Prosecution Insights
Prosecution Insights
Technology area: Transportation, E-Commerce & Mechanical Systems
1 pending office actions • 1 art units • 1 examiners • 0 of 1 (0%) have an AI response strategy ready
Chetannlee LLC currently manages a patent portfolio with 1 pending office action. This activity is located within the Transportation, E-Commerce & Mechanical Systems technology area. The presence of 1 distinct examiner and 1 distinct art unit indicates a centralized prosecution effort at this stage. This focus suggests that the company is navigating a specific niche within its technology sector, requiring a dedicated approach to its intellectual property strategy. The concentration in the assigned art unit allows the applicant to focus legal arguments on a specific set of technical standards.
The busiest examiner for this portfolio is CLARE, MARK C, who is responsible for the 1 busiest examiner pending office action. Because the total number of pending office actions is 1, this examiner handles the entirety of the company's current workload. Practitioners should note that the prosecution strategy is tied to the findings of a single examiner in a single art unit, which impacts the coordination of responses and concentrates the outcome risk on the assigned reviewer. The alignment of 1 distinct examiner with the pending office action allows for a direct dialogue during the examination process, which can be useful for resolving complex technical rejections.
Based on the USPTO statutory response window for each pending office action. 1 of the docket's apps have a known mailing date; the rest are excluded from the tile counts.
Difficulty is derived from the rejection statutes on the most recent pending office action. §101-driven and multi-statute cases are graded Hard; §112-only and obviousness-type double-patenting cases are graded Easy; everything else is Medium. "Unknown" means we have not yet parsed a statute for that office action.
| Bucket | Cases |
|---|---|
| §101 + other | 1 (100%) |
How the docket's pending cases split across USPTO tech-center bands.
Manual office-action response work runs about 10 hours per case. The time-saved bands below show what IP Author's prosecution pipeline typically delivers — a conservative 20% on the low end, 35% in the middle, 50% on the high end.
| Examiner | Apps on this docket | Allow rate | Interview lift |
|---|---|---|---|
| CLARE, MARK C | 1 | 14.2% | +19.9% |
Multi-statute / §101-driven matters, or cases in front of an examiner with an allow rate under 30%. The top 1 ordered by deadline are shown.
| App # | Title | Examiner | Due in |
|---|---|---|---|
| 19232502 | Process, System and Method for Automated Property Transformation in Community Association Delinquent Unit Owner Claims Recovery | CLARE, MARK C | 27d |
Cases in front of an examiner whose interview lift is 10 percentage points or more — i.e. interviewed cases historically resolve more favorably than non-interviewed ones. The top 1 ordered by deadline are shown.
| App # | Title | Examiner | Due in |
|---|---|---|---|
| 19232502 | Process, System and Method for Automated Property Transformation in Community Association Delinquent Unit Owner Claims Recovery | CLARE, MARK C | 27d |
| Art Unit | Apps |
|---|---|
| 3628 | 1 |
| App # | Title | Examiner | Art Unit | Statutes | Status | Due in | AI | Filed |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 19232502 | Process, System and Method for Automated Property Transformation in Community Association Delinquent Unit Owner Claims Recovery | CLARE, MARK C | 3628 | §101§103§112 | Non-Final OA | 27d | Pending | Jun 09, 2025 |
IP Author helps IP teams respond to office actions faster with AI-generated responses, examiner analytics, and prosecution intelligence.
Start Free Trial