Prosecution Insights
Last updated: October 25, 2026

Challenger Group LLC

1 pending office actions • 0 art units • 1 examiners • 0 of 1 (0%) have an AI response strategy ready

Analysis

Challenger Group LLC currently manages a patent portfolio with 1 pending office action. This active matter is assigned to 1 distinct examiner, DINKEL, JOHN LOUIS, who is responsible for the review of the company's claims. The data indicates that 0 distinct art units are currently associated with the pending workload, suggesting a unique or yet-to-be-classified status for the filing.

As the busiest examiner, DINKEL, JOHN LOUIS is currently overseeing the 1 pending office action. This creates a highly concentrated prosecution environment where the outcome of the company's patent efforts depends on a single individual. For practitioners, this concentration requires a focused strategy to address the specific requirements of this examiner, as the entire pending portfolio is under their review.

Written from this page's own data; every figure is computed from USPTO records and verified before publication.

Portfolio Summary

1
Total Pending OAs
1
Non-Final OAs
0
Final Rejections
0
Advisory / Quayle

Case Difficulty Mix

Difficulty is derived from the rejection statutes on the most recent pending office action. §101-driven and multi-statute cases are graded Hard; §112-only and obviousness-type double-patenting cases are graded Easy; everything else is Medium. "Unknown" means we have not yet parsed a statute for that office action.

1
Hard (100%)
0
Medium (0%)
0
Easy (0%)
0
Unknown (0%)

Rejection Statute Mix

BucketCases
Multi-statute (no §101)1 (100%)

Industry Mix

How the docket's pending cases split across USPTO tech-center bands.

0
Life Sciences
0% of docket
0
Information Tech
0% of docket
0
Communications
0% of docket
0
Semiconductors
0% of docket
0
Mechanical / Eng
0% of docket
1
Business / Other
100% of docket

Time-on-OA Estimate

Manual office-action response work runs about 10 hours per case. The time-saved bands below show what IP Author's prosecution pipeline typically delivers — a conservative 20% on the low end, 35% in the middle, 50% on the high end.

10 h
Manual time on pending OAs
2 h
Time saved (low, 20%)
4 h
Time saved (mid, 35%)
0.1 wks
FTE-weeks freed (mid)

Top Examiners on this docket

ExaminerApps on this docketAllow rateInterview lift
DINKEL, JOHN LOUIS 1 — —

Hard Cases (1)

Multi-statute / §101-driven matters, or cases in front of an examiner with an allow rate under 30%. The top 1 ordered by deadline are shown.

App #TitleExaminerDue in
19083193 Load Transport System DINKEL, JOHN LOUIS —

Pending Office Actions

App #TitleExaminerArt UnitStatutesStatusDue inAIFiled
19083193 Load Transport System DINKEL, JOHN LOUIS — §102§103§112 Non-Final OA — Pending Mar 18, 2025

Managing Challenger Group LLC's Patent Portfolio?

IP Author helps IP teams respond to office actions faster with AI-generated responses, examiner analytics, and prosecution intelligence.

Start Free Trial

Frequently Asked Questions

How many pending USPTO office actions does Challenger Group LLC have?

Challenger Group LLC has 1 pending office actions as of October 2026, spread across 0 art units and 1 examiners.

Which USPTO examiner handles the most Challenger Group LLC applications?

John Louis Dinkel has the most, with 1 of Challenger Group LLC's pending office actions.

Sign in with your work email

Enter your email to receive a magic link. No password needed.

Personal email addresses (Gmail, Yahoo, etc.) are not accepted.

Free tier: 3 strategy analyses per month