Prosecution Insights
Prosecution Insights
Technology area: Transportation, E-Commerce & Mechanical Systems
1 pending office actions • 1 art units • 1 examiners • 0 of 1 (0%) have an AI response strategy ready
Cathvision Aps maintains 1 pending office action within the Transportation, E-Commerce & Mechanical Systems technology area. This specific matter is handled by 1 distinct examiner, BORISSOV, IGOR N, who is also designated as the busiest examiner for the portfolio. The prosecution is localized within a distinct art unit, reflecting the current contact point for the company's patent filings. Practitioners can expect a specific examination experience as long as the portfolio remains within this art unit and examiner pairing.
Because BORISSOV, IGOR N is responsible for the assigned workload, the entirety of the company's active prosecution is handled by this individual. This alignment between the pending office action and the art unit indicates the current prosecution footprint. The fact that there is a distinct examiner across a distinct art unit for the pending matter in Transportation, E-Commerce & Mechanical Systems means that the company has an individual point of interaction. Strategy should be tailored to the historical patterns of this examiner and art unit.
Based on the USPTO statutory response window for each pending office action. 1 of the docket's apps have a known mailing date; the rest are excluded from the tile counts.
Difficulty is derived from the rejection statutes on the most recent pending office action. §101-driven and multi-statute cases are graded Hard; §112-only and obviousness-type double-patenting cases are graded Easy; everything else is Medium. "Unknown" means we have not yet parsed a statute for that office action.
| Bucket | Cases |
|---|---|
| §101 only | 1 (100%) |
How the docket's pending cases split across USPTO tech-center bands.
Manual office-action response work runs about 10 hours per case. The time-saved bands below show what IP Author's prosecution pipeline typically delivers — a conservative 20% on the low end, 35% in the middle, 50% on the high end.
| Examiner | Apps on this docket | Allow rate | Interview lift |
|---|---|---|---|
| BORISSOV, IGOR N | 1 | 28.5% | +41.8% |
Multi-statute / §101-driven matters, or cases in front of an examiner with an allow rate under 30%. The top 1 ordered by deadline are shown.
| App # | Title | Examiner | Due in |
|---|---|---|---|
| 18680721 | METHOD FOR ANALYZING AN ELECTROGRAM | BORISSOV, IGOR N | 19d overdue |
Cases in front of an examiner whose interview lift is 10 percentage points or more — i.e. interviewed cases historically resolve more favorably than non-interviewed ones. The top 1 ordered by deadline are shown.
| App # | Title | Examiner | Due in |
|---|---|---|---|
| 18680721 | METHOD FOR ANALYZING AN ELECTROGRAM | BORISSOV, IGOR N | 19d overdue |
| Art Unit | Apps |
|---|---|
| 3685 | 1 |
| App # | Title | Examiner | Art Unit | Statutes | Status | Due in | AI | Filed |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 18680721 | METHOD FOR ANALYZING AN ELECTROGRAM | BORISSOV, IGOR N | 3685 | §101 | Final Rejection | 19d overdue | Pending | May 31, 2024 |
IP Author helps IP teams respond to office actions faster with AI-generated responses, examiner analytics, and prosecution intelligence.
Start Free Trial