Prosecution Insights
Prosecution Insights
Technology area: Transportation, E-Commerce & Mechanical Systems
1 pending office actions • 1 art units • 1 examiners • 0 of 1 (0%) have an AI response strategy ready
Carol Young Corporation has 1 pending office action within the Transportation, E-Commerce & Mechanical Systems technology area. This single matter is assigned to 1 distinct examiner, KWIECINSKI, RYAN D. The prosecution occurs within 1 distinct art unit. KWIECINSKI, RYAN D is the busiest examiner for the company, managing 1 pending office action. This 1 pending office action represents the total current workload. The company's patent efforts are currently focused on this single application.
The company's focus on Transportation, E-Commerce & Mechanical Systems is currently channeled through 1 pending office action. This case is being reviewed by 1 distinct examiner, KWIECINSKI, RYAN D, in 1 distinct art unit. With only 1 pending office action active, the company can focus its resources on this specific prosecution. Practitioners should monitor the single art unit closely to ensure the 1 pending office action proceeds efficiently toward allowance and eventual grant of the patent rights.
Based on the USPTO statutory response window for each pending office action. 1 of the docket's apps have a known mailing date; the rest are excluded from the tile counts.
Difficulty is derived from the rejection statutes on the most recent pending office action. §101-driven and multi-statute cases are graded Hard; §112-only and obviousness-type double-patenting cases are graded Easy; everything else is Medium. "Unknown" means we have not yet parsed a statute for that office action.
| Bucket | Cases |
|---|---|
| §112 only | 1 (100%) |
How the docket's pending cases split across USPTO tech-center bands.
Manual office-action response work runs about 10 hours per case. The time-saved bands below show what IP Author's prosecution pipeline typically delivers — a conservative 20% on the low end, 35% in the middle, 50% on the high end.
| Examiner | Apps on this docket | Allow rate | Interview lift |
|---|---|---|---|
| KWIECINSKI, RYAN D | 1 | 68.2% | +19.7% |
Cases in front of an examiner whose interview lift is 10 percentage points or more — i.e. interviewed cases historically resolve more favorably than non-interviewed ones. The top 1 ordered by deadline are shown.
| App # | Title | Examiner | Due in |
|---|---|---|---|
| 18812347 | Non-Interlock Assembled Flooring System | KWIECINSKI, RYAN D | 28d |
| Art Unit | Apps |
|---|---|
| 3635 | 1 |
| App # | Title | Examiner | Art Unit | Statutes | Status | Due in | AI | Filed |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 18812347 | Non-Interlock Assembled Flooring System | KWIECINSKI, RYAN D | 3635 | §112 | Final Rejection | 28d | Pending | Aug 22, 2024 |
IP Author helps IP teams respond to office actions faster with AI-generated responses, examiner analytics, and prosecution intelligence.
Start Free Trial