Prosecution Insights
Prosecution Insights
Technology area: Computing & Software
2 pending office actions • 1 art units • 1 examiners • 0 of 2 (0%) have an AI response strategy ready
Cigent Technology Inc. currently manages 2 pending office actions within the Computing & Software technology area. These matters are concentrated under 1 distinct examiner and 1 distinct art unit, indicating a focused prosecution environment. This concentration suggests that the company's current legal strategy in this sector is being funneled through a specific channel at the patent office.
The busiest examiner for the portfolio is MAMO, ELIAS, who is responsible for 2 pending office actions. This concentration means that all current pending actions for the company are assigned to this individual. Practitioners should note that the pending portfolio is subject to the specific examination style and procedural preferences of this person. The lack of examiner diversity within the 1 distinct art unit means that outcomes for the matters are likely to be correlated based on the examiner's past behavior. The alignment of all active cases under a single point of contact simplifies communication but increases dependency on a single perspective in the Computing & Software field.
Based on the USPTO statutory response window for each pending office action. 2 of the docket's apps have a known mailing date; the rest are excluded from the tile counts.
Difficulty is derived from the rejection statutes on the most recent pending office action. §101-driven and multi-statute cases are graded Hard; §112-only and obviousness-type double-patenting cases are graded Easy; everything else is Medium. "Unknown" means we have not yet parsed a statute for that office action.
| Bucket | Cases |
|---|---|
| §103 only | 2 (100%) |
How the docket's pending cases split across USPTO tech-center bands.
Manual office-action response work runs about 10 hours per case. The time-saved bands below show what IP Author's prosecution pipeline typically delivers — a conservative 20% on the low end, 35% in the middle, 50% on the high end.
| Examiner | Apps on this docket | Allow rate | Interview lift |
|---|---|---|---|
| MAMO, ELIAS | 2 | 82.8% | +5.9% |
Cases in front of an examiner with an allow rate of 80%+ where the difficulty is Easy or Medium. The top 2 ordered by deadline are shown.
| App # | Title | Examiner | Due in |
|---|---|---|---|
| 18931206 | METHOD AND SYSTEM FOR IMPROVED DATA CONTROL AND ACCESS | MAMO, ELIAS | 53d overdue |
| 18931271 | METHOD AND SYSTEM FOR IMPROVED DATA CONTROL AND ACCESS | MAMO, ELIAS | 49d overdue |
| Art Unit | Apps |
|---|---|
| 2184 | 2 |
| App # | Title | Examiner | Art Unit | Statutes | Status | Due in | AI | Filed |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 18931206 | METHOD AND SYSTEM FOR IMPROVED DATA CONTROL AND ACCESS | MAMO, ELIAS | 2184 | §103 | Final Rejection | 53d overdue | Pending | Oct 30, 2024 |
| 18931271 | METHOD AND SYSTEM FOR IMPROVED DATA CONTROL AND ACCESS | MAMO, ELIAS | 2184 | §103 | Final Rejection | 49d overdue | Pending | Oct 30, 2024 |
IP Author helps IP teams respond to office actions faster with AI-generated responses, examiner analytics, and prosecution intelligence.
Start Free Trial