Prosecution Insights
Prosecution Insights
Technology area: Chemistry & Materials
1 pending office actions • 1 art units • 1 examiners • 0 of 1 (0%) have an AI response strategy ready • 1 patents granted in the last 365 days
Cibt America Inc. is currently processing 1 pending office action in the Chemistry & Materials technology area. This case is assigned to 1 distinct examiner and 1 distinct art unit. The current prosecution activity is limited to this technical matter. Practitioners can direct their attention to the requirements of the 1 art unit involved in this case. This arrangement allows for a specific response to the outstanding issues in the Chemistry & Materials sector.
The busiest examiner for the company is PIZIALI, ANDREW T, who is responsible for 1 pending office action. This figure represents the total pending workload for the company. Because the portfolio involves 1 distinct examiner, the prosecution strategy is tied to the individual perspective of this examiner. The outcome of the company's current patent efforts depends on the specific standards applied by PIZIALI, ANDREW T. The 1 pending office action defines the company's current engagement with the patent office.
Difficulty is derived from the rejection statutes on the most recent pending office action. §101-driven and multi-statute cases are graded Hard; §112-only and obviousness-type double-patenting cases are graded Easy; everything else is Medium. "Unknown" means we have not yet parsed a statute for that office action.
| Bucket | Cases |
|---|---|
| §103 only | 1 (100%) |
How the docket's pending cases split across USPTO tech-center bands.
Manual office-action response work runs about 10 hours per case. The time-saved bands below show what IP Author's prosecution pipeline typically delivers — a conservative 20% on the low end, 35% in the middle, 50% on the high end.
| Examiner | Apps on this docket | Allow rate | Interview lift |
|---|---|---|---|
| PIZIALI, ANDREW T | 1 | 28.3% | +27.3% |
Multi-statute / §101-driven matters, or cases in front of an examiner with an allow rate under 30%. The top 1 ordered by deadline are shown.
| App # | Title | Examiner | Due in |
|---|---|---|---|
| 17637093 | POLYAMIDE 56 FIBRE WITH LOW BOILING WATER SHRINKAGE RATE, PREPARATION METHOD THEREFOR, AND APPLICATION THEREOF | PIZIALI, ANDREW T | — |
Cases in front of an examiner whose interview lift is 10 percentage points or more — i.e. interviewed cases historically resolve more favorably than non-interviewed ones. The top 1 ordered by deadline are shown.
| App # | Title | Examiner | Due in |
|---|---|---|---|
| 17637093 | POLYAMIDE 56 FIBRE WITH LOW BOILING WATER SHRINKAGE RATE, PREPARATION METHOD THEREFOR, AND APPLICATION THEREOF | PIZIALI, ANDREW T | — |
| Art Unit | Apps |
|---|---|
| 1789 | 1 |
| App # | Title | Examiner | Art Unit | Statutes | Status | Due in | AI | Filed |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 17637093 | POLYAMIDE 56 FIBRE WITH LOW BOILING WATER SHRINKAGE RATE, PREPARATION METHOD THEREFOR, AND APPLICATION THEREOF | PIZIALI, ANDREW T | 1789 | §103 | Final Rejection | — | Pending | Feb 22, 2022 |
IP Author helps IP teams respond to office actions faster with AI-generated responses, examiner analytics, and prosecution intelligence.
Start Free Trial