Prosecution Insights
Prosecution Insights
2 pending office actions • 0 art units • 2 examiners • 0 of 2 (0%) have an AI response strategy ready • 2 patents granted in the last 365 days
Carl Geringhoff GmbH & Co. Kommanditgesellschaft has 2 pending office actions in its company patent portfolio. These actions are being handled by 2 distinct examiners, which means the matters are under separate review. TRAN, JULIA C is the busiest examiner for this portfolio, with 1 pending office action.
Since there are 2 distinct examiners for 2 pending office actions, the workload is split between them. This indicates that the company is currently managing multiple independent prosecution paths at the patent office. The presence of 2 pending office actions shows an active engagement with the examination process for Carl Geringhoff GmbH & Co. Kommanditgesellschaft.
With 2 distinct examiners involved, the company must address different sets of feedback for its applications. This data provides a snapshot of the current prosecution status. The 2 pending office actions represent unique opportunities for the company to secure its patent rights. The use of 2 distinct examiners suggests a distributed approach to its current filings. This data captures the company's current activity level, where 1 pending action is assigned to the busiest examiner.
Difficulty is derived from the rejection statutes on the most recent pending office action. §101-driven and multi-statute cases are graded Hard; §112-only and obviousness-type double-patenting cases are graded Easy; everything else is Medium. "Unknown" means we have not yet parsed a statute for that office action.
| Bucket | Cases |
|---|---|
| Multi-statute (no §101) | 2 (100%) |
How the docket's pending cases split across USPTO tech-center bands.
Manual office-action response work runs about 10 hours per case. The time-saved bands below show what IP Author's prosecution pipeline typically delivers — a conservative 20% on the low end, 35% in the middle, 50% on the high end.
| Examiner | Apps on this docket | Allow rate | Interview lift |
|---|---|---|---|
| TRAN, JULIA C | 1 | 62.5% | +31.9% |
| FABIAN-KOVACS, ARPAD | 1 | 84.9% | +3.1% |
Multi-statute / §101-driven matters, or cases in front of an examiner with an allow rate under 30%. The top 2 ordered by deadline are shown.
| App # | Title | Examiner | Due in |
|---|---|---|---|
| 18867116 | PICK-UP ATTACHMENT FOR A HARVESTING MACHINE | TRAN, JULIA C | — |
| 18855682 | PICK-UP ATTACHMENT FOR A HARVESTING MACHINE | FABIAN-KOVACS, ARPAD | — |
Cases in front of an examiner whose interview lift is 10 percentage points or more — i.e. interviewed cases historically resolve more favorably than non-interviewed ones. The top 1 ordered by deadline are shown.
| App # | Title | Examiner | Due in |
|---|---|---|---|
| 18867116 | PICK-UP ATTACHMENT FOR A HARVESTING MACHINE | TRAN, JULIA C | — |
| App # | Title | Examiner | Art Unit | Statutes | Status | Due in | AI | Filed |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 18867116 | PICK-UP ATTACHMENT FOR A HARVESTING MACHINE | TRAN, JULIA C | — | §102§103§112 | Non-Final OA | — | Pending | Nov 19, 2024 |
| 18855682 | PICK-UP ATTACHMENT FOR A HARVESTING MACHINE | FABIAN-KOVACS, ARPAD | — | §102§103§112 | Non-Final OA | — | Pending | Oct 10, 2024 |
IP Author helps IP teams respond to office actions faster with AI-generated responses, examiner analytics, and prosecution intelligence.
Start Free Trial