Prosecution Insights
Prosecution Insights
Technology area: Computing & Software
1 pending office actions • 1 art units • 1 examiners • 0 of 1 (0%) have an AI response strategy ready • 2 patents granted in the last 365 days
Celli S P A is active in the Computing & Software technology area with 1 pending office action. This matter is being reviewed by 1 distinct examiner, SCOTT T BADERMAN. The prosecution is currently limited to 1 distinct art unit, which suggests a focused technical review process for the company. SCOTT T BADERMAN is the busiest examiner, responsible for 1 pending office action.
The 1 pending office action represents the total current activity for the company's portfolio. With only 1 distinct examiner and 1 distinct art unit involved, the prosecution path is direct. The busiest examiner's 1 pending office action accounts for all of the entity's current patent office requirements. Practitioners can manage this portfolio with a focus on a single examiner's preferences and a single art unit's standards. This concentration of resources into a specific technological division allows for a specialized legal strategy tailored to that specific division's requirements. The data shows that the current prosecution cycle is focused on a single point of contact.
Based on the USPTO statutory response window for each pending office action. 1 of the docket's apps have a known mailing date; the rest are excluded from the tile counts.
Difficulty is derived from the rejection statutes on the most recent pending office action. §101-driven and multi-statute cases are graded Hard; §112-only and obviousness-type double-patenting cases are graded Easy; everything else is Medium. "Unknown" means we have not yet parsed a statute for that office action.
| Bucket | Cases |
|---|---|
| §101 + other | 1 (100%) |
How the docket's pending cases split across USPTO tech-center bands.
Manual office-action response work runs about 10 hours per case. The time-saved bands below show what IP Author's prosecution pipeline typically delivers — a conservative 20% on the low end, 35% in the middle, 50% on the high end.
| Examiner | Apps on this docket | Allow rate | Interview lift |
|---|---|---|---|
| BADERMAN, SCOTT T | 1 | 45.9% | +3.3% |
Multi-statute / §101-driven matters, or cases in front of an examiner with an allow rate under 30%. The top 1 ordered by deadline are shown.
| App # | Title | Examiner | Due in |
|---|---|---|---|
| 17955779 | DISPENSING SYSTEM WITH AUTO-CALIBRATION AND AUTO-CALIBRATION METHOD THEREOF | BADERMAN, SCOTT T | 42d |
| Art Unit | Apps |
|---|---|
| 2118 | 1 |
| App # | Title | Examiner | Art Unit | Statutes | Status | Due in | AI | Filed |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 17955779 | DISPENSING SYSTEM WITH AUTO-CALIBRATION AND AUTO-CALIBRATION METHOD THEREOF | BADERMAN, SCOTT T | 2118 | §101§103§112 | Final Rejection | 42d | Pending | Sep 29, 2022 |
IP Author helps IP teams respond to office actions faster with AI-generated responses, examiner analytics, and prosecution intelligence.
Start Free Trial