Prosecution Insights
Last updated: October 25, 2026

Championx Usa Inc.

Technology area: Chemistry & Materials

3 pending office actions • 3 art units • 3 examiners • 0 of 3 (0%) have an AI response strategy ready • 3 patents granted in the last 365 days

Analysis

Championx Usa Inc. is currently managing 3 pending office actions in the Chemistry & Materials technology area. The portfolio is distributed across 3 distinct examiners and 3 distinct art units, indicating that each pending application is being reviewed in a different technical or administrative context. This variety suggests a diverse range of chemical technologies within the company's active filings. The use of 3 distinct art units further highlights the breadth of the company's current patenting activities at the USPTO.

The busiest examiner for the portfolio is CLEVELAND, TIMOTHY C, who is responsible for 1 pending office action. Because the 3 pending actions are split among 3 distinct examiners, the workload is not concentrated under any single individual. This distribution across 3 distinct examiners requires the company to manage various examiner styles and technical requirements within the Chemistry & Materials sector. Practitioners should be prepared to address the specific nuances of 3 different art units as they progress through the prosecution of these pending matters. The 3 distinct examiners involved ensure that the portfolio's outcomes are not dependent on any single individual's review.

Written from this page's own data; every figure is computed from USPTO records and verified before publication.

Portfolio Summary

3
Total Pending OAs
1
Non-Final OAs
2
Final Rejections
0
Advisory / Quayle

Response Deadline Pressure

Based on the USPTO statutory response window for each pending office action. 2 of the docket's apps have a known mailing date; the rest are excluded from the tile counts.

0
Overdue
1
Due this week
0
Due this month
0
Due in next 60 days
1
Due later

Case Difficulty Mix

Difficulty is derived from the rejection statutes on the most recent pending office action. §101-driven and multi-statute cases are graded Hard; §112-only and obviousness-type double-patenting cases are graded Easy; everything else is Medium. "Unknown" means we have not yet parsed a statute for that office action.

2
Hard (67%)
1
Medium (33%)
0
Easy (0%)
0
Unknown (0%)

Rejection Statute Mix

BucketCases
§103 only1 (33%)
Multi-statute (no §101)2 (67%)

Industry Mix

How the docket's pending cases split across USPTO tech-center bands.

3
Life Sciences
100% of docket
0
Information Tech
0% of docket
0
Communications
0% of docket
0
Semiconductors
0% of docket
0
Mechanical / Eng
0% of docket
0
Business / Other
0% of docket

Time-on-OA Estimate

Manual office-action response work runs about 10 hours per case. The time-saved bands below show what IP Author's prosecution pipeline typically delivers — a conservative 20% on the low end, 35% in the middle, 50% on the high end.

30 h
Manual time on pending OAs
6 h
Time saved (low, 20%)
10 h
Time saved (mid, 35%)
0.3 wks
FTE-weeks freed (mid)

Top Examiners on this docket

ExaminerApps on this docketAllow rateInterview lift
CLEVELAND, TIMOTHY C 1 59.7% +18.5%
WASHVILLE, JEFFREY D 1 80.1% -4.6%
ANTHONY, JOSEPH DAVID 1 73.2% +5.3%

Quick Wins (1)

Cases in front of an examiner with an allow rate of 80%+ where the difficulty is Easy or Medium. The top 1 ordered by deadline are shown.

App #TitleExaminerDue in
18343269 TREATMENT CHEMICAL CARTRIDGES AND METHODS OF USING THE SAME WASHVILLE, JEFFREY D —

Hard Cases (2)

Multi-statute / §101-driven matters, or cases in front of an examiner with an allow rate under 30%. The top 2 ordered by deadline are shown.

App #TitleExaminerDue in
18323662 CHEMICAL TREATMENT COMPOSITIONS AND METHODS OF USING THE SAME ANTHONY, JOSEPH DAVID 7d
18452245 CORROSION INHIBITOR COMPOSITIONS AND METHODS OF USING THE SAME CLEVELAND, TIMOTHY C 76d

Interview Candidates (1)

Cases in front of an examiner whose interview lift is 10 percentage points or more — i.e. interviewed cases historically resolve more favorably than non-interviewed ones. The top 1 ordered by deadline are shown.

App #TitleExaminerDue in
18452245 CORROSION INHIBITOR COMPOSITIONS AND METHODS OF USING THE SAME CLEVELAND, TIMOTHY C 76d

Top Art Units

Art UnitApps
1774 1
1766 1
1764 1

Pending Office Actions

App #TitleExaminerArt UnitStatutesStatusDue inAIFiled
18452245 CORROSION INHIBITOR COMPOSITIONS AND METHODS OF USING THE SAME CLEVELAND, TIMOTHY C 1774 §103§112 Non-Final OA 76d Pending Aug 18, 2023
18343269 TREATMENT CHEMICAL CARTRIDGES AND METHODS OF USING THE SAME WASHVILLE, JEFFREY D 1766 §103 Final Rejection — Pending Jun 28, 2023
18323662 CHEMICAL TREATMENT COMPOSITIONS AND METHODS OF USING THE SAME ANTHONY, JOSEPH DAVID 1764 §102§103§112 Final Rejection 7d Pending May 25, 2023

Managing Championx Usa Inc.'s Patent Portfolio?

IP Author helps IP teams respond to office actions faster with AI-generated responses, examiner analytics, and prosecution intelligence.

Start Free Trial

Frequently Asked Questions

How many pending USPTO office actions does Championx Usa Inc. have?

Championx Usa Inc. has 3 pending office actions as of October 2026, spread across 3 art units and 3 examiners.

Which USPTO examiner handles the most Championx Usa Inc. applications?

Timothy C Cleveland has the most, with 1 of Championx Usa Inc.'s pending office actions.

What technology area are Championx Usa Inc.'s patent applications in?

Mostly Chemistry & Materials (USPTO Tech Center 1700), based on where its pending office actions are examined.

Sign in with your work email

Enter your email to receive a magic link. No password needed.

Personal email addresses (Gmail, Yahoo, etc.) are not accepted.

Free tier: 3 strategy analyses per month