved bands below show what IP Author's prosecution pipeline typically delivers — a conservative 20% on the low end, 35% in the middle, 50% on the high end.
| Examiner | Apps on this docket | Allow rate | Interview lift |
|---|---|---|---|
| YANCHUS III, PAUL B | 1 | 82.8% | +13.4% |
| TU, AURELIE H | 1 | 56.4% | +60.2% |
| WRUBLESKI, MATTHEW JAMES | 1 | 59.8% | +59.4% |
Cases in front of an examiner with an allow rate of 80%+ where the difficulty is Easy or Medium. The top 1 ordered by deadline are shown.
| App # | Title | Examiner | Due in |
|---|---|---|---|
| 18385860 | PERSONALIZED DEVICE BASEPLATE USING 3D SCANNING AND SUBSTRACTIVE MANUFACTURING | YANCHUS III, PAUL B | 21d |
Multi-statute / §101-driven matters, or cases in front of an examiner with an allow rate under 30%. The top 2 ordered by deadline are shown.
| App # | Title | Examiner | Due in |
|---|---|---|---|
| 18482398 | Suction Device With Improved Ejection Mechanism | WRUBLESKI, MATTHEW JAMES | 18d overdue |
| 18382333 | DEVICE FOR MEASURING RATE OF BODY FLUID FLOW THROUGH A TUBE | TU, AURELIE H | — |
Cases in front of an examiner whose interview lift is 10 percentage points or more — i.e. interviewed cases historically resolve more favorably than non-interviewed ones. The top 3 ordered by deadline are shown.
| App # | Title | Examiner | Due in |
|---|---|---|---|
| 18482398 | Suction Device With Improved Ejection Mechanism | WRUBLESKI, MATTHEW JAMES | 18d overdue |
| 18385860 | PERSONALIZED DEVICE BASEPLATE USING 3D SCANNING AND SUBSTRACTIVE MANUFACTURING | YANCHUS III, PAUL B | 21d |
| 18382333 | DEVICE FOR MEASURING RATE OF BODY FLUID FLOW THROUGH A TUBE | TU, AURELIE H | — |
| Art Unit | Apps |
|---|---|
| 2115 | 1 |
| 3791 | 1 |
| 3781 | 1 |
| App # | Title | Examiner | Art Unit | Statutes | Status | Due in | AI | Filed |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 18385860 | PERSONALIZED DEVICE BASEPLATE USING 3D SCANNING AND SUBSTRACTIVE MANUFACTURING | YANCHUS III, PAUL B | 2115 | §102 | Non-Final OA | 21d | Pending | Oct 31, 2023 |
| 18382333 | DEVICE FOR MEASURING RATE OF BODY FLUID FLOW THROUGH A TUBE | TU, AURELIE H | 3791 | §101§103§112 | Final Rejection | — | Pending | Oct 20, 2023 |
| 18482398 | Suction Device With Improved Ejection Mechanism | WRUBLESKI, MATTHEW JAMES | 3781 | §102§103 | Non-Final OA | 18d overdue | Pending | Oct 06, 2023 |
IP Author helps IP teams respond to office actions faster with AI-generated responses, examiner analytics, and prosecution intelligence.
Start Free Trial