Prosecution Insights
Prosecution Insights
3 pending office actions • 2 art units • 3 examiners • 0 of 3 (0%) have an AI response strategy ready
Based on the USPTO statutory response window for each pending office action. 1 of the docket's apps have a known mailing date; the rest are excluded from the tile counts.
Difficulty is derived from the rejection statutes on the most recent pending office action. §101-driven and multi-statute cases are graded Hard; §112-only and obviousness-type double-patenting cases are graded Easy; everything else is Medium. "Unknown" means we have not yet parsed a statute for that office action.
| Bucket | Cases |
|---|---|
| §112 only | 1 (33%) |
| Double-patenting + other | 2 (67%) |
How the docket's pending cases split across USPTO tech-center bands.
Manual office-action response work runs about 10 hours per case. The time-saved bands below show what IP Author's prosecution pipeline typically delivers — a conservative 20% on the low end, 35% in the middle, 50% on the high end.
| Examiner | Apps on this docket | Allow rate | Interview lift |
|---|---|---|---|
| PRIEST, AARON A | 1 | 61.0% | +25.8% |
| BUNKER, AMY M | 1 | 29.1% | +45.3% |
| PULLIAM, JOSEPH CONSTANTINE | 1 | 37.3% | +28.9% |
Multi-statute / §101-driven matters, or cases in front of an examiner with an allow rate under 30%. The top 1 ordered by deadline are shown.
| App # | Title | Examiner | Due in |
|---|---|---|---|
| 16551620 | SAMPLE MULTIPLEXING USING CARBOHYDRATE-BINDING AND MEMBRANE-PERMEABLE REAGENTS | BUNKER, AMY M | 19d |
Cases in front of an examiner whose interview lift is 10 percentage points or more — i.e. interviewed cases historically resolve more favorably than non-interviewed ones. The top 3 ordered by deadline are shown.
| App # | Title | Examiner | Due in |
|---|---|---|---|
| 16551620 | SAMPLE MULTIPLEXING USING CARBOHYDRATE-BINDING AND MEMBRANE-PERMEABLE REAGENTS | BUNKER, AMY M | 19d |
| 18627190 | Precise Delivery of Components into Fluids | PRIEST, AARON A | — |
| 16540971 | APTAMER BARCODING | PULLIAM, JOSEPH CONSTANTINE | — |
| Art Unit | Apps |
|---|---|
| 1684 | 1 |
| 1687 | 1 |
| App # | Title | Examiner | Art Unit | Statutes | Status | Due in | AI | Filed |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 18627190 | Precise Delivery of Components into Fluids | PRIEST, AARON A | — | §102§112DP | Non-Final OA | — | Pending | Apr 04, 2024 |
| 16551620 | SAMPLE MULTIPLEXING USING CARBOHYDRATE-BINDING AND MEMBRANE-PERMEABLE REAGENTS | BUNKER, AMY M | 1684 | §112 | Non-Final OA | 19d | Pending | Aug 26, 2019 |
| 16540971 | APTAMER BARCODING | PULLIAM, JOSEPH CONSTANTINE | 1687 | §102§103DP | Final Rejection | — | Pending | Aug 14, 2019 |
IP Author helps IP teams respond to office actions faster with AI-generated responses, examiner analytics, and prosecution intelligence.
Start Free Trial