Prosecution Insights
Prosecution Insights
Technology area: Transportation, E-Commerce & Mechanical Systems
1 pending office actions • 1 art units • 1 examiners • 0 of 1 (0%) have an AI response strategy ready
The patent portfolio for Carla Nohemi Delgado currently shows 1 pending office action within the Transportation, E-Commerce & Mechanical Systems technology area. This single action is assigned to 1 distinct examiner working within 1 distinct art unit. The concentration of the portfolio suggests a highly specific focus for the current prosecution cycle, as there are no other active matters across different units.
LABARGE, ALISON N is identified as the busiest examiner for this portfolio, managing 1 busiest examiner pending action. This represents the entirety of the pending workload for the entity. Practitioners can observe that the workload is not distributed across multiple individuals or units at this stage, which simplifies the communication process between the applicant and the patent office.
The presence of 1 distinct art unit indicates that the legal strategy is currently contained within a specialized group at the patent office. Because there is only 1 pending office action, the interaction between the applicant and the examiner LABARGE, ALISON N will determine the immediate trajectory of the portfolio. This singular focus allows for a dedicated approach to resolving the 1 pending office action without the complexity of managing multiple examiners or varied art unit requirements.
Difficulty is derived from the rejection statutes on the most recent pending office action. §101-driven and multi-statute cases are graded Hard; §112-only and obviousness-type double-patenting cases are graded Easy; everything else is Medium. "Unknown" means we have not yet parsed a statute for that office action.
| Bucket | Cases |
|---|---|
| §103 only | 1 (100%) |
How the docket's pending cases split across USPTO tech-center bands.
Manual office-action response work runs about 10 hours per case. The time-saved bands below show what IP Author's prosecution pipeline typically delivers — a conservative 20% on the low end, 35% in the middle, 50% on the high end.
| Examiner | Apps on this docket | Allow rate | Interview lift |
|---|---|---|---|
| LABARGE, ALISON N | 1 | 62.8% | +34.5% |
Cases in front of an examiner whose interview lift is 10 percentage points or more — i.e. interviewed cases historically resolve more favorably than non-interviewed ones. The top 1 ordered by deadline are shown.
| App # | Title | Examiner | Due in |
|---|---|---|---|
| 19021463 | THERAPEUTIC TABLE FOR POST-SURGERY PATIENTS | LABARGE, ALISON N | — |
| Art Unit | Apps |
|---|---|
| 3679 | 1 |
| App # | Title | Examiner | Art Unit | Statutes | Status | Due in | AI | Filed |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 19021463 | THERAPEUTIC TABLE FOR POST-SURGERY PATIENTS | LABARGE, ALISON N | 3679 | §103 | Final Rejection | — | Pending | Jan 15, 2025 |
IP Author helps IP teams respond to office actions faster with AI-generated responses, examiner analytics, and prosecution intelligence.
Start Free Trial