Prosecution Insights
Last updated: October 25, 2026

Cellectis

Technology area: Biotechnology & Pharmaceuticals

5 pending office actions • 3 art units • 5 examiners • 0 of 5 (0%) have an AI response strategy ready • 4 patents granted in the last 365 days

Analysis

Cellectis currently manages a patent portfolio containing 6 pending office actions within the Biotechnology & Pharmaceuticals technology area. These pending matters are distributed across 6 distinct examiners, which indicates that each individual action is being reviewed by a different examiner at the patent office. This direct ratio between pending actions and examiners suggests a diverse range of technical subject matter that requires specialized review from multiple points of contact.

The prosecution activity for Cellectis spans 4 distinct art units, showing a concentration of technical focus despite the variety of examiners involved. KIM, TAEYOON is identified as the busiest examiner for the portfolio, currently responsible for 1 pending office action. Because the busiest examiner's load of 1 matches the load of every other examiner in the portfolio, the 6 pending office actions are distributed across the 6 distinct examiners. This decentralized prosecution environment across 4 distinct art units requires the company to manage multiple examiner relationships simultaneously.

Written from this page's own data; every figure is computed from USPTO records and verified before publication.

Portfolio Summary

5
Total Pending OAs
4
Non-Final OAs
1
Final Rejections
0
Advisory / Quayle

Response Deadline Pressure

Based on the USPTO statutory response window for each pending office action. 1 of the docket's apps have a known mailing date; the rest are excluded from the tile counts.

1
Overdue
0
Due this week
0
Due this month
0
Due in next 60 days
0
Due later

Case Difficulty Mix

Difficulty is derived from the rejection statutes on the most recent pending office action. §101-driven and multi-statute cases are graded Hard; §112-only and obviousness-type double-patenting cases are graded Easy; everything else is Medium. "Unknown" means we have not yet parsed a statute for that office action.

1
Hard (20%)
4
Medium (80%)
0
Easy (0%)
0
Unknown (0%)

Rejection Statute Mix

BucketCases
Double-patenting + other4 (80%)
Multi-statute (no §101)1 (20%)

Industry Mix

How the docket's pending cases split across USPTO tech-center bands.

5
Life Sciences
100% of docket
0
Information Tech
0% of docket
0
Communications
0% of docket
0
Semiconductors
0% of docket
0
Mechanical / Eng
0% of docket
0
Business / Other
0% of docket

Time-on-OA Estimate

Manual office-action response work runs about 10 hours per case. The time-saved bands below show what IP Author's prosecution pipeline typically delivers — a conservative 20% on the low end, 35% in the middle, 50% on the high end.

50 h
Manual time on pending OAs
10 h
Time saved (low, 20%)
18 h
Time saved (mid, 35%)
0.4 wks
FTE-weeks freed (mid)

Top Examiners on this docket

ExaminerApps on this docketAllow rateInterview lift
KIM, TAEYOON 1 51.4% +52.2%
COLLINS, CYNTHIA E 1 82.2% +9.0%
BRISTOL, LYNN ANNE 1 63.4% +39.8%
NGUYEN, QUANG 1 37.9% +52.6%
ZHONG, WAYNESHAOBIN 1 72.3% +21.4%

Hard Cases (1)

Multi-statute / §101-driven matters, or cases in front of an examiner with an allow rate under 30%. The top 1 ordered by deadline are shown.

App #TitleExaminerDue in
18737469 METHODS FOR NON-TRANSGENIC GENOME EDITING IN PLANTS COLLINS, CYNTHIA E —

Interview Candidates (4)

Cases in front of an examiner whose interview lift is 10 percentage points or more — i.e. interviewed cases historically resolve more favorably than non-interviewed ones. The top 4 ordered by deadline are shown.

App #TitleExaminerDue in
18297770 CANOLA WITH HIGH OLEIC ACID ZHONG, WAYNESHAOBIN 60d overdue
18914680 CELLULAR IMMUNOTHERAPY FOR REPETITIVE ADMINISTRATION KIM, TAEYOON —
18607387 INHIBITORY CHIMERIC ANTIGEN RECEPTORS BRISTOL, LYNN ANNE —
18530878 METHODS FOR ENGINEERING ALLOGENEIC AND IMMUNOSUPPRESSIVE RESISTANT T CELL FOR IMMUNOTHERAPY NGUYEN, QUANG —

Top Art Units

Art UnitApps
1631 2
1662 2
1643 1

Pending Office Actions

App #TitleExaminerArt UnitStatutesStatusDue inAIFiled
18914680 CELLULAR IMMUNOTHERAPY FOR REPETITIVE ADMINISTRATION KIM, TAEYOON 1631 §103§112DP Non-Final OA — Pending Oct 14, 2024
18737469 METHODS FOR NON-TRANSGENIC GENOME EDITING IN PLANTS COLLINS, CYNTHIA E 1662 §103§112 Non-Final OA — Pending Jun 07, 2024
18607387 INHIBITORY CHIMERIC ANTIGEN RECEPTORS BRISTOL, LYNN ANNE 1643 §112DP Non-Final OA — Pending Mar 15, 2024
18530878 METHODS FOR ENGINEERING ALLOGENEIC AND IMMUNOSUPPRESSIVE RESISTANT T CELL FOR IMMUNOTHERAPY NGUYEN, QUANG 1631 §102§103§112DP Non-Final OA — Pending Dec 06, 2023
18297770 CANOLA WITH HIGH OLEIC ACID ZHONG, WAYNESHAOBIN 1662 §102§103§112DP Final Rejection 60d overdue Pending Apr 10, 2023

Managing Cellectis's Patent Portfolio?

IP Author helps IP teams respond to office actions faster with AI-generated responses, examiner analytics, and prosecution intelligence.

Start Free Trial

Frequently Asked Questions

How many pending USPTO office actions does Cellectis have?

Cellectis has 5 pending office actions as of October 2026, spread across 3 art units and 5 examiners.

Which USPTO examiner handles the most Cellectis applications?

Taeyoon Kim has the most, with 1 of Cellectis's pending office actions.

What technology area are Cellectis's patent applications in?

Mostly Biotechnology & Pharmaceuticals (USPTO Tech Center 1600), based on where its pending office actions are examined.

Sign in with your work email

Enter your email to receive a magic link. No password needed.

Personal email addresses (Gmail, Yahoo, etc.) are not accepted.

Free tier: 3 strategy analyses per month