Prosecution Insights
Prosecution Insights
Technology area: Transportation, E-Commerce & Mechanical Systems
1 pending office actions • 1 art units • 1 examiners • 0 of 1 (0%) have an AI response strategy ready
Checkmyspot Inc. is prosecuting a portfolio in Transportation, E-Commerce & Mechanical Systems with 1 pending office action. This action is handled by 1 distinct examiner and 1 distinct art unit. This reflects a focused effort to protect innovations within a specific technical group at the patent office, allowing for a concentrated prosecution strategy.
SHELDEN, BION A is the busiest examiner for this portfolio, currently managing the 1 pending office action. With 1 distinct examiner and 1 distinct art unit involved, the prosecution strategy is highly centralized. The company's primary goal is to satisfy the specific technical requirements of this single examiner to move the pending application forward. By focusing on the 1 pending office action, the applicant can work toward a resolution within the 1 distinct art unit, ensuring that all arguments are tailored to the specific perspective of the 1 distinct examiner assigned to the case.
Based on the USPTO statutory response window for each pending office action. 1 of the docket's apps have a known mailing date; the rest are excluded from the tile counts.
Difficulty is derived from the rejection statutes on the most recent pending office action. §101-driven and multi-statute cases are graded Hard; §112-only and obviousness-type double-patenting cases are graded Easy; everything else is Medium. "Unknown" means we have not yet parsed a statute for that office action.
| Bucket | Cases |
|---|---|
| §101 + other | 1 (100%) |
How the docket's pending cases split across USPTO tech-center bands.
Manual office-action response work runs about 10 hours per case. The time-saved bands below show what IP Author's prosecution pipeline typically delivers — a conservative 20% on the low end, 35% in the middle, 50% on the high end.
| Examiner | Apps on this docket | Allow rate | Interview lift |
|---|---|---|---|
| SHELDEN, BION A | 1 | 22.5% | +18.7% |
Multi-statute / §101-driven matters, or cases in front of an examiner with an allow rate under 30%. The top 1 ordered by deadline are shown.
| App # | Title | Examiner | Due in |
|---|---|---|---|
| 18790905 | TELEMEDICINE PLATFORM FOR LOCATION-BASED PROVIDER SCREENING AND REFERRAL | SHELDEN, BION A | 4d overdue |
Cases in front of an examiner whose interview lift is 10 percentage points or more — i.e. interviewed cases historically resolve more favorably than non-interviewed ones. The top 1 ordered by deadline are shown.
| App # | Title | Examiner | Due in |
|---|---|---|---|
| 18790905 | TELEMEDICINE PLATFORM FOR LOCATION-BASED PROVIDER SCREENING AND REFERRAL | SHELDEN, BION A | 4d overdue |
| Art Unit | Apps |
|---|---|
| 3685 | 1 |
| App # | Title | Examiner | Art Unit | Statutes | Status | Due in | AI | Filed |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 18790905 | TELEMEDICINE PLATFORM FOR LOCATION-BASED PROVIDER SCREENING AND REFERRAL | SHELDEN, BION A | 3685 | §101§103§112 | Non-Final OA | 4d overdue | Pending | Jul 31, 2024 |
IP Author helps IP teams respond to office actions faster with AI-generated responses, examiner analytics, and prosecution intelligence.
Start Free Trial