Prosecution Insights
Prosecution Insights
Technology area: Transportation, E-Commerce & Mechanical Systems
1 pending office actions • 1 art units • 1 examiners • 0 of 1 (0%) have an AI response strategy ready
Celeritas Technology Holdings LLC is currently managing 1 pending office action in the Transportation, E-Commerce & Mechanical Systems technology area. This action is assigned to 1 distinct examiner within 1 distinct art unit. This concentrated activity suggests a very specific technical focus for the company's current patent prosecution. Because the portfolio involves only a single examiner and a single art unit, the outcome of the current prosecution is tied to the specific examination standards of this individual and unit. This streamlined profile allows for a very targeted legal strategy, focusing all resources on the requirements of the assigned examiner.
The busiest examiner, KANG, IRENE S, is responsible for the 1 pending office action. This represents the entirety of the company's current activity in the Transportation, E-Commerce & Mechanical Systems sector. Practitioners should focus their efforts on the specific requirements of the distinct examiner. The 1 distinct art unit involved will also dictate the technical precedents and prior art that are most relevant to the case. Understanding the specific tendencies of the busiest examiner is essential for navigating this focused prosecution landscape. The outcome of this interaction will define the current success rate for the portfolio.
Based on the USPTO statutory response window for each pending office action. 1 of the docket's apps have a known mailing date; the rest are excluded from the tile counts.
Difficulty is derived from the rejection statutes on the most recent pending office action. §101-driven and multi-statute cases are graded Hard; §112-only and obviousness-type double-patenting cases are graded Easy; everything else is Medium. "Unknown" means we have not yet parsed a statute for that office action.
| Bucket | Cases |
|---|---|
| §101 + other | 1 (100%) |
How the docket's pending cases split across USPTO tech-center bands.
Manual office-action response work runs about 10 hours per case. The time-saved bands below show what IP Author's prosecution pipeline typically delivers — a conservative 20% on the low end, 35% in the middle, 50% on the high end.
| Examiner | Apps on this docket | Allow rate | Interview lift |
|---|---|---|---|
| KANG, IRENE S | 1 | 16.4% | +26.2% |
Multi-statute / §101-driven matters, or cases in front of an examiner with an allow rate under 30%. The top 1 ordered by deadline are shown.
| App # | Title | Examiner | Due in |
|---|---|---|---|
| 18893875 | SYSTEMS AND METHODS OF OPTIMIZING RETIREMENT PLANS | KANG, IRENE S | 45d overdue |
Cases in front of an examiner whose interview lift is 10 percentage points or more — i.e. interviewed cases historically resolve more favorably than non-interviewed ones. The top 1 ordered by deadline are shown.
| App # | Title | Examiner | Due in |
|---|---|---|---|
| 18893875 | SYSTEMS AND METHODS OF OPTIMIZING RETIREMENT PLANS | KANG, IRENE S | 45d overdue |
| Art Unit | Apps |
|---|---|
| 3696 | 1 |
| App # | Title | Examiner | Art Unit | Statutes | Status | Due in | AI | Filed |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 18893875 | SYSTEMS AND METHODS OF OPTIMIZING RETIREMENT PLANS | KANG, IRENE S | 3696 | §101§103 | Final Rejection | 45d overdue | Pending | Sep 23, 2024 |
IP Author helps IP teams respond to office actions faster with AI-generated responses, examiner analytics, and prosecution intelligence.
Start Free Trial