Prosecution Insights
Prosecution Insights
2 pending office actions • 0 art units • 2 examiners • 0 of 2 (0%) have an AI response strategy ready
Cavendish Nuclear Limited currently manages 2 pending office actions. These actions are assigned to 2 distinct examiners, meaning each examiner is responsible for one of the pending matters. The data shows 0 distinct art units for these actions, which suggests a specific administrative categorization. With 2 distinct examiners involved, the company's current prosecution is split between two different individuals at the USPTO.
The busiest examiner for this portfolio is HA, NGUYEN Q, who holds 1 busiest examiner pending office action. Since there are 2 pending office actions in total, HA, NGUYEN Q manages 1 of the current pending matters. The other action is handled by the second of the 2 distinct examiners. For a practitioner, this distribution means that the 2 pending office actions are being reviewed independently by two different people. The lack of a specified technology area or art unit places the focus of prosecution strategy on the individual examiners.
Difficulty is derived from the rejection statutes on the most recent pending office action. §101-driven and multi-statute cases are graded Hard; §112-only and obviousness-type double-patenting cases are graded Easy; everything else is Medium. "Unknown" means we have not yet parsed a statute for that office action.
| Bucket | Cases |
|---|---|
| §102 only | 1 (50%) |
| Multi-statute (no §101) | 1 (50%) |
How the docket's pending cases split across USPTO tech-center bands.
Manual office-action response work runs about 10 hours per case. The time-saved bands below show what IP Author's prosecution pipeline typically delivers — a conservative 20% on the low end, 35% in the middle, 50% on the high end.
| Examiner | Apps on this docket | Allow rate | Interview lift |
|---|---|---|---|
| SINGER, DAVID L | 1 | 69.1% | +42.2% |
| HA, NGUYEN Q | 1 | 80.4% | +4.1% |
Cases in front of an examiner with an allow rate of 80%+ where the difficulty is Easy or Medium. The top 1 ordered by deadline are shown.
| App # | Title | Examiner | Due in |
|---|---|---|---|
| 18721653 | IMPROVEMENTS IN AND RELATING TO ULTRASOUND PROBES | HA, NGUYEN Q | — |
Multi-statute / §101-driven matters, or cases in front of an examiner with an allow rate under 30%. The top 1 ordered by deadline are shown.
| App # | Title | Examiner | Due in |
|---|---|---|---|
| 18721657 | IMPROVEMENTS IN AND RELATING TO ULTRASOUND PROBES | SINGER, DAVID L | — |
Cases in front of an examiner whose interview lift is 10 percentage points or more — i.e. interviewed cases historically resolve more favorably than non-interviewed ones. The top 1 ordered by deadline are shown.
| App # | Title | Examiner | Due in |
|---|---|---|---|
| 18721657 | IMPROVEMENTS IN AND RELATING TO ULTRASOUND PROBES | SINGER, DAVID L | — |
| App # | Title | Examiner | Art Unit | Statutes | Status | Due in | AI | Filed |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 18721657 | IMPROVEMENTS IN AND RELATING TO ULTRASOUND PROBES | SINGER, DAVID L | — | §102§103§112 | Non-Final OA | — | Pending | Jun 18, 2024 |
| 18721653 | IMPROVEMENTS IN AND RELATING TO ULTRASOUND PROBES | HA, NGUYEN Q | — | §102 | Non-Final OA | — | Pending | Jun 18, 2024 |
IP Author helps IP teams respond to office actions faster with AI-generated responses, examiner analytics, and prosecution intelligence.
Start Free Trial