Technology area: Transportation, E-Commerce & Mechanical Systems
2 pending office actions • 1 art units • 2 examiners • 0 of 2 (0%) have an AI response strategy ready • 2 patents granted in the last 365 days
Carota Technology Corporation is active in the Transportation, E-Commerce & Mechanical Systems technology area. The company currently manages 2 pending office actions. These actions are concentrated within 1 distinct art unit, suggesting a consistent administrative environment for the company's current patent applications.
Despite the 1 distinct art unit, the workload is split between 2 distinct examiners. HALL, HANA VICTORIA is identified as the busiest examiner, with 1 pending office action under their review. This distribution means that each of the 2 pending office actions is being evaluated by a different individual, providing 2 separate channels of feedback within the same technology area.
Practitioners should recognize that while the 1 distinct art unit provides a stable procedural baseline, the 2 distinct examiners may have different substantive approaches. Because HALL, HANA VICTORIA handles 1 pending office action, the company must manage 2 parallel prosecution tracks. Navigating the Transportation, E-Commerce & Mechanical Systems field for Carota Technology Corporation requires addressing the specific requirements of both examiners to resolve the 2 pending office actions.
Based on the USPTO statutory response window for each pending office action. 1 of the docket's apps have a known mailing date; the rest are excluded from the tile counts.
Difficulty is derived from the rejection statutes on the most recent pending office action. §101-driven and multi-statute cases are graded Hard; §112-only and obviousness-type double-patenting cases are graded Easy; everything else is Medium. "Unknown" means we have not yet parsed a statute for that office action.
| Bucket | Cases |
|---|---|
| §101 only | 2 (100%) |
How the docket's pending cases split across USPTO tech-center bands.
Manual office-action response work runs about 10 hours per case. The time-saved bands below show what IP Author's prosecution pipeline typically delivers — a conservative 20% on the low end, 35% in the middle, 50% on the high end.
| Examiner | Apps on this docket | Allow rate | Interview lift |
|---|---|---|---|
| HALL, HANA VICTORIA | 1 | 71.4% | +66.7% |
| TESTARDI, DAVID A | 1 | 74.2% | +22.0% |
Multi-statute / §101-driven matters, or cases in front of an examiner with an allow rate under 30%. The top 2 ordered by deadline are shown.
| App # | Title | Examiner | Due in |
|---|---|---|---|
| 18947672 | METHODS AND SYSTEMS FOR DIAGNOSING VEHICLE FAULTS BASED ON ENVIRONMENT-ADAPTIVE BAYESIAN NETWORK | HALL, HANA VICTORIA | 20d |
| 18934143 | METHOD AND SYSTEM FOR GENERATING REPAIR RECOMMENDATIONS FOR VEHICLES | TESTARDI, DAVID A | — |
Cases in front of an examiner whose interview lift is 10 percentage points or more — i.e. interviewed cases historically resolve more favorably than non-interviewed ones. The top 2 ordered by deadline are shown.
| App # | Title | Examiner | Due in |
|---|---|---|---|
| 18947672 | METHODS AND SYSTEMS FOR DIAGNOSING VEHICLE FAULTS BASED ON ENVIRONMENT-ADAPTIVE BAYESIAN NETWORK | HALL, HANA VICTORIA | 20d |
| 18934143 | METHOD AND SYSTEM FOR GENERATING REPAIR RECOMMENDATIONS FOR VEHICLES | TESTARDI, DAVID A | — |
| Art Unit | Apps |
|---|---|
| 3664 | 2 |
| App # | Title | Examiner | Art Unit | Statutes | Status | Due in | AI | Filed |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 18947672 | METHODS AND SYSTEMS FOR DIAGNOSING VEHICLE FAULTS BASED ON ENVIRONMENT-ADAPTIVE BAYESIAN NETWORK | HALL, HANA VICTORIA | 3664 | §101 | Final Rejection | 20d | Pending | Nov 14, 2024 |
| 18934143 | METHOD AND SYSTEM FOR GENERATING REPAIR RECOMMENDATIONS FOR VEHICLES | TESTARDI, DAVID A | 3664 | §101 | Final Rejection | — | Pending | Oct 31, 2024 |
IP Author helps IP teams respond to office actions faster with AI-generated responses, examiner analytics, and prosecution intelligence.
Start Free Trial