Technology areas: Networking & Security • Medical Devices & Mechanical Engineering
2 pending office actions • 2 art units • 2 examiners • 0 of 2 (0%) have an AI response strategy ready
Cimarron Energy Inc. has 2 pending office actions in Networking & Security. The matters are assigned to 2 distinct examiners and 2 distinct art units. NOH, JAE NAM is the busiest examiner, with 1 pending matter, so the docket is distributed across both reported examination dimensions.
Counsel should manage the matters separately while maintaining a consistent description of the networking or security architecture. Because no examiner or art unit carries more than one reported pending matter, the strongest coordination opportunity is thematic rather than assignment-based. Response preparation should therefore combine a common technical framework with application-specific claim and prior-art analysis.
Difficulty is derived from the rejection statutes on the most recent pending office action. §101-driven and multi-statute cases are graded Hard; §112-only and obviousness-type double-patenting cases are graded Easy; everything else is Medium. "Unknown" means we have not yet parsed a statute for that office action.
| Bucket | Cases |
|---|---|
| §101 + other | 1 (50%) |
| §103 only | 1 (50%) |
How the docket's pending cases split across USPTO tech-center bands.
Manual office-action response work runs about 10 hours per case. The time-saved bands below show what IP Author's prosecution pipeline typically delivers — a conservative 20% on the low end, 35% in the middle, 50% on the high end.
| Examiner | Apps on this docket | Allow rate | Interview lift |
|---|---|---|---|
| NOH, JAE NAM | 1 | 86.4% | -9.4% |
| SHIRSAT, VIVEK K | 1 | 74.3% | +27.9% |
Multi-statute / §101-driven matters, or cases in front of an examiner with an allow rate under 30%. The top 1 ordered by deadline are shown.
| App # | Title | Examiner | Due in |
|---|---|---|---|
| 18800496 | Method of Measuring a Methane Destruction and Removal Efficiency of an Elevated Flare | NOH, JAE NAM | — |
Cases in front of an examiner whose interview lift is 10 percentage points or more — i.e. interviewed cases historically resolve more favorably than non-interviewed ones. The top 1 ordered by deadline are shown.
| App # | Title | Examiner | Due in |
|---|---|---|---|
| 18235093 | Hybrid Flare Apparatus | SHIRSAT, VIVEK K | — |
| Art Unit | Apps |
|---|---|
| 2481 | 1 |
| 3762 | 1 |
| App # | Title | Examiner | Art Unit | Statutes | Status | Due in | AI | Filed |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 18800496 | Method of Measuring a Methane Destruction and Removal Efficiency of an Elevated Flare | NOH, JAE NAM | 2481 | §101§102 | Non-Final OA | — | Pending | Aug 12, 2024 |
| 18235093 | Hybrid Flare Apparatus | SHIRSAT, VIVEK K | 3762 | §103 | Final Rejection | — | Pending | Aug 17, 2023 |
IP Author helps IP teams respond to office actions faster with AI-generated responses, examiner analytics, and prosecution intelligence.
Start Free TrialCimarron Energy Inc. has 2 pending office actions as of October 2026, spread across 2 art units and 2 examiners.
Jae Nam Noh has the most, with 1 of Cimarron Energy Inc.'s pending office actions.
Mostly Networking & Security (USPTO Tech Center 2400), based on where its pending office actions are examined.
