Prosecution Insights
Last updated: October 25, 2026

Cathworks Ltd.

Technology area: Communications

3 pending office actions • 3 art units • 3 examiners • 0 of 3 (0%) have an AI response strategy ready • 4 patents granted in the last 365 days

Analysis

Cathworks Ltd. has 3 pending office actions in the Communications technology area. These actions are split among 3 distinct examiners and 3 distinct art units. There is no overlap in the personnel or the specialized units reviewing these applications. With 3 pending office actions and 3 distinct examiners, the company must manage three separate prosecution tracks. The involvement of 3 distinct art units suggests that the communications technology being patented is diverse enough to span multiple USPTO classifications.

RUDOLPH, VINCENT M is the busiest examiner, currently handling 1 pending action. Because each of the 3 pending office actions is being reviewed by a different 1 of the 3 distinct examiners, there is no opportunity for a centralized negotiation strategy. The 3 distinct art units further isolate each case, as each examiner likely follows the specific guidelines of their own specialized group. Practitioners should treat each of the 3 pending office actions as an independent effort, as the lack of examiner or art unit overlap prevents the application of a unified prosecution approach across the current portfolio.

Written from this page's own data; every figure is computed from USPTO records and verified before publication.

Portfolio Summary

3
Total Pending OAs
3
Non-Final OAs
0
Final Rejections
0
Advisory / Quayle

Case Difficulty Mix

Difficulty is derived from the rejection statutes on the most recent pending office action. §101-driven and multi-statute cases are graded Hard; §112-only and obviousness-type double-patenting cases are graded Easy; everything else is Medium. "Unknown" means we have not yet parsed a statute for that office action.

1
Hard (33%)
1
Medium (33%)
1
Easy (33%)
0
Unknown (0%)

Rejection Statute Mix

BucketCases
§102 only1 (33%)
§112 only1 (33%)
Multi-statute (no §101)1 (33%)

Industry Mix

How the docket's pending cases split across USPTO tech-center bands.

0
Life Sciences
0% of docket
0
Information Tech
0% of docket
3
Communications
100% of docket
0
Semiconductors
0% of docket
0
Mechanical / Eng
0% of docket
0
Business / Other
0% of docket

Time-on-OA Estimate

Manual office-action response work runs about 10 hours per case. The time-saved bands below show what IP Author's prosecution pipeline typically delivers — a conservative 20% on the low end, 35% in the middle, 50% on the high end.

30 h
Manual time on pending OAs
6 h
Time saved (low, 20%)
10 h
Time saved (mid, 35%)
0.3 wks
FTE-weeks freed (mid)

Top Examiners on this docket

ExaminerApps on this docketAllow rateInterview lift
RUDOLPH, VINCENT M 1 47.2% +41.2%
ANSARI, TAHMINA N 1 85.4% +18.5%
CHAN, CAROL WANG 1 84.2% +33.6%

Quick Wins (1)

Cases in front of an examiner with an allow rate of 80%+ where the difficulty is Easy or Medium. The top 1 ordered by deadline are shown.

App #TitleExaminerDue in
19030247 VASCULAR CHARACTERISTIC DETERMINATION WITH CORRESPONDENCE MODELING OF A VASCULAR TREE ANSARI, TAHMINA N —

Hard Cases (1)

Multi-statute / §101-driven matters, or cases in front of an examiner with an allow rate under 30%. The top 1 ordered by deadline are shown.

App #TitleExaminerDue in
18941745 SYSTEM FOR VASCULAR ASSESSMENT CHAN, CAROL WANG —

Interview Candidates (3)

Cases in front of an examiner whose interview lift is 10 percentage points or more — i.e. interviewed cases historically resolve more favorably than non-interviewed ones. The top 3 ordered by deadline are shown.

App #TitleExaminerDue in
19258684 CREATING A VASCULAR TREE MODEL RUDOLPH, VINCENT M —
19030247 VASCULAR CHARACTERISTIC DETERMINATION WITH CORRESPONDENCE MODELING OF A VASCULAR TREE ANSARI, TAHMINA N —
18941745 SYSTEM FOR VASCULAR ASSESSMENT CHAN, CAROL WANG —

Top Art Units

Art UnitApps
2673 1
2674 1
2672 1

Pending Office Actions

App #TitleExaminerArt UnitStatutesStatusDue inAIFiled
19258684 CREATING A VASCULAR TREE MODEL RUDOLPH, VINCENT M 2673 §112 Non-Final OA — Pending Jul 02, 2025
19030247 VASCULAR CHARACTERISTIC DETERMINATION WITH CORRESPONDENCE MODELING OF A VASCULAR TREE ANSARI, TAHMINA N 2674 §102Other Non-Final OA — Pending Jan 17, 2025
18941745 SYSTEM FOR VASCULAR ASSESSMENT CHAN, CAROL WANG 2672 §102§103§112 Non-Final OA — Pending Nov 08, 2024

Managing Cathworks Ltd.'s Patent Portfolio?

IP Author helps IP teams respond to office actions faster with AI-generated responses, examiner analytics, and prosecution intelligence.

Start Free Trial

Frequently Asked Questions

How many pending USPTO office actions does Cathworks Ltd. have?

Cathworks Ltd. has 3 pending office actions as of October 2026, spread across 3 art units and 3 examiners.

Which USPTO examiner handles the most Cathworks Ltd. applications?

Vincent M Rudolph has the most, with 1 of Cathworks Ltd.'s pending office actions.

What technology area are Cathworks Ltd.'s patent applications in?

Mostly Communications (USPTO Tech Center 2600), based on where its pending office actions are examined.

Sign in with your work email

Enter your email to receive a magic link. No password needed.

Personal email addresses (Gmail, Yahoo, etc.) are not accepted.

Free tier: 3 strategy analyses per month