Prosecution Insights
Last updated: October 25, 2026

Cionic Inc.

Technology areas: Communications • Medical Devices & Mechanical Engineering

4 pending office actions • 3 art units • 4 examiners • 0 of 4 (0%) have an AI response strategy ready • 2 patents granted in the last 365 days

Analysis

Cionic Inc. has 4 pending office actions in the Medical Devices & Mechanical Engineering technology area. These 4 pending office actions are handled by 4 distinct examiners, meaning that every pending matter is being reviewed by a different individual. The prosecution involves 3 distinct art units, which reflects the technical variety of the company's medical and mechanical innovations. MA, CALVIN is the busiest examiner, currently managing 1 pending action. This distribution indicates that the portfolio is not concentrated under any single examiner, as 4 distinct examiners are involved in the process.

The presence of 3 distinct art units suggests that the company's patent applications are being reviewed by several different specialized technical groups within the medical device sector. With 4 distinct examiners, the company faces a high degree of variability in examiner behavior and interpretation. MA, CALVIN, who is the busiest examiner with 1 pending action, handles only 1 of the 4 pending office actions. This decentralized prosecution landscape requires a coordinated legal strategy to manage the 4 distinct examiners and 3 distinct art units effectively. The diversity of the 3 art units involved highlights the technical scope of Cionic Inc.'s current patenting efforts in the Medical Devices & Mechanical Engineering field.

Written from this page's own data; every figure is computed from USPTO records and verified before publication.

Portfolio Summary

4
Total Pending OAs
3
Non-Final OAs
1
Final Rejections
0
Advisory / Quayle

Case Difficulty Mix

Difficulty is derived from the rejection statutes on the most recent pending office action. §101-driven and multi-statute cases are graded Hard; §112-only and obviousness-type double-patenting cases are graded Easy; everything else is Medium. "Unknown" means we have not yet parsed a statute for that office action.

1
Hard (25%)
2
Medium (50%)
1
Easy (25%)
0
Unknown (0%)

Rejection Statute Mix

BucketCases
§103 only1 (25%)
Double-patenting only1 (25%)
Double-patenting + other1 (25%)
Multi-statute (no §101)1 (25%)

Industry Mix

How the docket's pending cases split across USPTO tech-center bands.

0
Life Sciences
0% of docket
0
Information Tech
0% of docket
1
Communications
25% of docket
0
Semiconductors
0% of docket
3
Mechanical / Eng
75% of docket
0
Business / Other
0% of docket

Time-on-OA Estimate

Manual office-action response work runs about 10 hours per case. The time-saved bands below show what IP Author's prosecution pipeline typically delivers — a conservative 20% on the low end, 35% in the middle, 50% on the high end.

40 h
Manual time on pending OAs
8 h
Time saved (low, 20%)
14 h
Time saved (mid, 35%)
0.3 wks
FTE-weeks freed (mid)

Top Examiners on this docket

ExaminerApps on this docketAllow rateInterview lift
MA, CALVIN 1 76.1% +13.0%
JOHNSON, NICOLE F 1 87.4% +7.3%
GEDEON, BRIAN T 1 87.0% +7.2%
DANIEL, ANTARIUS S 1 52.0% +14.4%

Quick Wins (2)

Cases in front of an examiner with an allow rate of 80%+ where the difficulty is Easy or Medium. The top 2 ordered by deadline are shown.

App #TitleExaminerDue in
18943116 ADAPTIVE STIMULATION ARRAY FOR MOTOR CONTROL JOHNSON, NICOLE F —
18419180 ADAPTIVE STIMULATION ARRAY CALIBRATION GEDEON, BRIAN T —

Hard Cases (1)

Multi-statute / §101-driven matters, or cases in front of an examiner with an allow rate under 30%. The top 1 ordered by deadline are shown.

App #TitleExaminerDue in
17411968 ELECTRONICALLY ASSISTED CHEMICAL STIMULUS FOR SYMPTOM INTERVENTION DANIEL, ANTARIUS S —

Interview Candidates (2)

Cases in front of an examiner whose interview lift is 10 percentage points or more — i.e. interviewed cases historically resolve more favorably than non-interviewed ones. The top 2 ordered by deadline are shown.

App #TitleExaminerDue in
19405882 IMPROVED MOBILITY BASED ON MACHINE-LEARNED MOVEMENT DETERMINATION MA, CALVIN —
17411968 ELECTRONICALLY ASSISTED CHEMICAL STIMULUS FOR SYMPTOM INTERVENTION DANIEL, ANTARIUS S —

Top Art Units

Art UnitApps
3796 2
2629 1
3783 1

Pending Office Actions

App #TitleExaminerArt UnitStatutesStatusDue inAIFiled
19405882 IMPROVED MOBILITY BASED ON MACHINE-LEARNED MOVEMENT DETERMINATION MA, CALVIN 2629 DP Non-Final OA — Pending Dec 02, 2025
18943116 ADAPTIVE STIMULATION ARRAY FOR MOTOR CONTROL JOHNSON, NICOLE F 3796 §103 Non-Final OA — Pending Nov 11, 2024
18419180 ADAPTIVE STIMULATION ARRAY CALIBRATION GEDEON, BRIAN T 3796 §102§103DP Non-Final OA — Pending Jan 22, 2024
17411968 ELECTRONICALLY ASSISTED CHEMICAL STIMULUS FOR SYMPTOM INTERVENTION DANIEL, ANTARIUS S 3783 §103§112 Final Rejection — Pending Aug 25, 2021

Managing Cionic Inc.'s Patent Portfolio?

IP Author helps IP teams respond to office actions faster with AI-generated responses, examiner analytics, and prosecution intelligence.

Start Free Trial

Frequently Asked Questions

How many pending USPTO office actions does Cionic Inc. have?

Cionic Inc. has 4 pending office actions as of October 2026, spread across 3 art units and 4 examiners.

Which USPTO examiner handles the most Cionic Inc. applications?

Calvin Ma has the most, with 1 of Cionic Inc.'s pending office actions.

What technology area are Cionic Inc.'s patent applications in?

Mostly Medical Devices & Mechanical Engineering (USPTO Tech Center 3700), based on where its pending office actions are examined.

Sign in with your work email

Enter your email to receive a magic link. No password needed.

Personal email addresses (Gmail, Yahoo, etc.) are not accepted.

Free tier: 3 strategy analyses per month