Prosecution Insights
Prosecution Insights
Technology area: Transportation, E-Commerce & Mechanical Systems
1 pending office actions • 1 art units • 1 examiners • 0 of 1 (0%) have an AI response strategy ready
Charu Software Solutions LLC currently has 1 pending office action in the Transportation, E-Commerce & Mechanical Systems technology area. This active case is assigned to 1 distinct examiner, COVINGTON, AMANDA R, who also serves as the busiest examiner for the portfolio. The prosecution is confined to 1 distinct art unit, indicating a narrow technical focus for the company's current patenting efforts. COVINGTON, AMANDA R is responsible for 1 busiest examiner pending action, representing the full extent of the company's active prosecution.
The presence of 1 pending office action under the review of 1 distinct examiner suggests a simplified management process for the applicant. Since the workload is concentrated in 1 distinct art unit within the Transportation, E-Commerce & Mechanical Systems sector, the legal strategy does not need to account for varying art unit standards. Practitioners can focus exclusively on the requirements of COVINGTON, AMANDA R, as this examiner handles the 1 busiest examiner pending action. This lack of distribution across multiple personnel or divisions allows for a highly consistent and focused approach to the company's pending intellectual property.
Based on the USPTO statutory response window for each pending office action. 1 of the docket's apps have a known mailing date; the rest are excluded from the tile counts.
Difficulty is derived from the rejection statutes on the most recent pending office action. §101-driven and multi-statute cases are graded Hard; §112-only and obviousness-type double-patenting cases are graded Easy; everything else is Medium. "Unknown" means we have not yet parsed a statute for that office action.
| Bucket | Cases |
|---|---|
| §101 + other | 1 (100%) |
How the docket's pending cases split across USPTO tech-center bands.
Manual office-action response work runs about 10 hours per case. The time-saved bands below show what IP Author's prosecution pipeline typically delivers — a conservative 20% on the low end, 35% in the middle, 50% on the high end.
| Examiner | Apps on this docket | Allow rate | Interview lift |
|---|---|---|---|
| COVINGTON, AMANDA R | 1 | 21.8% | +28.5% |
Multi-statute / §101-driven matters, or cases in front of an examiner with an allow rate under 30%. The top 1 ordered by deadline are shown.
| App # | Title | Examiner | Due in |
|---|---|---|---|
| 18455496 | INCREASED ACCURACY OF RELAYED MEDICAL INFORMATION | COVINGTON, AMANDA R | 35d overdue |
Cases in front of an examiner whose interview lift is 10 percentage points or more — i.e. interviewed cases historically resolve more favorably than non-interviewed ones. The top 1 ordered by deadline are shown.
| App # | Title | Examiner | Due in |
|---|---|---|---|
| 18455496 | INCREASED ACCURACY OF RELAYED MEDICAL INFORMATION | COVINGTON, AMANDA R | 35d overdue |
| Art Unit | Apps |
|---|---|
| 3686 | 1 |
| App # | Title | Examiner | Art Unit | Statutes | Status | Due in | AI | Filed |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 18455496 | INCREASED ACCURACY OF RELAYED MEDICAL INFORMATION | COVINGTON, AMANDA R | 3686 | §101§112 | Non-Final OA | 35d overdue | Pending | Aug 24, 2023 |
IP Author helps IP teams respond to office actions faster with AI-generated responses, examiner analytics, and prosecution intelligence.
Start Free Trial