Prosecution Insights
Last updated: October 25, 2026

Chapman University

Technology area: Biotechnology & Pharmaceuticals

2 pending office actions • 2 art units • 2 examiners • 0 of 2 (0%) have an AI response strategy ready • 2 patents granted in the last 365 days

Analysis

Chapman University currently manages 2 pending office actions in the Biotechnology & Pharmaceuticals technology area. The portfolio's workload is distributed, with the 2 actions assigned to 2 distinct examiners across 2 distinct art units. This distribution indicates that the university is pursuing multiple distinct technical paths within the life sciences sector. The involvement of 2 distinct art units suggests that the pending applications cover different specialized areas of biotechnology.

The busiest examiner for the portfolio is HOPKINS, SAMANTHA LAKE, who is responsible for 1 pending office action. Because the 2 pending actions are split between 2 distinct examiners, each examiner handles a portion of the active prosecution. This arrangement requires the university to coordinate responses across different art units and examiner perspectives within the Biotechnology & Pharmaceuticals field. With 2 distinct examiners involved, the university must manage separate prosecution timelines and sets of examiner requirements. The 2 distinct art units further emphasize the technical variety in the university's current USPTO filings. This structure ensures that the portfolio's outcomes are not dependent on any single individual's review.

Written from this page's own data; every figure is computed from USPTO records and verified before publication.

Portfolio Summary

2
Total Pending OAs
2
Non-Final OAs
0
Final Rejections
0
Advisory / Quayle

Response Deadline Pressure

Based on the USPTO statutory response window for each pending office action. 1 of the docket's apps have a known mailing date; the rest are excluded from the tile counts.

1
Overdue
0
Due this week
0
Due this month
0
Due in next 60 days
0
Due later

Case Difficulty Mix

Difficulty is derived from the rejection statutes on the most recent pending office action. §101-driven and multi-statute cases are graded Hard; §112-only and obviousness-type double-patenting cases are graded Easy; everything else is Medium. "Unknown" means we have not yet parsed a statute for that office action.

2
Hard (100%)
0
Medium (0%)
0
Easy (0%)
0
Unknown (0%)

Rejection Statute Mix

BucketCases
Multi-statute (no §101)2 (100%)

Industry Mix

How the docket's pending cases split across USPTO tech-center bands.

2
Life Sciences
100% of docket
0
Information Tech
0% of docket
0
Communications
0% of docket
0
Semiconductors
0% of docket
0
Mechanical / Eng
0% of docket
0
Business / Other
0% of docket

Time-on-OA Estimate

Manual office-action response work runs about 10 hours per case. The time-saved bands below show what IP Author's prosecution pipeline typically delivers — a conservative 20% on the low end, 35% in the middle, 50% on the high end.

20 h
Manual time on pending OAs
4 h
Time saved (low, 20%)
7 h
Time saved (mid, 35%)
0.2 wks
FTE-weeks freed (mid)

Top Examiners on this docket

ExaminerApps on this docketAllow rateInterview lift
HOPKINS, SAMANTHA LAKE 1 60.7% +61.5%
PALENIK, JEFFREY T 1 53.5% +27.0%

Hard Cases (2)

Multi-statute / §101-driven matters, or cases in front of an examiner with an allow rate under 30%. The top 2 ordered by deadline are shown.

App #TitleExaminerDue in
18452405 EGFR TARGETING PEPTIDE CONJUGATE HOPKINS, SAMANTHA LAKE 58d overdue
18222775 NANOMEDICINES FOR TREATMENT OF DISEASE PALENIK, JEFFREY T —

Interview Candidates (2)

Cases in front of an examiner whose interview lift is 10 percentage points or more — i.e. interviewed cases historically resolve more favorably than non-interviewed ones. The top 2 ordered by deadline are shown.

App #TitleExaminerDue in
18452405 EGFR TARGETING PEPTIDE CONJUGATE HOPKINS, SAMANTHA LAKE 58d overdue
18222775 NANOMEDICINES FOR TREATMENT OF DISEASE PALENIK, JEFFREY T —

Top Art Units

Art UnitApps
1641 1
1615 1

Pending Office Actions

App #TitleExaminerArt UnitStatutesStatusDue inAIFiled
18452405 EGFR TARGETING PEPTIDE CONJUGATE HOPKINS, SAMANTHA LAKE 1641 §103§112 Non-Final OA 58d overdue Pending Aug 18, 2023
18222775 NANOMEDICINES FOR TREATMENT OF DISEASE PALENIK, JEFFREY T 1615 §103§112 Non-Final OA — Pending Jul 17, 2023

Managing Chapman University's Patent Portfolio?

IP Author helps IP teams respond to office actions faster with AI-generated responses, examiner analytics, and prosecution intelligence.

Start Free Trial

Frequently Asked Questions

How many pending USPTO office actions does Chapman University have?

Chapman University has 2 pending office actions as of October 2026, spread across 2 art units and 2 examiners.

Which USPTO examiner handles the most Chapman University applications?

Samantha Lake Hopkins has the most, with 1 of Chapman University's pending office actions.

What technology area are Chapman University's patent applications in?

Mostly Biotechnology & Pharmaceuticals (USPTO Tech Center 1600), based on where its pending office actions are examined.

Sign in with your work email

Enter your email to receive a magic link. No password needed.

Personal email addresses (Gmail, Yahoo, etc.) are not accepted.

Free tier: 3 strategy analyses per month