Prosecution Insights
Last updated: May 29, 2026

Cavendish Capital LLC

3 pending office actions • 3 art units • 3 examiners • 0 of 3 (0%) have an AI response strategy ready • 1 patents granted in the last 365 days

Portfolio Summary

3
Total Pending OAs
2
Non-Final OAs
1
Final Rejections
0
Advisory / Quayle

Response Deadline Pressure

Based on the USPTO statutory response window for each pending office action. 3 of the docket's apps have a known mailing date; the rest are excluded from the tile counts.

1
Overdue
0
Due this week
1
Due this month
1
Due in next 60 days
0
Due later

Deadline Fire Line

Every pending office action with a known statutory deadline, placed on a days-until-due axis. Dots left of Today are overdue; the further right, the more runway. Cases that share a deadline window stack vertically. 3 of the docket's apps have a known mailing date.

-30dToday30d60d90d120d
Overdue (1)Due ≤ 30 days (1)Due ≤ 60 days (1)

Case Difficulty Mix

Difficulty is derived from the rejection statutes on the most recent pending office action. §101-driven and multi-statute cases are graded Hard; §112-only and obviousness-type double-patenting cases are graded Easy; everything else is Medium. "Unknown" means we have not yet parsed a statute for that office action.

0
Hard (0%)
3
Medium (100%)
0
Easy (0%)
0
Unknown (0%)

Rejection Statute Mix

BucketCases
§103 only3 (100%)

Industry Mix

How the docket's pending cases split across USPTO tech-center bands.

0
Life Sciences
0% of docket
0
Information Tech
0% of docket
3
Communications
100% of docket
0
Semiconductors
0% of docket
0
Mechanical / Eng
0% of docket
0
Business / Other
0% of docket

Time-on-OA Estimate

Manual office-action response work runs about 10 hours per case. The time-saved bands below show what IP Author's prosecution pipeline typically delivers — a conservative 20% on the low end, 35% in the middle, 50% on the high end.

30 h
Manual time on pending OAs
6 h
Time saved (low, 20%)
10 h
Time saved (mid, 35%)
0.3 wks
FTE-weeks freed (mid)

Top Examiners on this docket

ExaminerApps on this docketAllow rateInterview lift
NGUYEN, PHUNG HOANG JOSEPH 1 79.1% +31.6%
SALVUCCI, MATTHEW D 1 71.9% +28.3%
PATEL, SHIVANG I 1 74.6% +17.4%

Interview Candidates (3)

Cases in front of an examiner whose interview lift is 10 percentage points or more — i.e. interviewed cases historically resolve more favorably than non-interviewed ones. The top 3 ordered by deadline are shown.

App #TitleExaminerDue in
18056252 GENERATING AN AVATAR HAVING EXPRESSIONS THAT MIMICS EXPRESSIONS OF A PERSON SALVUCCI, MATTHEW D 10d overdue
17653034 MOVING A DIRECTION OF GAZE OF AN AVATAR PATEL, SHIVANG I 9d
18354608 GENERATING A SOUND REPRESENTATION OF A VIRTUAL ENVIRONMENT FROM MULTIPLE SOUND SOURCES NGUYEN, PHUNG HOANG JOSEPH 60d

Top Art Units

Art UnitApps
2691 1
2613 1
2615 1

Pending Office Actions

App #TitleExaminerArt UnitStatutesStatusDue inAIFiled
18354608 GENERATING A SOUND REPRESENTATION OF A VIRTUAL ENVIRONMENT FROM MULTIPLE SOUND SOURCES NGUYEN, PHUNG HOANG JOSEPH 2691 §103 Final Rejection 60d Pending Jul 18, 2023
18056252 GENERATING AN AVATAR HAVING EXPRESSIONS THAT MIMICS EXPRESSIONS OF A PERSON SALVUCCI, MATTHEW D 2613 §103 Non-Final OA 10d overdue Pending Nov 16, 2022
17653034 MOVING A DIRECTION OF GAZE OF AN AVATAR PATEL, SHIVANG I 2615 §103 Non-Final OA 9d Pending Mar 01, 2022

Managing Cavendish Capital LLC's Patent Portfolio?

IP Author helps IP teams respond to office actions faster with AI-generated responses, examiner analytics, and prosecution intelligence.

Start Free Trial

Sign in with your work email

Enter your email to receive a magic link. No password needed.

Personal email addresses (Gmail, Yahoo, etc.) are not accepted.

Free tier: 3 strategy analyses per month