Technology area: Chemistry & Materials
1 pending office actions • 1 art units • 1 examiners • 0 of 1 (0%) have an AI response strategy ready
Cinis Fertilizer AB is currently managing 1 pending office action in the Chemistry & Materials technology area. This prosecution activity involves 1 distinct examiner and 1 distinct art unit. The fact that there is 1 pending office action total means that the company's current patent office interaction is entirely focused on this 1 examiner. Practitioners can concentrate their efforts on the specific procedural requirements of this 1 art unit without the need to reconcile conflicting feedback from other departments.
LANGEL, WAYNE A is the busiest examiner for the portfolio, with 1 busiest examiner pending action. This individual manages the entirety of the company's active docket in the Chemistry & Materials sector. Because the portfolio is limited to 1 distinct examiner, the company's immediate prosecution success depends on the resolution of this 1 matter. This high level of concentration suggests a targeted intellectual property strategy or a portfolio in its early stages of development.
Difficulty is derived from the rejection statutes on the most recent pending office action. §101-driven and multi-statute cases are graded Hard; §112-only and obviousness-type double-patenting cases are graded Easy; everything else is Medium. "Unknown" means we have not yet parsed a statute for that office action.
| Bucket | Cases |
|---|---|
| Double-patenting + other | 1 (100%) |
How the docket's pending cases split across USPTO tech-center bands.
Manual office-action response work runs about 10 hours per case. The time-saved bands below show what IP Author's prosecution pipeline typically delivers — a conservative 20% on the low end, 35% in the middle, 50% on the high end.
| Examiner | Apps on this docket | Allow rate | Interview lift |
|---|---|---|---|
| LANGEL, WAYNE A | 1 | 78.4% | +23.2% |
Cases in front of an examiner whose interview lift is 10 percentage points or more — i.e. interviewed cases historically resolve more favorably than non-interviewed ones. The top 1 ordered by deadline are shown.
| App # | Title | Examiner | Due in |
|---|---|---|---|
| 18562809 | PROCESS FOR TREATMENT OF A SODIUM SULFATE CONTAINING RESIDUE PROCESS STREAM OF A BATTERY MANUFACTURING FACILITY, A BATTERY RECYCLING FACILITY, OR A STEEL PRODUCTION PLANT | LANGEL, WAYNE A | — |
| Art Unit | Apps |
|---|---|
| 1736 | 1 |
| App # | Title | Examiner | Art Unit | Statutes | Status | Due in | AI | Filed |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 18562809 | PROCESS FOR TREATMENT OF A SODIUM SULFATE CONTAINING RESIDUE PROCESS STREAM OF A BATTERY MANUFACTURING FACILITY, A BATTERY RECYCLING FACILITY, OR A STEEL PRODUCTION PLANT | LANGEL, WAYNE A | 1736 | §102§103§112DP | Non-Final OA | — | Pending | Nov 20, 2023 |
IP Author helps IP teams respond to office actions faster with AI-generated responses, examiner analytics, and prosecution intelligence.
Start Free Trial