Prosecution Insights
Last updated: October 04, 2026

Ciimate Master Inc.

1 pending office actions • 0 art units • 1 examiners • 0 of 1 (0%) have an AI response strategy ready

Analysis

Ciimate Master Inc. currently has 1 pending office action in its patent portfolio. This matter is assigned to 1 distinct examiner, TRPISOVSKY, JOSEPH F, who is the busiest examiner with 1 pending office action. The portfolio shows 0 distinct art units for this pending activity, representing a single, focused point of contact with the patent office. This concentration allows for a direct and singular focus on the requirements of the individual examiner involved.

With only 1 distinct examiner involved, the company's current interactions with the patent office are highly individualized. Practitioners should focus on the specific feedback from TRPISOVSKY, JOSEPH F to advance the 1 pending office action. The absence of multiple art units or examiners simplifies the prosecution strategy, as there are no competing administrative divisions to navigate for the active portfolio.

Written from this page's own data; every figure is computed from USPTO records and verified before publication.

Portfolio Summary

1
Total Pending OAs
1
Non-Final OAs
0
Final Rejections
0
Advisory / Quayle

Case Difficulty Mix

Difficulty is derived from the rejection statutes on the most recent pending office action. §101-driven and multi-statute cases are graded Hard; §112-only and obviousness-type double-patenting cases are graded Easy; everything else is Medium. "Unknown" means we have not yet parsed a statute for that office action.

1
Hard (100%)
0
Medium (0%)
0
Easy (0%)
0
Unknown (0%)

Rejection Statute Mix

BucketCases
Multi-statute (no §101)1 (100%)

Industry Mix

How the docket's pending cases split across USPTO tech-center bands.

0
Life Sciences
0% of docket
0
Information Tech
0% of docket
0
Communications
0% of docket
0
Semiconductors
0% of docket
0
Mechanical / Eng
0% of docket
1
Business / Other
100% of docket

Time-on-OA Estimate

Manual office-action response work runs about 10 hours per case. The time-saved bands below show what IP Author's prosecution pipeline typically delivers — a conservative 20% on the low end, 35% in the middle, 50% on the high end.

10 h
Manual time on pending OAs
2 h
Time saved (low, 20%)
4 h
Time saved (mid, 35%)
0.1 wks
FTE-weeks freed (mid)

Top Examiners on this docket

ExaminerApps on this docketAllow rateInterview lift
TRPISOVSKY, JOSEPH F 1 70.1% +20.0%

Hard Cases (1)

Multi-statute / §101-driven matters, or cases in front of an examiner with an allow rate under 30%. The top 1 ordered by deadline are shown.

App #TitleExaminerDue in
18989667 HYBRID HEAT PUMP WITH IMPROVED DEHUMIDIFICATION TRPISOVSKY, JOSEPH F —

Interview Candidates (1)

Cases in front of an examiner whose interview lift is 10 percentage points or more — i.e. interviewed cases historically resolve more favorably than non-interviewed ones. The top 1 ordered by deadline are shown.

App #TitleExaminerDue in
18989667 HYBRID HEAT PUMP WITH IMPROVED DEHUMIDIFICATION TRPISOVSKY, JOSEPH F —

Pending Office Actions

App #TitleExaminerArt UnitStatutesStatusDue inAIFiled
18989667 HYBRID HEAT PUMP WITH IMPROVED DEHUMIDIFICATION TRPISOVSKY, JOSEPH F — §103§112 Non-Final OA — Pending Dec 20, 2024

Managing Ciimate Master Inc.'s Patent Portfolio?

IP Author helps IP teams respond to office actions faster with AI-generated responses, examiner analytics, and prosecution intelligence.

Start Free Trial

Sign in with your work email

Enter your email to receive a magic link. No password needed.

Personal email addresses (Gmail, Yahoo, etc.) are not accepted.

Free tier: 3 strategy analyses per month