Prosecution Insights
Last updated: October 02, 2026

Cedar Creek Future Pty Ltd. AS Trustee For Cedar Creek Trust

Technology area: Medical Devices & Mechanical Engineering

1 pending office actions • 1 art units • 1 examiners • 0 of 1 (0%) have an AI response strategy ready

Analysis

Cedar Creek Future Pty Ltd. AS Trustee For Cedar Creek Trust is active in the Medical Devices & Mechanical Engineering technology area. The company currently has 1 pending office action under review. This prosecution is being handled by 1 distinct examiner and is situated within 1 distinct art unit, indicating a very specific and concentrated focus for the company's current patent efforts.

The busiest examiner for the portfolio is DANDRIDGE, CHRISTOPHER R., who is responsible for the 1 pending office action. As this is the only pending office action for the company, the examiner's findings will be the primary factor in the company's current patenting success. The entire active portfolio is currently dependent on the resolution of this single matter.

The presence of 1 distinct art unit simplifies the prosecution landscape for practitioners. There is no need to manage the varying standards of multiple art units or the different styles of multiple examiners. With 1 distinct examiner and 1 pending office action, the company's current interaction with the patent office is highly focused within the Medical Devices & Mechanical Engineering domain.

Written from this page's own data; every figure is computed from USPTO records and verified before publication.

Portfolio Summary

1
Total Pending OAs
1
Non-Final OAs
0
Final Rejections
0
Advisory / Quayle

Case Difficulty Mix

Difficulty is derived from the rejection statutes on the most recent pending office action. §101-driven and multi-statute cases are graded Hard; §112-only and obviousness-type double-patenting cases are graded Easy; everything else is Medium. "Unknown" means we have not yet parsed a statute for that office action.

0
Hard (0%)
0
Medium (0%)
1
Easy (100%)
0
Unknown (0%)

Rejection Statute Mix

BucketCases
§112 only1 (100%)

Industry Mix

How the docket's pending cases split across USPTO tech-center bands.

0
Life Sciences
0% of docket
0
Information Tech
0% of docket
0
Communications
0% of docket
0
Semiconductors
0% of docket
1
Mechanical / Eng
100% of docket
0
Business / Other
0% of docket

Time-on-OA Estimate

Manual office-action response work runs about 10 hours per case. The time-saved bands below show what IP Author's prosecution pipeline typically delivers — a conservative 20% on the low end, 35% in the middle, 50% on the high end.

10 h
Manual time on pending OAs
2 h
Time saved (low, 20%)
4 h
Time saved (mid, 35%)
0.1 wks
FTE-weeks freed (mid)

Top Examiners on this docket

ExaminerApps on this docketAllow rateInterview lift
DANDRIDGE, CHRISTOPHER R. 1 65.9% +35.4%

Interview Candidates (1)

Cases in front of an examiner whose interview lift is 10 percentage points or more — i.e. interviewed cases historically resolve more favorably than non-interviewed ones. The top 1 ordered by deadline are shown.

App #TitleExaminerDue in
18014245 WEARABLE PERSONAL PROTECTION DEVICE DANDRIDGE, CHRISTOPHER R. —

Top Art Units

Art UnitApps
3752 1

Pending Office Actions

App #TitleExaminerArt UnitStatutesStatusDue inAIFiled
18014245 WEARABLE PERSONAL PROTECTION DEVICE DANDRIDGE, CHRISTOPHER R. 3752 §112 Non-Final OA — Pending Jan 03, 2023

Managing Cedar Creek Future Pty Ltd. AS Trustee For Cedar Creek Trust's Patent Portfolio?

IP Author helps IP teams respond to office actions faster with AI-generated responses, examiner analytics, and prosecution intelligence.

Start Free Trial

Sign in with your work email

Enter your email to receive a magic link. No password needed.

Personal email addresses (Gmail, Yahoo, etc.) are not accepted.

Free tier: 3 strategy analyses per month