Prosecution Insights
Prosecution Insights
Technology area: Transportation, E-Commerce & Mechanical Systems
1 pending office actions • 1 art units • 1 examiners • 0 of 1 (0%) have an AI response strategy ready
Cerebrum Holding Corp. has 1 pending office action in the Transportation, E-Commerce & Mechanical Systems technology area. This action is assigned to 1 distinct examiner and 1 distinct art unit. This configuration indicates a highly focused prosecution environment where a single reviewer in one specialized group is evaluating the company's current application.
HRANEK, KAREN AMANDA is the busiest examiner for the portfolio. This examiner is currently managing the 1 pending office action. Because the active portfolio is limited to this single matter, the prosecution strategy is entirely dependent on the specific requirements and feedback of this individual examiner. This allows for a concentrated effort on a single set of examiner preferences.
The 1 distinct art unit involved suggests a specific technical niche within the Transportation, E-Commerce & Mechanical Systems sector. The 1 pending office action assigned to HRANEK, KAREN AMANDA represents the total current workload for the company at the patent office. Practitioners should focus on the specific examination history of this examiner within the identified art unit to navigate the current prosecution effectively.
Based on the USPTO statutory response window for each pending office action. 1 of the docket's apps have a known mailing date; the rest are excluded from the tile counts.
Difficulty is derived from the rejection statutes on the most recent pending office action. §101-driven and multi-statute cases are graded Hard; §112-only and obviousness-type double-patenting cases are graded Easy; everything else is Medium. "Unknown" means we have not yet parsed a statute for that office action.
| Bucket | Cases |
|---|---|
| Multi-statute (no §101) | 1 (100%) |
How the docket's pending cases split across USPTO tech-center bands.
Manual office-action response work runs about 10 hours per case. The time-saved bands below show what IP Author's prosecution pipeline typically delivers — a conservative 20% on the low end, 35% in the middle, 50% on the high end.
| Examiner | Apps on this docket | Allow rate | Interview lift |
|---|---|---|---|
| HRANEK, KAREN AMANDA | 1 | 34.5% | +39.9% |
Multi-statute / §101-driven matters, or cases in front of an examiner with an allow rate under 30%. The top 1 ordered by deadline are shown.
| App # | Title | Examiner | Due in |
|---|---|---|---|
| 18752670 | MACRO-BASED DIAGNOSES FOR ANATOMIC PATHOLOGY | HRANEK, KAREN AMANDA | 39d |
Cases in front of an examiner whose interview lift is 10 percentage points or more — i.e. interviewed cases historically resolve more favorably than non-interviewed ones. The top 1 ordered by deadline are shown.
| App # | Title | Examiner | Due in |
|---|---|---|---|
| 18752670 | MACRO-BASED DIAGNOSES FOR ANATOMIC PATHOLOGY | HRANEK, KAREN AMANDA | 39d |
| Art Unit | Apps |
|---|---|
| 3684 | 1 |
| App # | Title | Examiner | Art Unit | Statutes | Status | Due in | AI | Filed |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 18752670 | MACRO-BASED DIAGNOSES FOR ANATOMIC PATHOLOGY | HRANEK, KAREN AMANDA | 3684 | §103§112Other | Non-Final OA | 39d | Pending | Jun 24, 2024 |
IP Author helps IP teams respond to office actions faster with AI-generated responses, examiner analytics, and prosecution intelligence.
Start Free Trial